|
|
| Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, (265402) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||
|
| (265904) | |
Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building, |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 29 15:33:02 2007, in response to Re: if 'SelkirkTMO' has left the building,, posted by Parkchester (East 177th St) on Wed Nov 28 22:42:48 2007. I think with his departure, its high time for the question "what's going on with this board?"Someone who once posted in here and left under similiar circumstances wrote to me about their take as to what happened recently said: The death watch is on! The patient's family has gathered and the clergyman is here since the patient is expiring--fast! |
|
|
| (265907) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 29 15:38:16 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Nov 29 04:54:31 2007. Posting posters personal info shpuld be grounds for banning. |
|
|
| (265917) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Thu Nov 29 16:27:19 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Nov 29 04:48:55 2007. I see we havn't lost ALL trolls... |
|
|
| (265922) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 29 16:42:09 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by R30A on Thu Nov 29 16:27:19 2007. I'd like to think of them as REPLACEMENT WANNABEES. |
|
|
| (265924) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Thu Nov 29 16:48:07 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Nov 29 04:48:55 2007. IAWTP |
|
|
| (265929) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by trains61 on Thu Nov 29 17:46:52 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Nov 28 20:21:48 2007. Agreed...And Bie too. |
|
|
| (265931) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Thu Nov 29 17:50:24 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by R30A on Thu Nov 29 16:27:19 2007. YES..You are Still here.. |
|
|
| (265936) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Nov 29 18:14:35 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Nov 29 06:27:47 2007. False. |
|
|
| (265938) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Nov 29 18:18:44 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by Easy on Thu Nov 29 18:14:35 2007. How? |
|
|
| (265942) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Nov 29 18:39:23 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Thu Nov 29 18:18:44 2007. I was speaking for myself not as a treopain supporter, whatever that is. |
|
|
| (265956) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Thu Nov 29 20:47:15 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by Edwards! on Thu Nov 29 17:50:24 2007. Nor you old friend :-P |
|
|
| (266003) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:41:23 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by R30A on Thu Nov 29 16:27:19 2007. ...nor heve we lost any short wearing mopheads. |
|
|
| (266004) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:42:29 2007, in response to Re: About Selkirk..., posted by Easy on Thu Nov 29 18:39:23 2007. >>>>.... whatever that is. <<<LOOK in a mirror. |
|
|
| (266006) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:49:52 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by daDouce Man on Thu Nov 29 15:38:16 2007. Not if the info is already availablre on the "net" |
|
|
| (266007) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Nov 30 05:51:23 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:49:52 2007. It was at one time.But it's been taken off. |
|
|
| (266009) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:59:11 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Nov 30 05:51:23 2007. It has???? COULD'VE FOOLED ME |
|
|
| (266010) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:59:18 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by daDouce Man on Fri Nov 30 05:51:23 2007. It has???? COULD'VE FOOLED ME |
|
|
| (266012) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Fri Nov 30 06:07:50 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:59:18 2007. Where did you see it?I couldn't find it. |
|
|
| (266053) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Fri Nov 30 14:51:19 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:49:52 2007. And most people can be looked up on whitepages.com anyway. |
|
|
| (266054) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Fri Nov 30 15:23:58 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 28 01:32:57 2007. Dammit, I'm on whitepages.com, except as O Jones. |
|
|
| (266064) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Fri Nov 30 16:49:37 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:59:11 2007. LOL! |
|
|
| (266329) | |
Re: About Board Policy |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sat Dec 1 17:21:52 2007, in response to Re: About Board Policy, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Nov 30 05:59:11 2007. You've also looked? |
