Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary (334848)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary

Posted by RonInBayside on Mon Nov 6 16:43:56 2006, in response to Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary, posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Mon Nov 6 16:00:32 2006. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Thanks. Speaking of which, Miami Metrorail and the Norristown line are both above ground. So your observation about tunnel clearance, while valid, would not apply to them. So there must be another reason.

Responses

• Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - Olog-hai - Mon Nov 6 18:45:55 2006
  • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - RonInBayside - Mon Nov 6 18:57:46 2006
    • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - AEM-7AC #901 - Mon Nov 6 19:29:02 2006
      • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - RonInBayside - Mon Nov 6 20:07:20 2006
        • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - ntrainride - Thu Nov 9 15:51:09 2006
      • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - Wado MP73 - Tue Dec 12 21:23:35 2006
  • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - WillD - Tue Nov 7 15:46:51 2006
  • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - Wado MP73 - Tue Dec 12 21:05:31 2006
    • Re: LIRR: Third rail vs. catenary - tracksionmotor - Wed Dec 13 00:54:11 2006

Post a New Response