|
|
| Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds (775193) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||
|
| (776006) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed May 4 23:24:54 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Train Dude on Wed May 4 23:23:00 2011. ayup |
|
|
| (776008) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 4 23:25:31 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Train Dude on Wed May 4 23:23:00 2011. i have made good points and you ignored them |
|
|
| (776009) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed May 4 23:26:01 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Olog-hai on Wed May 4 23:24:54 2011. IAWTP LOL ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ |
|
|
| (776011) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed May 4 23:27:18 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 4 23:25:31 2011. I never avoid a good point that you make. I just don't remember the last one. |
|
|
| (776012) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 4 23:27:37 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Train Dude on Wed May 4 23:27:18 2011. ok sure |
|
|
| (776014) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 4 23:28:25 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Olog-hai on Wed May 4 23:24:54 2011. ?? |
|
|
| (776016) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed May 4 23:30:09 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Fred G on Wed May 4 23:21:24 2011. Isn't it OBVIOUS? Heh. |
|
|
| (776019) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed May 4 23:32:20 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 4 23:28:25 2011. I think they're both trying to show us the PROFF that they're libs. :) |
|
|
| (776024) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 4 23:34:27 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed May 4 23:32:20 2011. hah ! yeah |
|
|
| (776048) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Thu May 5 00:00:20 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed May 4 23:34:27 2011. So is that what "??" means? |
|
|
| (776081) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu May 5 05:55:13 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed May 4 22:57:48 2011. Never realized that this was even more important than Bin Hidin' but leave it to OTchat ... heh.Ah yes, typical Subchat....loose an argument, and then say, "Didn't realize it was important", to lessen the sting. |
|
|
| (776082) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu May 5 05:57:28 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Easy on Wed May 4 23:04:38 2011. In Florida there's lots of Black women that do housekeeping. In other states there's plenty of white women doing housekeeping. I would have said the same thing no matter where this bill appeared and call it out on it's stupidity. Nothing to do with race. Although when people like SMAZ can't come up with anything better to say, they play the race card. |
|
|
| (776110) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 5 07:43:51 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu May 5 05:55:13 2011. "Better than the, "I don't take this chit seriously like you do!" |
|
|
| (776112) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu May 5 07:44:41 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu May 5 05:55:13 2011. No, that's just Selkirk's usual line. |
|
|
| (776155) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu May 5 10:23:02 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Fred G on Wed May 4 23:21:24 2011. If Train Dude is a liberal, I'm the Pope and this post is being typed in Vatican City. :-) |
|
|
| (776232) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 5 15:41:05 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu May 5 05:55:13 2011. Yay ... right wing scores!Now how about that price of oil? :) |
|
|
| (776240) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 5 15:49:06 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 5 15:41:05 2011. It's Bush's fault. You have said so over and over |
|
|
| (776264) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 5 16:19:08 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu May 5 10:23:02 2011. Considering the way he's always pissing and moaning, it's obvious that he's to the left of Cindy Sheehan who actually gave it a rest every now and then. :) |
|
|
| (776270) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 5 16:25:19 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Train Dude on Thu May 5 15:49:06 2011. False.It's CLINTON'S fault! :) |
|
|
| (776498) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri May 6 06:49:26 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Train Dude on Wed May 4 22:28:22 2011. Exactly. They also should be banning stoves in restaurant kitchens too, after all, some worker may get steam in their eyes, and stoves can get hot and burn you. They should be using safer microwaves instead. |
|
|
| (776500) | |
Re: Does Nancy Pelosi Support: Cali. bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri May 6 06:52:03 2011, in response to Re: Does Nancy Pelosi Support: Cali. bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by bingbong on Wed May 4 21:26:56 2011. LOL, my 2nd job, seasonal, requires heavy physical labor. I work that job for 4 hours every day after my regular job, and my two days off each week for 12 hours. Don't f'in talk to me about what's "heavy physical labor", if you only know what I do to break my ass every week to make a living.And my first job isn't a "financial" job. |
|
|
| (776504) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 07:15:29 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri May 6 06:49:26 2011. Workplace safety is always a big joke to you pencil pushers but to those of us who get our hands dirty it's important.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (776505) | |
Re: Does Nancy Pelosi Support: Cali. bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 07:18:22 2011, in response to Re: Does Nancy Pelosi Support: Cali. bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri May 6 06:52:03 2011. LOL I called you a "pencil pusher" in another post. I retract that.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (776512) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri May 6 09:16:02 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 07:15:29 2011. No but I'm sure that in a 2 man operation like RM&M it's only safety that matters, right? Most large organizations put a very high premium on safety. My facility went 14 months without a lost time accident in 2009. And for the record, some pencil pushers came up through the ranks and earned their jobs |
|
|
| (776514) | |
Re: Does Nancy Pelosi Support: Cali. bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri May 6 09:25:18 2011, in response to Re: Does Nancy Pelosi Support: Cali. bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 07:18:22 2011. Haha, nah, a job like that would drive me crazy. My seasonal job is only about 6 or 7 months out of the year (broken up so it's not all in a row) in addition to my real full regular job. |
|
|
| (776515) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri May 6 09:25:53 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 07:15:29 2011. If you would only see what my hands look like right now. |
|
|
| (776518) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 09:28:14 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Train Dude on Fri May 6 09:16:02 2011. We agree that it's silly to dismiss job safety then.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (776520) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 09:29:26 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Fri May 6 09:25:53 2011. Haha, mine too. And I'm going to clean up so I can be a plumber today.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (776522) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Fri May 6 09:31:49 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 09:28:14 2011. Absolutely but I've also dealt with a very "pro-active" union that often used safety and work rules to further other labor issues. One must be competent enough to know the difference. |
|
|
| (776529) | |
Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 6 09:46:19 2011, in response to Re: California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds, posted by Train Dude on Fri May 6 09:31:49 2011. I agree with you. "Safety" is a buzz word that you hear often. Don't want to automate? "There are safety issues assocated with this process".your pal, Fred |
|
|
|
Page 5 of 5 |
||