|
|
| (266398) | |
Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 05:16:42 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. Unca Larry ... my most PROFUSE apologies for this sticking to your face as it has ... day after the "final episode," had to go out of town, and have lurked in to see the responses, and it's been QUITE revealing as to who those who still appreciated my visits and who hasn't. Knowing WHO particular people are (google is yer friend) made for MANY surprises. But that doesn't matter. Simply put, I had MORE than enough chit. And as I said before, if Salaam got tossed overboard, then WHY are others permitted to do far worse? Salaam did photos TOO. :(The "night of the episode" had me TRULY honked off at the usual singular suspect ... and so, I went in search of google (it's the demanded "must see" her) for a particular photo I remember seeing a while back of "monobrow" in a colored, embossed style "cartoon-like" graphic (which apparently turned up on his site) which really brought across the "monobrow" as one of my "I've had ENOUGH of this bullsquirt" to post. So I went to his insistent "google is your friend" and typed in: brian weinberg ... for my search. KNEW it would bring up SOMETHING. I clicked ont he inside google link for "images" and perused them, looking for what I had hoped to find. So MANY images I remember were GONE (probably him playing lawyer and threate4ning to sue given the outcome of all this) ... but I *DID* find ONE image in "google search, images" and I posted the link to what GOOGLE displayed! In Firefox, copy image location, go back to subchat, do the (img src="") and then dropped it in. So MORON goes and threateds Unca Larry to have it removed? Mister GOOGLE hisself? Ummmm ... reality time, people ... *I* went to GOOGLE. GOOGLE gave me the "location of the image" to copy and paste! I violated NOBODY'S rights, and NEITHER did Unca Larry by letting it appear here! Terrorpin is the ALWAYS "google is your friend" mouthpiece ... anyone can go to google, type in "brian weinberg" ... the only reason why it appeared is because the "brianandtamar" website was the location of the photo that google gave up. Find it amusing that having gotten the URL from reading here, that the PHOTO is now gone from "his" site ... but the reality that needs to be put forward is that *HE* was the webmaster genius that couldn't write out a simple web host file called "robots.txt" in his root folder that would say, "I don't want the contents of this site on google." Sorry, been laughing for days lurking on the hoohah over this. SHOWS what an "expert" the boy is. :( Don't want your website hacked by google? ROBOTS.TXT is your friend! :( OK ... THAT all said, the reason why I pulled the plug aside from expasperation with the boy is all the *HATE* here which is not only tolerated, but encouraged. Sorry, I live upstate. We LOVE one another, take CARE of one another, and WOE be anyone who crosses us. America, and in particular the intarwebs, are nothing more that promotion of HATE ... and I will NOT be a part of HATE. SURVIVAL is one thing, that season is now upon us upstate again ... but there is just NO reason for all the BAD attitudes, hate, labelling, and dissing of others. Terrorpin and his cluelessness as to how to have kept that googlepix I posted only shows to go you that the FEW people here with a clue are disrespected, ignored and dismissed. Most of them have GOTTEN the hint ... pics? So apologies to all, but I've simply had my fill of the HATE, the disrespect, the "I'm smarter than YOU are even if I've NEVER braked 10 cars" and all the other qwap. Sorry, I'm too WELL to play. :( LARRY, my apologies ... it was once again TERRORPIN who screwed up in even ALLOWING those pics to be googled. Bu Mister Know It All reigns supreme. And if HE and his lickies stay, then there's NO need for ME to be here to suffer his, and his strappies morons. No offense to YOU, Unca Larry ... but Salaam got tossed, and HE'S still here? Salaam was *FAR* more civil. :( OK ... I've said my piece ... the reason why I gave up that night was that despite many reboots, saved cookie login and all was that for better than 6 hours, I got an invalid account/password error each and every time I tried to post or correct my comments and explain further. Seemed pretty damned final to me whatever the cause, and the deactivation of the original was in earnest at the time. Disconnecting and reconnecting did not solve it, and the email server got a bounce from the address it was sent to, so the "I quit" email never made it to you, Unca Larry ... Just wanted to let EVERYONE know what the score was ... but the "off-topic antisemite" thing only causes me to think even more that this place has been taken over by absolute HATE. And while I can understand that the middle east (and now America) can't properly BURN IN HELL without hatred of EVERYBODY, I can truly see that the off-topic is pwn3d by political HATE, and the ON topic board is pwn3d