Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(764672)

view threaded

ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote "yes" on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:44:22 2011

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2011/04/13/arizona-senate-passes-obama-birther.html

Arizona Senate passes Obama birther bill after boost from Donald Trump
Phoenix Business Journal - by Mike Sunnucks
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 12:09pm MST - Last Modified: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 1:16pm MST

Read more: Arizona Senate passes Obama birther bill after boost from Donald Trump | Phoenix Business Journal

The Arizona Senate approved the so-called ‘birther’ bill requiring 2012 presidential candidates to prove they were born in the U.S. and are thus eligible to run for president.

The measure, House Bill 2177, is aimed at President Barack Obama and those on the political right who want him to produce a birth certificate proving he was born in Hawaii and not Kenya, where his father is from.

The Arizona Legislature passed the bill 20-8 on a party-line vote in the State Senate with Republicans backing and Democrats opposing.

The measure includes some changes that allow for other documents beside birth certificates to be produced by presidential contenders. It now goes back to the Arizona House of Representatives for another vote. The House previously approved the birther bill without new Senate changes.

The birther bill has come up several times at the Arizona Legislature. The measure has received a recent boost from real estate mogul and television personality Donald Trump, who wants Obama to produce a birth certificate. Trump is considering a run for president in 2012 and recently met with Arizona Rep. Carl Seel, R-Anthem. Seel is the author of the birther bill aimed at Obama and the 2012 race.

A candidate that can’t produce records proving he or she is eligible to run for U.S. president might be excluded from next year’s ballot.

Bill Text (birther part in bold):

Senate Engrossed House Bill









State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Fiftieth Legislature

First Regular Session

2011





HOUSE BILL 2177







AN ACT



amending section 16‑311, arizona revised statutes; amending title 16, chapter 4, article 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 16‑507.01; relating to presidential elections.





(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)




Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

Section 1. Section 16-311, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:

16-311. Nomination papers; filing; definitions

A. Any person desiring to become a candidate at a primary election for a political party and to have the person's name printed on the official ballot shall be a qualified elector of such party and, not less than ninety nor more than one hundred twenty days before the primary election, shall sign and cause to be filed a nomination paper giving the person's actual residence address or description of place of residence and post office address, naming the party of which the person desires to become a candidate, stating the office and district or precinct, if any, for which the person offers the person's candidacy, stating the exact manner in which the person desires to have the person's name printed on the official ballot pursuant to subsection G, and giving the date of the primary election and, if nominated, the date of the general election at which the person desires to become a candidate. A candidate for public office shall be a qualified elector at the time of filing and shall reside in the county, district or precinct which that the person proposes to represent.

B. Any person desiring to become a candidate at any nonpartisan election and to have the person's name printed on the official ballot shall be at the time of filing a qualified elector of such county, city, town or district and, not less than ninety nor more than one hundred twenty days before the election, shall sign and cause to be filed a nomination paper giving the person's actual residence address or description of place of residence and post office address, stating the office and county, city, town or district and ward or precinct, if any, for which the person offers the person's candidacy, stating the exact manner in which the person desires to have the person's name printed on the official ballot pursuant to subsection G and giving the date of the election.� A candidate for office shall reside at the time of filing in the county, city, town, district, ward or precinct which that the person proposes to represent.

C. Notwithstanding subsection B to the contrary, any city or town may adopt by ordinance for its elections the time frame provided in subsection A for filing nomination petitions.� Such ordinance shall be adopted not less than one hundred twenty days before the first election to which it applies.

D. All persons desiring to become a candidate shall file with the nomination paper provided for in subsection A an affidavit, which shall be printed in a form prescribed by the secretary of state.� The affidavit shall include facts sufficient to show that, other than the residency requirement provided in subsection A, the candidate will be qualified at the time of election to hold the office the person seeks.� The affidavit shall include references to and attachment of all documents necessary to show that the person will be qualified at the time of the election to hold the office the person seeks.

E. The nomination paper of a candidate for the office of United States senator or representative in Congress, for the office of presidential elector or for a state office, including a member of the legislature, or for any other office for which the electors of the entire state or a subdivision of the state greater than a county are entitled to vote, shall be filed with the secretary of state no later than 5:00 p.m. on the last date for filing.

F. The nomination paper of a candidate for superior court judge or for a county, district and precinct office for which the electors of a county or a subdivision of a county other than an incorporated city or town are entitled to vote shall be filed with the county elections officer no later than 5:00 p.m. on the last date for filing as prescribed by subsection A.� The nomination paper of a candidate for a city or town office shall be filed with the city or town clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. on the last date for filing.� The nomination paper of a candidate for school district office shall be filed with the county school superintendent no later than 5:00 p.m. on the last date for filing.

