|
|
| Re: The Problem with Misinformation (Re: To McGinty, Pagan, and Garces) (1378577) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: The Problem with Misinformation (Re: To McGinty, Pagan, and Garces) |
|
|
Posted by ren on Fri Dec 25 22:47:54 2015, in response to The Problem with Misinformation (Re: To McGinty, Pagan, and Garces), posted by Mysterious Friday 1986 on Fri Dec 25 22:25:57 2015. Omar - return my decals. When you do, then AND ONLY THEN can you criticize my intentions.Omar Pagan's post is incorrect. McGinty maneuvered me out of the volunteering group. He was jealous of the fact that I received certain materials. Then a disgruntled member accused me of certain things. That was the so-called "credible information", the same guy who didn't like being forced to return the materials he took without permission, the same guy who wanted to bring "ten bitches" to the shower stall in the trolley barn. I ALWAYS had permission to possess those materials. They were returned when asked for. McGinty was jealous of me. The materials were always in safe hands with me. But McGrumpy was always unhappy with my being there from day one. He was never as friendly to me as he was to Carlos Hernandez, for example. That was because Carlos reminded his wife of one her sons. Some people you just don't get along with, and McGinty was one of them. He actually forced a board vote on the president's decision to give me certain items. The board did not terminate me, he did. The R-16 is not really being restored. Every time I was there, the side of the R-16 was open and constantly being re-welded. This happened every single time I went there. If a simple thing like that cannot be done except over a whole year, what do you expect for the rest of the collection? TMNY wants to give up the Low-V for a redbird. Garces was going to send me and Omar and some others to the MTA yards to scout out a selection. The rest of Pagan's contentions do not require a great deal of discussion. He posits bold plans, but no specifics as to how these aims will be realized. Nor does he specify any funding sources to support these bold plans. Even if you peer past his grammatical barbarities, you cannot discern any tangible or realistic plans for the miraculous turnaround he forecasts beyond references to some vague associations. Like: "The museum has also made alliances with a number of groups and individuals to help and support one another, including this museum.(sic)" Wait...the museum is making an alliance with itself? WTF? |
|
|
|