|
|
| Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 (970850) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (970850) | |
Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 17:36:34 2012 Politico |
|
|
| (970856) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 17:43:39 2012, in response to Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 17:36:34 2012. Great news. So now you have nothing to worry about. |
|
|
| (970858) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 17:44:11 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 17:43:39 2012. Actually, I am not worried in the least. Thank you for your concern. |
|
|
| (970863) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 17:47:58 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 17:44:11 2012. I have no concerns either. |
|
|
| (970868) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 18:02:03 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 17:47:58 2012. I'm glad you are at peace with Obama winning the election. |
|
|
| (970877) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 18:31:23 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 18:02:03 2012. yay .......lol |
|
|
| (970888) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:04:32 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 18:31:23 2012. I'm surprised you like Obama so much.I mean he's HALF white and we all know how you feel about white folks! |
|
|
| (970889) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 19:09:35 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:04:32 2012. Will you please stop picking on salaamallah, that is below you. |
|
|
| (970896) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:18:06 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 19:09:35 2012. He started it!neah see!  |
|
|
| (970901) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 19:20:30 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:18:06 2012. no i did not LOL |
|
|
| (970905) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:34:49 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 19:20:30 2012. You called me a Nazi/KKK member and to this date I still have not received an apology. |
|
|
| (970906) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:35:39 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 19:20:30 2012. You asked me TWICE if I murdered my wife! |
|
|
| (970922) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Aug 8 20:05:09 2012, in response to Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 17:36:34 2012. Makes no sense to focus on the national polls.I'd watch Florida, Ohio, and Virginia closely. Even NPR agrees and I've posted their stuff here all week. Fairfax VA, Hillsborough FL, and one or two counties in Ohio will ultimately decided the next President. |
|
|
| (970947) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Aug 8 20:39:16 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Aug 8 20:05:09 2012. Nope. Probably Nashua, NH. |
|
|
| (970949) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:43:33 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:34:49 2012. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ |
|
|
| (970950) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:45:38 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:35:39 2012. wow |
|
|
| (970952) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Aug 8 20:46:46 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:45:38 2012. that's what I always say. |
|
|
| (970954) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:48:30 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Aug 8 20:46:46 2012. must be true |
|
|
| (970957) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Aug 8 20:50:46 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:48:30 2012. is is true. wow is very true. |
|
|
| (970958) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:51:40 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Aug 8 20:50:46 2012. i believe it lol |
|
|
| (970962) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:54:17 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:51:40 2012. Nothing from Dan Lawrence, zzzzzzzz's for him! |
|
|
| (970963) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:54:45 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:43:33 2012. Wake up and get a job! |
|
|
| (970964) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:55:06 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:54:17 2012. LOL |
|
|
| (970966) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:55:59 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:54:45 2012. none of your business where and when i work |
|
|
| (970967) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:58:21 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:55:06 2012. And he was defending you and you laugh at him! |
|
|
| (970968) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:58:44 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:58:21 2012. ?? |
|
|
| (970969) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:58:46 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:55:59 2012. You can't!You're always sleep! |
|
|
| (970971) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:59:21 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 20:58:46 2012. LOL |
|
|
| (970972) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 21:01:59 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 20:58:44 2012. My God, you are really slow!Is that why you were picked on in elementary school? Bad memories! |
|
|
| (970973) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 21:02:31 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 21:01:59 2012. ??????? |
|
|
| (970986) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 21:12:35 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 21:02:31 2012. Oh, this post! LOL! |
|
|
| (970987) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by Italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 21:13:55 2012, in response to Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by italianstallion on Wed Aug 8 17:36:34 2012. Where's poll-dancer Chris? |
|
|
