|
|
| Re: High Speed Rail vs Really Fast Regional Rail (1153278) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: High Speed Rail vs Really Fast Regional Rail |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Fri Apr 27 09:23:26 2012, in response to Re: High Speed Rail vs Really Fast Regional Rail, posted by Wado MP73 on Fri Apr 27 04:14:59 2012. Also, I agree 110% that Acela should've been sent via the inland route. More of the population lives along that way anyway. Why the shoreline route became the more valuable one is beyond me (perhaps b/c CSX owns the inland route?). With the shoreline route being supposedly maxed out b/c of the bridge issues, the inland route is the logical next step. Hell you could have inland route trains running to North Station, allowing for connection to the Downeaster. Imagine one station being just for regionals and the other being only for Acela. |
|
|
|