G. The nomination paper shall include the exact manner in which the candidate desires to have the person's name printed on the official ballot and shall be limited to the candidate's surname and given name or names, an abbreviated version of such names or appropriate initials such as "Bob" for "Robert", "Jim" for "James", "Wm." for "William" or "S." for "Samuel". Nicknames are permissible, but in no event shall nicknames, abbreviated versions or initials of given names suggest reference to professional, fraternal, religious or military titles.� No other descriptive name or names shall be printed on the official ballot, except as provided in this section. Candidates' abbreviated names or nicknames may be printed within quotation marks.� The candidate's surname shall be printed first, followed by the given name or names.

H. A person who does not file a timely nomination paper that complies with this section is not eligible to have the person's name printed on the official ballot for that office. The filing officer shall not accept the nomination paper of a candidate for state or local office unless the person provides or has provided all of the following:

1. The nomination petition required by this title.

2. A political committee statement of organization or the five hundred dollar threshold exemption statement for that office.

3. The financial disclosure statement as prescribed for candidates for that office.

4. The affidavit and attachments prescribed in subsection D.

I. For the purposes of this title:

1. "Election district" means the state, any county, city, town, precinct or other political subdivision or a special district which that is not a political subdivision, which that is authorized by statute to conduct an election and which that is authorized or required to conduct its election in accordance with this title.

2. "Nomination paper" means the form filed with the appropriate office by a person wishing to declare the person's intent to become a candidate for a particular political office.

Sec. 2. Title 16, chapter 4, article 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 16-507.01, to read:

16-507.01. Presidential candidates; affidavit of qualifications; enforcement

A. The national political party committee for a candidate for president for a party that is entitled to continued representation on the ballot shall provide to the secretary of state written notice of that political party's nomination of its candidates for president and vice‑president. Within ten days after submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the presidential candidate in which the presidential candidate states the candidate's citizenship and age and shall append to the affidavit documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate's age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States.

B. The affidavit prescribed in subsection A shall include references to and attachment of all of the following, which shall be sworn to under penalty of perjury:

1. A certified copy of the presidential candidate's long form birth certificate that includes at least the date and place of birth, the names of the hospital and the attending physician, if applicable, and signatures of any witnesses in attendance.� If the candidate does not possess a long form birth certificate as required by this paragraph, the candidate may attach two or more of the following documents that shall take the place of the long form birth certificate if the candidate swears to their authenticity and validity and the documents contain enough information for the secretary of state to determine if the candidate meets the requirements prescribed in article II, section 1, constitution of the United States:

(a) Early baptismal or circumcision certificate.

(b) Hospital birth record.

(c) Postpartum medical record for the mother or child signed by the doctor or midwife or the person who delivered or examined the child after birth.

(d) Early census record.

2. A sworn statement or form that identifies the presidential candidate's places of residence in the United States for fourteen years.

C. In addition to the requirements of subsection B, the presidential candidate may also submit a notarized affidavit from two or more persons who witnessed the presidential candidate's birth.

D. If the secretary of state receives any documents in place of a long form birth certificate pursuant to subsection B, paragraph 1 and cannot determine if the presidential candidate meets the requirements prescribed in Article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States, the secretary of state may establish a committee to assist in the determination or hold hearings and submit any documents for forensic examination.

E. If both the presidential candidate and the national political party committee for that candidate fail to submit and swear to the documents prescribed in this section, the secretary of state shall not place that presidential candidate's name on the ballot in this state.� If the candidate and national political party committee for that committee submit and swear to the documents prescribed in this section, but the secretary of state believes that the preponderance of the evidence shows that the candidate does not meet the citizenship, age and residency requirements, the secretary of state shall not place that presidential candidate's name on the ballot in this state.

F. A member of the house of representatives, a member of the senate or any other citizen of this state has standing to initiate an action to enforce this section.


Sec. 3. Severability

If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable.




Post a New Response

(764675)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 13 20:47:22 2011, in response to ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote "yes" on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:44:22 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. At least they're doing something to boost Arizona's economy there. :)

Post a New Response

(764676)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:49:28 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 13 20:47:22 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They're not boosting the economy. This bill will be revenue neutral at best or revenue negative in likely scenario (especially if Obama is barred from campaigning here and the associated revenue of the campaign infrastructure goes away). The ONLY area of economic development this helps is constitutional law attorneys. The bill is so poorly written that a 3rd grader can declare it unconstitutional on FIRST AMENDMENT grounds (with the baptismal/circumcision language).