| (971002) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Aug 8 21:28:29 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by mr mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 21:12:35 2012. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ |
|
|
| (971242) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Thu Aug 9 05:44:54 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Aug 8 20:05:09 2012. I heard a Politico reporter being interviewed on WTOP say yesterday that VA's electoral votes will ultimately go to the winner. It is definitely a state to watch (the entire state, not just Fairfax, and Fairfax is probably less important than Prince William, Loudoun, and the Hampton Roads/Norfolk area). |
|
|
| (971244) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 05:52:26 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Thu Aug 9 05:44:54 2012. Here's the latest:
|
|
|
| (971245) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 05:53:05 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Thu Aug 9 05:44:54 2012. The demographics have changed so much in Fairfax in recent years, that it may be the county that makes the difference.I think that's why Fairfax is mentioned. Just like Lake County Indiana played a role in Obama winning that state. I won't be voting for any Democrats because I don't like the e-harmony lawsuit. |
|
|
| (971246) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 05:57:33 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 05:52:26 2012. Yes, Obama won NC in 2008, and I can accept it as a tie. Any poll saying otherwise is probably wrong.What is wrong with Rasmussen? |
|
|
| (971248) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:03:19 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 05:57:33 2012. Rasmussen has proven not credible. They do the "include Rasmussen" on the main page but anyone that can math uses this one. Their polling methods have been demonstrated to be dishonest over the past five election cycles, and they juice the results until the final week when suddenly everything moves to reality.That said, anyone who takes ANY poll this far out deserves their butthurt. :) But them's the numbers as of last night. |
|
|
| (971249) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:06:58 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:03:19 2012. in other words, Rasmussen appears on Fox News, so his polls are useless.based on the numbers from the last election and midterms, Rasmussen looks legit to me. He has Obama ahead in VA by 2. |
|
|
| (971250) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:08:28 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:06:58 2012. Go to the site, read the explanation. They lie throughout the campaigns and then at the very last minute change everything so as to claim that they were correct at the end. And yeah, figures they're hooked up with Rupert now doesn't it? :) |
|
|
| (971251) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:10:06 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:08:28 2012. Rasmussen says 61% favor Chick-fil-A.LOL |
|
|
| (971252) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 9 06:14:52 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 05:57:33 2012. Reasons for no Rasmussenyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (971253) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:17:10 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:10:06 2012. And I'll bet they got THOSE numbers completely wrong too. I actually thing the number would be higher than that if a pollster called most folks. The guy who runs electoral-vote is an American math geek who is working over in the Netherlands now. He's actually a republican-leaner but doesn't care about partisan stuff. But he sure DOES care about math and accuracy in statistics ... that's why he does the site.For any real political fans, check out his algorithms and detailed number-crunching. But Rasmussen has ZERO credibility with anyone in that business. Except for Rupert and Ailes of course ... they like fudged numbers and facts. :( |
|
|
| (971254) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:20:28 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 9 06:14:52 2012. Thanks ... I withheld that in hopes that folks would bookmark the site and use it themselves. :) |
|
|
| (971255) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:21:28 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:17:10 2012. Rasmussen site says he's getting a syndicated show this fall.The poll you're using seems a bit generous to the Democrats. I don't think anyone thinks NC is anything but a tie right now. It's why the DNC is in that state this year. |
|
|
| (971256) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:23:40 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:20:28 2012. Interesting, between 5:50 am and now, NC went from Obama to Romney. |
|
|
| (971257) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:25:58 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:21:28 2012. Good for Rasmussen. Rupert owes him that much now that everybody else is ignoring him. :)And as to the site, you really should go there and read through it. He doesn't DO any polls. He only keeps all of the rest of them honest with his own database tracking ALL the various results. And like I said, anybody that takes any polls THIS early as gospel deserves their butthurt. But if you want to track ALL of the polls, that's where you can do it without being lead by the nose by ONE pollster. |
|
|
| (971258) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:27:27 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:23:40 2012. Heh. Nope ... that's Rasmussen ... click on "Without Rasmussen." |
|
|
| (971259) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:27:35 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 9 06:14:52 2012. LOL!!!I want to hear Selkirk's rant. Fox News. Rupert. All that stuff. |
|
|
| (971260) | |
Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42 |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Aug 9 06:28:15 2012, in response to Re: Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 49, Romney 42, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Aug 9 06:27:35 2012. Nope ... I'm done ... enjoy your fact-free results. :) |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|