Re: Long Island City... (1147693)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: Long Island City...

Posted by Think twice on Sat Mar 31 13:56:32 2012, in response to Re: Long Island City..., posted by J trainloco on Fri Mar 30 22:27:43 2012. Agreed. The line is almost equidistant from some of the most congested lines in Brooklyn and Queens. It would definitely help relieve that. Plus, the businesses and real estate interests along it would be creaming over at the prospect of their neighborhood becoming the next Greenpoint, Bushwick, Astoria, or Sunnyside. However, to preserve the vital freight operations, perhaps double-deck grade separations or elevated viaducts would be necessary. View Lower Montauk Line: World Trade Center - Jamaica in a larger map The Ego Trip Express: egotripexpress.tumblr.com

Responses

• Re: Long Island City... - Olog-hai - Sat Mar 31 14:00:07 2012
• Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 14:29:06 2012
  • Re: Long Island City... - GP38/R42 Chris - Sat Mar 31 18:21:32 2012
    • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 19:55:14 2012
      • Re: Long Island City... - NIMBYkiller - Fri Apr 6 03:41:04 2012
• Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sat Mar 31 18:07:33 2012
  • Re: Long Island City... - GP38/R42 Chris - Sat Mar 31 18:22:45 2012
    • Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sat Mar 31 19:11:24 2012
      • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 19:56:20 2012
        • Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sat Mar 31 20:47:35 2012
          • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 21:02:25 2012
            • Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sat Mar 31 21:22:41 2012
              • Re: Long Island City... - tunnelrat - Sat Mar 31 21:25:11 2012
              • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 21:32:10 2012
    • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sat Mar 31 20:34:26 2012
      • Re: Long Island City... - tunnelrat - Sat Mar 31 20:36:18 2012
      • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 20:43:11 2012
        • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sat Mar 31 20:47:59 2012
          • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 21:04:58 2012
            • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sat Mar 31 21:16:53 2012
              • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Sat Mar 31 21:26:06 2012
                • Re: Long Island City... - Q4 - Mon Apr 2 15:05:33 2012
          • Re: Long Island City... - Wado MP73 - Sun Apr 1 10:38:09 2012
            • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sun Apr 1 19:11:49 2012
              • Re: Long Island City... - Andrew Saucci - Sun Apr 1 20:29:23 2012
      • Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sat Mar 31 21:03:17 2012
        • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sat Mar 31 21:30:16 2012
          • Re: Long Island City... - Wado MP73 - Sun Apr 1 10:33:59 2012
            • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sun Apr 1 19:14:57 2012
      • Re: Long Island City... - Andrew Saucci - Sun Apr 1 20:33:20 2012
        • Re: Long Island City... - Joe V - Mon Apr 2 17:52:16 2012
  • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sat Mar 31 20:52:11 2012
    • Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sat Mar 31 21:32:42 2012
• Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sat Mar 31 21:02:58 2012
  • Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sat Mar 31 21:28:30 2012
    • Re: Long Island City... - AEM-7AC #901 - Sun Apr 1 01:15:09 2012
      • Re: Long Island City... - J trainloco - Sun Apr 1 10:46:16 2012

Post a New Response