|
|
| Re: W to Astoria/N and Q to 96th Street? Massive Changes Needed if Switching is to be reduced (1384719) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: W to Astoria/N and Q to 96th Street? Massive Changes Needed if Switching is to be reduced |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sun Feb 7 14:33:03 2016, in response to Re: W to Astoria/N and Q to 96th Street? Massive Changes Needed if Switching is to be reduced, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sun Feb 7 14:29:14 2016. If it makes sense operationally and fills passenger needs it really doesn't matter how "out there" the ideas are.Should Brighton riders ever want more Montague access (such that they want to give up their 6th Ave service in exchange for a Montague one), then a 4th Ave local D train to Bay Ridge should definitely in turn be considered to alleviate switching and still fill all the need. Right now it may not apply, but Brighton riders one day wanting more Montague access is a relatively realistic concept, something much more likely to happen in my lifetime then, say, the entirety of the SAS being built or many of the other fantasies we throw around here. |
|
|
|