|
|
| Re: ISSUE AT FOREST HILLS (1055254) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: ISSUE AT FOREST HILLS |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Fri Apr 15 12:44:09 2011, in response to Re: ISSUE AT FOREST HILLS, posted by BMTLines on Fri Apr 15 10:20:53 2011. As for being wrong - facts may be wrong (ie. 56 vs 50) but 40 or 44 is still less than 50 so a CONCLUSION that 44 is less comfortable than 50 is still valid regardless. LOL. I never said otherwise. (Though that conclusion you posted needs a lot of qualifiers - it certainly isn't true universally.) Clearly, as with the few haters here, your hate stems from your misunderstanding of my posts. And then instead of trying to clarify, you just make unwarranted attacks. But since you love rehashing arguments ad-infinitum here is my rebuttal to the argument that started all this. You may not LIKE the conclusion I reach but that does not mean that I am "wrong" in reaching it. Of course in your world the only correct opinions are YOURS! Nope, I clearly and successfully pointed out what you were wrong about in the threads where we had the discussion. Has nothing to do with opinion. Your facts were wrong and I corrected you. You didn't like that so you made unwarranted attacks. Same story as with a few others here. You've joined quite a proud crew. I said it then and I'll say it again - it seems that you are not an honest person when it comes to having these discussions. What you wrote here just further shows that. |
|
|
|