|
|
| Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State (913091) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 4 |
||
|
| (913294) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 19:30:31 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 19:21:36 2012. That's OK ... I'm still having fun ... hope you are too. :) |
|
|
| (913295) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 26 19:30:50 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 26 19:11:08 2012. Why would he throw up in a vomitorium? |
|
|
| (913296) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 19:32:32 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Feb 26 19:30:50 2012. Because it rhymes. :) |
|
|
| (913300) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 19:49:03 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by AlM on Sun Feb 26 19:13:43 2012. Holding an opinion is not offensive in and of itself. Santorum is a religious guy. We get it. Next subject please. |
|
|
| (913302) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 19:50:07 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 19:49:03 2012. Holding an opinion is not offensive in and of itselfIt is to a leftist. They really do want to control thought; that's why they come out with hate-crime laws, which legislate thought rather than action. |
|
|
| (913323) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 20:48:28 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 19:30:31 2012. And that's what it is. Propaganda. YOU know it just as much as I do.It's all the Democrats and the left have... |
|
|
| (913324) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 20:49:41 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 20:48:28 2012. Of course!And ya gotta admit, that democrat Santorum playing that card was delicious. Oh wait ... :) |
|
|
| (913325) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 26 20:50:18 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 19:49:03 2012. Given his stated intention to impose his religion through law upon everyone, regardless of their adherence to his, do you think the man belongs in high office?I think not. No liberal will fault him his way of life, but there's no way it should be imposed on anyone else. |
|
|
| (913327) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 20:51:57 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 26 20:50:18 2012. Oh please. |
|
|
| (913329) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 26 21:09:16 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 20:51:57 2012. So why are you supporting him? |
|
|
| (913340) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 21:50:03 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 19:23:25 2012. Unlike the Leftists who are joined at the hip with any Democratic politician,Leftists are SUPPOSED to be joined at the hip to the Democrats just like right-wingers are supposed to be joined at the hip of the Republicans, yet YOU, who call yourself a moderate or independent (LOL!) would vote for something like The Santorum over a Barack Obama. That's all we need to know about your philosophy. |
|
|
| (913341) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 21:50:43 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 26 21:09:16 2012. I rather have romney....but santorum is still the lesser of two evils in the november election against obama. |
|
|
| (913342) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 21:52:18 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sun Feb 26 19:16:39 2012. But Curly Howard ain't gonna be on the ballot against my President.It'll be Romney or Santorum. If Santorum is sickened by JFK assuring Southern Baptists that he would not impose his version of Christianity on them imagine what he thinks he could do with your religion. |
|
|
| (913343) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 21:56:21 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 21:50:43 2012. That you think that the American Taliban is the lesser of two evils over Obama demonstrates that you are unfit to be a voter. |
|
|
| (913346) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 22:02:58 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 21:56:21 2012. Lmao!!!!! |
|
|
| (913347) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 22:03:48 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 21:52:18 2012. More leftist propaganda. |
|
|
| (913350) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 22:09:00 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 21:50:03 2012. I also voted for Clinton....cuomo...tons of democrats in local positions. Sounds pretty Independent to me....and sounds like my post was correct. |
|
|
| (913352) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 22:18:58 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 22:03:48 2012. It's time for a change. Change! No more of the same. |
|
|
| (913353) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 22:22:37 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 22:18:58 2012. It's time for a change. Change! No more of the same.Indeed. Here is the "change" that you will be voting for.  |
|
|
| (913354) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 22:23:36 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 22:22:37 2012. Yeah, but "sharia" sounds so much better when it's spelled "faith-based" ... |
|
|
| (913356) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 22:27:02 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 22:03:48 2012. Way too much of that stuff. |
|
|
| (913361) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 22:39:53 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 22:22:37 2012. LOL!!!! Continue the propaganda, it's getting funnier by the day! |
|
|
| (913362) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 22:46:15 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 22:23:36 2012. I prefer "canonical" myself. |
|
|
| (913363) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Feb 26 22:47:11 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 22:46:15 2012. Yeah, but conservatards won't get the connection. :) |
|
|
