Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State

Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State (913325)		Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat
	[ Read Responses \| Post a New Response \| Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread \| Next in Thread ]

view flat
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State
Posted by bingbong* on Sun Feb 26 20:50:18 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Feb 26 19:49:03 2012.* edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Given his stated intention to impose his religion through law upon everyone, regardless of their adherence to his, do you think the man belongs in high office? I think not. No liberal will fault him his way of life, but there's no way it should be imposed on anyone else.

Responses

Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Sun Feb 26 20:51:57 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - bingbong - Sun Feb 26 21:09:16 2012
  - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - gp38/r42 chris - Sun Feb 26 21:50:43 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Sun Feb 26 21:56:21 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - gp38/r42 chris - Sun Feb 26 22:02:58 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 02:04:45 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Edwards! - Mon Feb 27 02:14:41 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Fred G - Mon Feb 27 07:17:08 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Dan Lawrence - Mon Feb 27 09:42:59 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 10:01:11 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - AlM - Mon Feb 27 10:01:38 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 10:07:45 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 14:46:24 2012
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Chris R16/R2730 - Mon Feb 27 11:52:29 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - AlM - Mon Feb 27 12:14:57 2012
  - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 12:29:51 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Chris R16/R2730 - Mon Feb 27 16:05:18 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 16:54:07 2012
  - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Chris R16/R2730 - Mon Feb 27 16:04:40 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 16:13:03 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 16:21:03 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 16:29:17 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 17:58:06 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:01:50 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:04:45 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 18:05:33 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:14:53 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 18:34:22 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:36:47 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:13:21 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:12:40 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:15:55 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:16:43 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:22:23 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:24:38 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:34:24 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Olog-hai - Mon Feb 27 18:36:51 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:40:22 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:39:08 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:48:00 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:52:53 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 19:32:43 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 19:42:19 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:29:48 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:34:22 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:45:10 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:50:32 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 19:36:33 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 19:49:14 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - AlM - Mon Feb 27 16:21:13 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 16:33:23 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - streetcarman1 - Mon Feb 27 16:52:39 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:16:34 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:20:55 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Blahened'' by Blah's Blahsurances blah Blah blah Blah - Olog-hai - Mon Feb 27 18:22:51 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 17:26:09 2012

Post a New Response

Your Handle:
Your Password:
E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:
Before posting.. think twice!

[ Return to the Message Index ]