|
|
| Re: Orange Is the New Black actress vs. Homophobic moron preacher on uptown (M) train (1325748) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Orange Is the New Black actress vs. Homophobic moron preacher on uptown (M) train |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Nov 27 22:34:25 2014, in response to Re: Orange Is the New Black actress vs. Homophobic moron preacher on uptown (M) train, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 27 20:37:00 2014. Again you're commenting on something that you have no knowledge of. That makes you an idiot.Are you claiming I have "no knowledge" of writing or copying, or of the limits on human ability and flaws inherent to human nature? We're not exactly talking about obscure or complex ideas here. Any book which is copied by hand thousands upon thousands of times by people with a very strong motivation to make deliberate alterations is bound to have accumulated a few errors. You are claiming your favourite book has a special magic exemption to these facts, but have not offered any evidence to substantiate this claim. I would never comment conclusively about a subject that I have no knowledge of. HA! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! You are too funny. :) Anyhow, like you guessed, there are infallible error correction controls in place. Which are? Do tell. Thus far, humans have never been "infallible" at anything. Whatever method allows humans to achieve perfection is bound to have greater value than merely copying books. No, I just don't want to bother, because you're an asshole. I don't waste my time with assholes. Or in other words, you don't actually have any reasons and you are, in fact, being irrational but you simply lack the maturity to admit it. Oh and speaking of which, if you read your last post and my last reply, you will notice that in my quotation of your words, a rather critical "w" was omitted, transforming "wrote" (ie, committed to paper) into "rote" (ie, memorised through repetition). This copying error slipped unnoticed past your infallible error correction methods, and as such I can safely conclude they do not exist. |
|
|
|