|
|
| Re: No, The outer boros get shafted (was: Re: Whining......) (417965) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: No, The outer boros get shafted (was: Re: Whining......) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Fri Apr 20 04:32:58 2007, in response to Re: No, The outer boros get shafted (was: Re: Whining......), posted by J trainloco on Fri Apr 20 00:23:17 2007. Your not debating with me..as You fail to see where Im driving at.All these projects were carried out by the TA years after they were planned..and ALL were to built to and For travel to Manhattan from the outer Boro's. Also..the ORIGINAL PLAN for 61st STREET had NOTHING to do with Queens... WE are NOT talking about 61st...We are talking about the 76TH ST tunnel to Steinway/Broadway[where there is a shell of the tunnel there this very day under Broadway]..which was placed in the plans as a way to counter the Queens Boro Presidents plan to with hold ANY AND EVERY bit of support to the City's BOND ISSUE for money to build the routes. Also..63rd st was to be built to support a new cross Queens route TO THE CBD of MANHATTAN..not QUEENS. I've PROVED my point over and beyond..but since you DON'T understand..I'll try to make it so you DO understand. All of these routes proposals that were built either was a direct connection or a branch of the UNBUILT SECOND AVENUE LINE.. Even IF the line ITSELF wasn't constructed due to whatever means the TA did..it STILL was for MANHATTAN SERVICE. Nothing was built to support outer boro transportation except the Brooklyn Queens Crosstown line...and even that was never finished. Also..the 6TH AVENUE subway could NOT have used PATH 's tunnels at ANY time due to the BOT STATING that the cost of refurbishing the HUDSON TUBE tunnels would have been TOO GREAT..and decided to shift the "express" tracks cost to the SECOND AVENUE PROJECT as a tie in. So I'm Not impressed by YOU. You can come better than that..give it a try by drawing up your OWN listing. |
|
|
|