Re: R46 return to the C

Re: R46 return to the C (1458703)		Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses \| Post a New Response \| Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread \| Next in Thread ]

view flat
Re: R46 return to the C
Posted by randyo* on Mon Dec 18 00:07:33 2017, in response to Re: R46 return to the C, posted by Ian Lennon on Sun Dec 17 23:01:33 2017.* Except that the R-160s are not Bombardier. In order to insure mechanical reliability they should be from the same manufacturer as the R-160s as was the case with the R-188s.

Responses

Re: R46 return to the C - Ian Lennon - Mon Dec 18 12:37:55 2017
- Re: R46 return to the C - randyo - Mon Dec 18 13:05:29 2017
  - Re: R46 return to the C - Avid Reader - Tue Dec 19 12:24:29 2017
    - Re: R46 return to the C - checkthedoorlight - Tue Dec 19 13:57:39 2017
      - Re: R46 return to the C - Avid Reader - Tue Dec 19 16:03:00 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - r33/r36 mainline - Tue Dec 19 16:54:03 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - Far Rockaway A Train - Wed Dec 20 00:09:18 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - William A. Padron - Wed Dec 20 14:50:22 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - r33/r36 mainline - Wed Dec 20 15:10:56 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - Bill from Maspeth - Wed Dec 20 21:20:27 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - randyo - Thu Dec 21 19:04:45 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - Steve B-8AVEXP - Thu Dec 21 04:06:44 2017
        Re: R46 return to the C - r33/r36 mainline - Thu Dec 21 11:40:50 2017

Post a New Response

[ Return to the Message Index ]