Post a New Response

(764687)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 13 21:13:23 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:49:28 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I was being facetious about it ... you'd think your legislature there would have more pressing issues to worry about, but just like the same characters on the national scale, THIS is what's more important than any of that. The people ARE getting what they voted for ... :-\

Post a New Response

(764689)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 13 21:14:46 2011, in response to ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote "yes" on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:44:22 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Wouldn't "Proofer" be a better term? Nothing wrong with asking for more accountability from our politicians.

Post a New Response

(764693)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 21:19:39 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 13 21:14:46 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Other than:

a.) This bill is blatantly unconstitutional
b.) This law seeks to give one party an unfair advantage in the 2012 Presidential election by attempting to discredit the candidacy of another party's Presidential candidate
c.) This law has ONE target: Barack Obama.

Post a New Response

(764694)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 13 21:21:02 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 21:19:39 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I see nothing wrong with asking for more accountability from politicians. Nothing. They all should have to show an original long-form birth certificate if the public asks.

Post a New Response

(764696)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by Easy on Wed Apr 13 21:24:00 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 13 21:21:02 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Suppose like me they don't have one?

Post a New Response

(764698)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Apr 13 21:30:35 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 13 21:21:02 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The original long-form birth certificate, however, cannot be released as per HI law...and it's not waivable. What would happen here is someone would sue, and the court battle would drag past 2012, allowing the Republican candidate to run unopposed in AZ.

Post a New Response

(764699)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 21:37:44 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Apr 13 21:30:35 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Actually, what would likely happen, in light of a suit, is that a federal judge would put a stay on the enforcement of this law. The state would likely appeal to the 9th Circuit, which would uphold the judge's stay. The state would then appeal to the Supreme Court which probably wouldn't hear the case until after November 2012. Therefore, Obama would still be able to run in Arizona.

Post a New Response

(764743)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 14 00:23:40 2011, in response to ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote "yes" on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:44:22 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
There's no end to the stupid on this. We have a black President; get over it.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(764755)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:00:08 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 14 00:23:40 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I agree. I believe that the thought would be that if they are somehow successful on knocking Obama off of the 2012 ballot, that they would be able to suppress the Democratic vote and ensure that they would be re-elected.

The govornor is going to sign this, unfortunately. My only hope is that it is able to be either overturned or a stay can be put on it prior to the 2012 election. Obama doesn't have the required documentation which is why it was worded specifically to exclude him from being on the ballot. However, Obama does have documentation that can prove he is eligible to be President.

Post a New Response

(764757)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 14 01:03:41 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 21:19:39 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
a.) This bill is blatantly unconstitutional

Yes, but not for the reason you think

b.) This law seeks to give one party an unfair advantage in the 2012 Presidential election by attempting to discredit the candidacy of another party's Presidential candidate

And?

c.) This law has ONE target: Barack Obama.

No, it's main target is the next potential Barack Obama.

If he's a citizen, release the long form and this entire law is moot.

Post a New Response

(764758)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by chicagomotorman on Thu Apr 14 01:03:48 2011, in response to ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote "yes" on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:44:22 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Good.

Post a New Response

(764759)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:06:21 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 13 21:14:46 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No. Here's the problem with this law. In order to be on the Arizona ballot, according to the law, one has to have:

a.) A long form birth certificate

or TWO of the following:
b.) Early baptismal or circumcision certificate.
C.) Hospital birth record.
d.) Postpartum medical record for the mother or child signed by the doctor or midwife or the person who delivered or examined the child after birth.
e.) Early census record.

Due to Hawaii law, Obama can't get a.) and probably won't be able to provide TWO of b.), c.), d.), or e.). Therefore, Arizona has placed an additional qualification on becoming President that excludes Obama from being listed on the ballot (or written in) yet Obama still meets the Constitutional requirements to serve as President of the United States. This fact alone should invalidate the law as unconstitutional. It has nothing to do with being a "proofer" or not.

Post a New Response

(764760)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:07:46 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 14 01:03:41 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Hawaii law prevents him from releasing the long form. The certification of live birth (which is available with a quick Google image search) should be sufficient.

Post a New Response

(764762)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 14 01:10:39 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:00:08 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
One can't get a contractor pass to work on a military base without an extensive background check. I daresay the background check of a Presidential candidate is even more stringent. This is really stupid.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(764764)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:11:34 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 14 01:10:39 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I agree. Also, it's quite possible that Obama (and other legitimate Presidential candidates) might not be able to pass the litmus test required of the law. That alone should invalidate it as unconstitutional.

Post a New Response

(764765)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 14 01:12:47 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:06:21 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I think Obama can get a.). Hawaii has issued contradictory statements regarding the issue. I believe he was born in Hawaii as Barry Hussein Obama and changed his name later in life. I also believe he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and became an Indonesian citizen.

