|
|
| Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's (901688) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
|
| (902015) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 22:55:23 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 22 22:46:19 2012. You were way cooler when you weren’t being stupid. How many NSF/NIH proposals have you seen/helped edit? |
|
|
| (902016) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 22:56:00 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 22:53:03 2012. Criminalized means that it’s illegal if it’s not illegal it’s not criminalized. You can’t change the definition of words after you have been proven wrong. |
|
|
| (902019) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 22:58:26 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 21:59:34 2012. And the therapy he talked about used adult stem cells; adult stem cell research never even faced funding restrictions |
|
|
| (902020) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 22 22:58:35 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 22:51:37 2012. I explained it right here: You are completely out of your element and you are not in the right frame of reference. What JayZeeBMT claimed in the original thread was completely wrong. He did need to apologize because he was completely wrong. |
|
|
| (902024) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 23:00:02 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 22:54:02 2012. How am I wrong? Are you claiming the Bush administration restricted funding of adult stem cell research? |
|
|
| (902025) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:01:02 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 22:56:00 2012. Please learn to read. Going back up the thread we can read: GWB banned stem-cell research here…Then read the difference between de facto and de jure and get back to me. |
|
|
| (902027) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:02:00 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 22 22:58:35 2012. I have to admit that you are the master of a circular argument. Even if there are no facts to support it. |
|
|
| (902030) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 23:04:34 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 22:55:23 2012. How many NSF/NIH proposals have you seen/helped edit?How is that relevant? Criminalized has a definition and it means if you do it you go to prison. During the bush administration people who conducted stem cell research did not go to prison, therefore it was not banned. Harvard has a 30 billion dollar endowment they could have used it to pay for embryonic stem cell research if they wanted. |
|
|
| (902032) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:05:31 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 23:00:02 2012. No. But adult stem cell research isn’t very interesting. Embryonic stem cell research is. And the Bush administration had definite problems with that. |
|
|
| (902036) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 22 23:06:58 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:02:00 2012. Nothing circular about it. You have no idea what you are talking about because you haven't seen the original thread. You don't know what JayZeeBMT claimed. You don't know how stupid he sounded/looked and how utterly wrong he was. |
|
|
| (902044) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 22 23:09:08 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:05:31 2012. But that's not the issue from the original thread. We are talking about old threads where JayZeeBMT was proven wrong and then he disappeared instead of admitting he was wrong and apologizing. |
|
|
| (902047) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jan 22 23:12:00 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 21:45:58 2012. If you are a republicant, you do the patriotic thing and stay home. Their non-votes will do wonders for Americans across the nation. |
|
|
| (902050) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 23:13:01 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:01:02 2012. 1) He didn’t say banned he said criminalized.2) Banned has meaning and it doesn’t include not funding something. 3) Even using absurd definition of banned its not true since there were never any restrictions on adult stem cell research and the AIDS patient he was talking about was cured using adult stem cell research. 4) If a republican claimed that the Obama administration banned Christmas trees would you think that statement is true or false? |
|
|
| (902066) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 23:17:53 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:05:31 2012. That’s not relevant he inaccurately stated that all stem cell research was banned, even using your twisted definition of banned his claim that all stem cell research has criminalized was inaccurate. |
|
|
| (902069) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 23:19:01 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:02:00 2012. Using the correct definition of a word is now circular reasoning? |
|
|
| (902115) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 22 23:37:02 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by DAnd124 on Sun Jan 22 23:19:01 2012. According to the new loser JohnL. He used to be cool though. |
|
|
| (902165) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by JohnL on Mon Jan 23 00:33:25 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Sun Jan 22 23:01:02 2012. Yawn. My last word on the subject. |
|
|
| (902167) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by DAnd124 on Mon Jan 23 00:36:47 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by JohnL on Mon Jan 23 00:33:25 2012. So after being proven wrong you decide to withdraw yourself for the conversation. |
|
|
| (902169) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jan 23 00:49:08 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 22 23:37:02 2012. He still looks like the skipper of the SS Minnow. |
|
|
| (902177) | |
Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 23 05:43:40 2012, in response to Re: Romney's Problem, and Obama's, posted by DAnd124 on Mon Jan 23 00:36:47 2012. Seems that that's how JohnL now operates. He used to be cool. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||