Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State

Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State (913535)		Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat
	[ Read Responses \| Post a New Response \| Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread \| Next in Thread ]

view flat
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State
Posted by AlM* on Mon Feb 27 12:14:57 2012, in response to Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Feb 27 11:52:29 2012.* edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d People don't want to hear this shit, they want to talk about jobs and the economy and the woeful record the current president has in relation to both issues. Then why does Santorum keep bringing it up (and before him, Gingrich and Bachman)?

Responses

Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 12:29:51 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Chris R16/R2730 - Mon Feb 27 16:05:18 2012
  - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 16:54:07 2012
Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Chris R16/R2730 - Mon Feb 27 16:04:40 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 16:13:03 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 16:21:03 2012
  - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 16:29:17 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 17:58:06 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:01:50 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:04:45 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Spider-Pig - Mon Feb 27 18:05:33 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:14:53 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 18:34:22 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:36:47 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:13:21 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:12:40 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:15:55 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:16:43 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - LuchAAA - Mon Feb 27 18:22:23 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:24:38 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:34:24 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - Olog-hai - Mon Feb 27 18:36:51 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:40:22 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:39:08 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:48:00 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:52:53 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 19:32:43 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 19:42:19 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:29:48 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:34:22 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:45:10 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:50:32 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 19:36:33 2012
        Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 19:49:14 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - AlM - Mon Feb 27 16:21:13 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SMAZ - Mon Feb 27 16:33:23 2012
  - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - streetcarman1 - Mon Feb 27 16:52:39 2012
    - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - GP38/R42 Chris - Mon Feb 27 18:16:34 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 18:20:55 2012
      - Re: The Santorum ''Blahened'' by Blah's Blahsurances blah Blah blah Blah - Olog-hai - Mon Feb 27 18:22:51 2012
- Re: The Santorum ''Sickened'' by JFK's Assurances on Church and State - SelkirkTMO - Mon Feb 27 17:26:09 2012

Post a New Response

Your Handle:
Your Password:
E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:
Before posting.. think twice!

[ Return to the Message Index ]