| (913364) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 22:58:36 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 22:22:37 2012. Here is the "change" that you will be voting for. . . if you vote for the incumbent. (Hint: Go for funny next time, not dumb.) |
|
|
| (913373) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sun Feb 26 23:45:24 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 22:18:58 2012. uhhumm..what sort of change are you asking for? |
|
|
| (913374) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sun Feb 26 23:49:42 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 13:35:12 2012. my question to you is simple enough that yes or no should suffice..did rick say it? |
|
|
| (913375) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sun Feb 26 23:51:31 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by bingbong on Sun Feb 26 14:17:11 2012. which im sure they will refute somehow saying you did really see what your eyes showed you. |
|
|
| (913379) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sun Feb 26 23:55:40 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 20:48:28 2012. yeahh..and the republicans say things like "I hate JFK,HE makes me throw up"..a man dead 49 years..guess picking on someone who can defend himself is a perfect victim for a losing dickhead. |
|
|
| (913393) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:16:34 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Edwards! on Sun Feb 26 23:45:24 2012. "Chump" ... he's voting for it. :) |
|
|
| (913395) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:17:49 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Edwards! on Sun Feb 26 23:55:40 2012. Should we even bother with the republican refrain of ... "He ain't President anymore so it doesn't matter?" :) |
|
|
| (913396) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:26:33 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:17:49 2012. I figure why stop there?why not pick on PT BARNUM too? |
|
|
| (913397) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:28:48 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:16:34 2012. yeah..thats all we need..more "trickle down" change from our elite group.. |
|
|
| (913398) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:29:08 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:26:33 2012. Man ... you can't be picking on the party's godhead and expect not to get a beatdown. :) |
|
|
| (913399) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:29:49 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:28:48 2012. And to think ... even upstate, they've made progress in eliminating public urination. :) |
|
|
| (913400) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:34:18 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:29:08 2012. huh?PUT THEM IN SKIRTS..AND THEIR GODHEAD TOO. That graven image should rattle enough trickled owners that they think its raining urine on their heads.. |
|
|
| (913401) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:36:00 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 00:29:49 2012. did they give you enough time to see it?lol! Even the dog kennel? |
|
|
| (913404) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 01:05:26 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:34:18 2012. Too Scottish ... you'll give Olog a tumor. :) |
|
|
| (913405) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 27 01:05:58 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 00:36:00 2012. Heh. Worked the capitol for too many years. I'll wait for the DVD. :) |
|
|
| (913406) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 27 02:03:06 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Feb 26 19:50:07 2012. So you don't believe that attempted murder is a crime? |
|
|
| (913408) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 27 02:04:45 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 21:50:43 2012. You are an ignorant fool unworthy of respect if you believe that Santorum is a better candidate than anyone in this election. |
|
|
| (913409) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 27 02:08:32 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 22:09:00 2012. Voting for Santorum overrides that hundredfold. You'd have to vote for the socialist workers party in the next election to balance that out. |
|
|
| (913410) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 27 02:09:57 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 22:18:58 2012. Change for the worse is what you want, apparently. |
|
|
| (913411) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 27 02:10:43 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 22:39:53 2012. It's not propaganda, it's the man's own words. |
|
|
| (913413) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 02:14:41 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Feb 26 21:50:43 2012. uhhh..was that intentional..or did you wanna piss people off?or Both? |
|
|
| (913414) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Feb 27 02:15:44 2012, in response to The Santorum "Sickened" by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by SMAZ on Sun Feb 26 12:49:55 2012. Hey look - the democrats have a new "enemy of the week" to begin to attack. I guess Santorum is now leading in the polls. |
|
|
| (913416) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 02:17:41 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 19:49:03 2012. sure is..but I dont want any freakin politician telling me what to do..dem or repuke!especially one like ricky boy! |
|
|
| (913420) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 02:20:06 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Train Dude on Mon Feb 27 02:15:44 2012. ehh..its a living.. |
|
|
| (913421) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 02:20:29 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Feb 27 02:10:43 2012. WORD,SON! |
|
|
| (913424) | |
Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Mon Feb 27 02:23:59 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Blah'' blah Blah's Blah blah Blah blah Blah, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 26 19:23:25 2012. LOL!..ITS OKAY...people..chris is okay..plenty of air..room..too much JD in the coffee...uhh. |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 4 |
||