|
|
| Re: 3 to Flatbush (1641989) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: 3 to Flatbush |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sat Jun 21 07:04:10 2025, in response to 3 to Flatbush, posted by AlM on Fri Jun 20 19:26:41 2025. So far I've only heard of this, usually alongside the F/M (53rd/63rd) swap, in the context of railfans on YouTube suggesting it could happen. It wouldn't surprise me if the articles you are reading are just being taken off that -- do they cite sources? I get the impression the railfans are perpetuating it to put or keep the idea in MTA's mind, not so much that it originated from MTA.That all being said, I think deinterlining at Rogers is a good idea if it's just a matter of a couple of new switches (instead of a new flying junction). I'm neutral on the F/M swap. I think in both cases the subway map will be a bit more complicated in differentiating between weekdays and weekends, since I presume Utica will require two lines on the weekends and the 3 will have to go back to its normal route then. |
|
|
|