| Re: Hochul will veto anti-OPTO TWU rent-seeking bill (1645629) | |||
|
|
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
Re: Hochul will veto anti-OPTO TWU rent-seeking bill |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Dec 22 11:18:29 2025, in response to Re: Hochul will veto anti-OPTO TWU rent-seeking bill, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Dec 21 21:12:21 2025. It’s being penny wise and pound foolish. First, not having a second crewman isn’t negligent, so it wouldn’t lead to a payout for someone who claims he would have had a better outcome if there were a second crewman.Second, let’s assume that certain costs increase. If they did, it would still be cheaper than having a second crewman. Notice how all of the arguments in favor of a two person crew focus on eventualities and not day-to-day operations; the “but sometimes” fallacy. |