Home  Maps  About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O)

Posted by trainsarefun on Fri Dec 14 11:50:12 2007, in response to Re: MTA training (Re: Called A ''Terrorist'' By A T/O), posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Dec 14 11:25:08 2007.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Which is why all we can do at this time is say that "The events, as only presented by one side, show that the T/O was in the wrong, and that the customer wasn't. If any new evidence is brought, that could possibly change."

But who talks like THAT?!

"The events, as only presented by Eichmann, show that the Hebrews were in the wrong. If any new evidence is brought, especially by the allegedly deceased, that could possibly change."

A harsh rejoinder, but there's good reason why we don't make judgments in these situations. One can say that things appear a certain way (or not), or speak of probabilities, but it sounds very queer to talk in the way you suggest, because you're making a judgment based on the truth of a conditional whose truth is not known and whose truth is key to the judgment.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]