Post a New Response

(764767)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:16:16 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 14 01:12:47 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The point is, not everyone born in the US would be able to get a.) and I'm not sure that they would all be able to get TWO of b.) c.) d.) or e.) and therefore the law is unconstitutional. It sets extra parameters as to who is/isn't a natural born US citizen that are not present in federal law.

Post a New Response

(764843)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Thu Apr 14 07:17:58 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 14 00:23:40 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Perhaps, seeing as Arizona is the new home of Southern racism, a military district should be created in the state under the Reconstruction Acts. Sic semper tyrannis...

Post a New Response

(764982)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Apr 14 20:12:24 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Thu Apr 14 01:03:41 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The long form cannot be released...and that's not waivable. Only the short-form is ever released.

Those on FreeRepublic claiming that the long form was available are fabricating documents.

Post a New Response

(764992)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Apr 14 20:41:36 2011, in response to ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote "yes" on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:44:22 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Why would they need a bill? I would think it's a given that one would have to prove his/her eligibility.

Post a New Response

(764994)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Apr 14 20:48:33 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Apr 14 20:41:36 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
They are setting up obstacles that they think would only apply to Obama---forgetting that very few candidates would be able to supply the requested documentation.

The same law would swallow up Trump too.

Post a New Response

(765000)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 14 21:03:03 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Apr 14 20:41:36 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Because they're idiots? Nah. :)

Post a New Response

(765057)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Apr 14 23:05:40 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 14 01:12:47 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
What "contradictory statements" has Hawaii made on the issue of Obama's birth? I posted a link to a report on the former Hawaii Health director, who examined Obama's birth records (including his Hawaii "long form", and confirmed their authenticity. The (Republican) Governor of Hawaii concurred in these findings.

Post a New Response

(765096)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by TonyG on Fri Apr 15 01:06:51 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by JayZeeBMT on Thu Apr 14 23:05:40 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The problem is that the State of Arizona is requesting that they be provided the long-form birth certificate (or TWO of a baptismal certificate, a circumcision certificate, and early census record, a signed statement from two witnesses of the birth, or documentation from a midwife) before they place Obama on the ballot. Obama, per Hawaii law, cannot obtain access to the certificate and likely doesn't have TWO of the other required documentation.

Post a New Response

(765131)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Fri Apr 15 10:44:37 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:06:21 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Due to Hawaii law, Obama can't get a.) and probably won't be able to provide TWO of b.), c.), d.), or e.).

Hawaii could conceivably change the law and issue certified photocopies again (after all, it's only taxpayer money). It doesn't matter, though, per subsection E of the law:

"If the candidate and national political party committee for that committee submit and swear to the documents prescribed in this section, but the secretary of state believes that the preponderance of the evidence shows that the candidate does not meet the citizenship, age and residency requirements, the secretary of state shall not place that presidential candidate's name on the ballot in this state."

In other words, if the Arizona Secretary of State is a birther, Obama is off the ballot regardless of documentation.

Post a New Response

(765146)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by AlM on Fri Apr 15 12:32:11 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Thu Apr 14 01:06:21 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Hmm. I guess I can't get on the ballot in AZ for President either.

I've lost (a) and NYC won't give me another copy of it.

I do have (b) somewhere, or could get a copy. The church where I was baptized still exists. But my birth hospital went out of business over 50 years ago, so I can't get (c). My doctor is long dead so I can't get (d). I was born right after a census so I would have been 9 years old at the first census in which I existed, which proves nothing (and besides census records are confidential for 72 years).

And just to add to it all, my mother was a non-resident alien at the time of my birth.

But I'm definitely a natural born citizen. I was born in the Bronx and I have a machine printed birth certificate with a raised seal from NYC that says so.



Post a New Response

(765147)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by AlM on Fri Apr 15 12:33:09 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 13 21:21:02 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
So you are saying I'm not allowed to run for President.


Post a New Response

(765156)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Fri Apr 15 12:56:18 2011, in response to ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote "yes" on Birther Bill, posted by TonyG on Wed Apr 13 20:44:22 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
A state law that dictates what the U.S. Constitution requires? Absurd - - let the Feds pass the law, not some right wing blue state.

Post a New Response

(765158)

view threaded

Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill

Posted by AlM on Fri Apr 15 13:00:51 2011, in response to Re: ALL Arizona Republican Senators vote ''yes'' on Birther Bill, posted by Jeff Rosen on Thu Apr 14 20:41:36 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I can't meet AZ's eligibility requirements, yet I was born in NYC.


Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]