Home  Maps  About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2]

< Previous Page  

Page 2 of 2

 

(919581)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 00:21:21 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 00:07:38 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I never suggested that it does. It's just interesting to note how careful one must be when dealing with Islamic terrorism. Obama is not the only guilty party. Bloomberg overreacted to the TSQ bomber too.

Post a New Response

(919586)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 00:32:32 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Train Dude on Wed Mar 14 00:18:38 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No. How is anyone being sacrificed?

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(919588)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 00:35:20 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 00:21:21 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Huh? What are you talking about?

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(919592)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 00:39:44 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 00:35:20 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You know what I'm talking about. Obama warned everyone not to rush to judgement after the Hasan shooting but didn't in the most recent shooting. That's an example of political correctness applied when dealing with Islamic terrorism. That's why Olog-hai pointed it out, and he's right. It's obvious to see.

Post a New Response

(919593)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 00:42:53 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 00:39:44 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!!

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(919595)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 00:44:57 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 00:42:53 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Had it not been a Muslim army general, I don't think Obama would have warned about rushing to judgement. That was why he chose the words he did. In the most recent case, the victims are Muslims, and his choice of words can be different. Harsher. THIW.

Post a New Response

(919596)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Mar 14 00:48:43 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 00:44:57 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Uh-huh; THIG.

Post a New Response

(919598)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Mar 14 01:03:35 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 00:32:32 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Quick trial and execution. All ready being said that he's eligable for the death penalty. Have we heard that about the Ft. Hood killer?

Post a New Response

(919600)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Mar 14 01:07:09 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 00:44:57 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
"Had it not been a Muslim army general, I don't think Obama would have warned about rushing to judgement. "

Can't blame obama for showing some favoritism toward the old home team.

Post a New Response

(919625)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Mar 14 04:48:24 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by orange blossom special on Tue Mar 13 18:35:55 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
When I go to walmart

LOL


even flour is skyrocketing, gas is doubling, electricity is skyrocketing, foreclosures are skyrocketing,

In your double-digit unemployment Right-to-Work-for-Less Shit State perhaps.

Here in the First World, things are fine.

We don't riot over the price of flour like in the Third World favelas where you live.

Post a New Response

(919639)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 06:47:22 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Train Dude on Wed Mar 14 01:03:35 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes, a TRIAL. So...no sacrifice.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(919641)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by SMAZ on Wed Mar 14 06:51:27 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Train Dude on Wed Mar 14 01:03:35 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It's the defendant's right to ask for a quick trial, not the government's, stupid.

Post a New Response

(919644)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by ClearAspect on Wed Mar 14 07:22:58 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 13 23:52:12 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Oh shut up Luch you're an annoying Troll. Who deep down is a racist because everything you see is with Racist undertones.

Post a New Response

(919645)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Fred G on Wed Mar 14 07:28:20 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Mar 13 23:52:12 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
As you don't remember, the debate was whether he was a terrorist or just a sick individual. Some of us pointed out that the Army was investigating the incident and individual and we were willing to let them do their work without us jumping to conclusions. Others already had him convicted because of his last name.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(919680)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by bingbong on Wed Mar 14 12:59:58 2012, in response to Obama promises "full force of law" on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 13 18:02:15 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
All criminal trials involve the "full force of the law". In both of these cases the defendant has the right to being fit for that trial. In both cases, like it or not, there are issues regarding fitness. Time will tell how they play out.

Post a New Response

(919951)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 23:51:51 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by ClearAspect on Wed Mar 14 07:22:58 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You came here today to leave one message for one person you don't like, and that's not being a troll? And that person wasn't even engaging you in the thread. There's nothing racial about my post. I was simply agreeing with Olog's observation.

Seems like someone owns a piece of real estate in your head.

Post a New Response

(919971)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 15 01:12:26 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Mar 14 23:51:51 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's kinda sad. Not a word out of him about what happened in Egypt's parliament either.

Post a New Response

(919976)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Mar 15 02:13:33 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 15 01:12:26 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Recently he said it's a step in the right direction. A phase they're going through like we did when we had slavery then segregation to equal rights for all.

It is sad that he sought me out when I didn't even say anything so inciting.

Post a New Response

(919978)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 15 02:38:10 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Mar 15 02:13:33 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Recently he said it's a step in the right direction. A phase they're going through like we did when we had slavery then segregation to equal rights for all

I remember. But the USA was not the Ottoman Empire before it became the USA. It started with the same Constitution it has today; Egypt is regressing and adopting Shari'a Law. Never mind the fact that Egypt has existed for millennia while the USA is struggling to reach 2 centuries.

Post a New Response

(919983)

view threaded

Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?

Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Mar 15 02:47:43 2012, in response to Re: Obama promises ''full force of law'' on Army sergeant (Afghanistan), but Fort Hood . . . ?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 15 02:38:10 2012.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well, he actually may have posted twice today, but it's still obvious that someone has a piece in his head.

As Egypt worsens, leftist most involved in the thread at first become quiet.

Post a New Response

[1 2]

< Previous Page  

Page 2 of 2

 

[ Return to the Message Index ]