|
|
| Re: Orange Is the New Black actress vs. Homophobic moron preacher on uptown (M) train (1325611) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Orange Is the New Black actress vs. Homophobic moron preacher on uptown (M) train |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Nov 27 06:00:33 2014, in response to Re: Orange Is the New Black actress vs. Homophobic moron preacher on uptown (M) train, posted by terRAPIN station on Thu Nov 13 13:12:45 2014. Then you're even dumber than I already thought. Wow.So you're a Christian and a Muslim now? Because you have no qualms in saying they follow easily corruptible books despite having the same "controls" you do. First of all, I have no idea what protections are in place for Christian and Muslim texts and no comparison should be made. Right. Errapin Statio doesn't know about it, therefore it doesn't exist. Second of all, I made no claim that it couldn't be corrupted. I quite clearly stated: "Controls were put in place to prevent that from happening. So your scenario ("all our existing copies are copied from the original source of the error") is unlikely." Controls were put in place on SubChat to prevent people from posting your real name, Errapin Statio, and yet that can be done easily. Since you have not named any controls put in place on the Torah at all, let alone explained how they can prevent inevitable copying errors, your claim is unsubstantiated. That sucks. But I'm sure other links can be found that are more clear. Good. Then you should be able to find a few. So are you claiming thousands of copyists over thousands of years were all infallible? No. Or that someone told to be very careful will never make a mistake? No. That safety measures against failure will be 100% effective when followed, and that they'll be followed 100% of the time? No. If a mistake happens during the copying, which is highly unlikely for a whole bunch of reasons), then it would would probably be found by someone else and either corrected or destroyed. Ah, so what you're saying is that the copyists are almost infallible and the error correction methods are infallible. |
|
|
|