by photos ... I fail to see what they point is myself unless there's some discussion. Alas, all we see here is everyone calling everyone else an asshat. Went away before, came back hoping to shape up a more tolerant and humored place. But no ... HATE wins. :( I'm sorry ... I'm just too WELL to feed anymore HATE. Here, there, whever it happens. If this board continues to be fed by HATE, I want no part of it, and that's what I rather ineolquently was trying to get across. I'm TIRED of hate, and I just don't wanna deal with it anymore. For those who INSIST upon hate, then lay down your soul to FEED that hate MILITARILY. If you're going to HATE, go DIE for your cause instead of yammering about it. DO something about it! But me? I've REALLY had enough of it, and I genuinely meant it. LOVE something, and I'll be there for it. But as long as this place focuses on HATE, I want no part of it. Where *I* live, there's nothing but LOVE, taking care of one another, and in a crisis, we all look out for each other. And when there ISN'T a crisis, we STILL do. God have mercy on ALL of you. :( Hate on? I don't think so. Anyhoo ... my "transgression" was the DIRECT result of "google is your friend" and a so-called "expert" who failed to provide a "robots.txt" file that said, "I don't want this public." Bottom line is Terrorpin's threat against OUR HOST was the result of his OWN "l33t incontinence." Can't PHUCKING believe the drama ... THAT is why I've given up. :( (OK, try posting now for the first time since I *WAS* locked out, lessee what happens) |
|
|
| (266399) | |
Re: About Selkirk... |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 05:28:32 2007, in response to About Selkirk..., posted by Larry Fendrick (NotchIt)-Webmaster on Tue Nov 27 23:01:33 2007. Well ... looks like Larry (as always) was fair dinkum ... but the only reason why I said "I was deleted" was because my login didn't work when I claimed it ... automatically, manually on other machines which ain't been here and had to manually type in user and PW, and it as very much for real then ... but then Unca Larry has NEVER been a problem ... I *still* can't believe that he puts up with some folks, but as to me ... I've had my fill of the hate. :( |
|
|
| (266400) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 06:48:15 2007, in response to Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 05:16:42 2007. Just to clarify as to HOW to keep your valuable pics unavailable to "ne'er-do-wells" like me, Unca Terorrpin ... since google WASN'T your friend, and why you bothered Unca Larry in the FIRST place...Here's HOW TO use robots.txt to hide all you've intarwebbed, since you clearly didn't know HOW and blamed Unca Larry for YOUR webmastering ... It works likes this: a robot wants to vists a Web site URL, say http://www.example.com/welcome.html. Before it does so, it firsts checks for http://www.example.com/robots.txt, and finds: User-agent: * Disallow: / The "User-agent: *" means this section applies to all robots. The "Disallow: /" tells the robot that it should not visit any pages on the site. Moron ... :( |
|
|
| (266402) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Sun Dec 2 07:21:00 2007, in response to Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 05:16:42 2007. Well stated 'Kirk. Gonna miss ya!Bill "Newkirk" |
|
|
| (266407) | |
FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007, in response to Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by Newkirk Images on Sun Dec 2 07:21:00 2007. THANKS, buddy! I'm hoping that ONE of these days, the HATE can be driven away for the WEAKNESS it represents. :(I've received MANY emails from friends, and words of support, but it's meaningless to those who hate. But waned to THANK those who have! I *still* feel VERY badly for Unca Larry, whose only "crime" was giving this gift to us. When Pirrman had enough, invited the survivors willing to "Selkirk's subway funhouse" on yahoo as a temporary respite until Unca Larry lit THIS place up. Out of both RESPECT for what a great job he did here, as well as low traffic on MY site. Heh. When that transition occured, all I cared about was the community of friends. So here we are, we look upon ourselvs and realize that the number of people willing to post shrinks episode by episode and yet the behaviors continues to shrink our "fellowship" as more and more people take sides, HATE each other, do the fanboy thing, and phuck one another with glee ... okay ... :-\ I *just* don't get the animosity and nonsense ... do RAILCARS care what yer affiliation is? :) We all REALLY need to SHUN the ne'er-do-wells ... (yeah, I'm the worst of all of them, heh) ... when you KNOW who morons are, who are poorly behaved, just IGNORE THEM! DO NOT RESPOND! (including morons like me who leave caps-lock on for an entire word, heh) ... if ANYONE find what they consider "bad" ... either IGNORE it and redner the post vanished, or put your point across ... with RESPECT for their stupidity. But NAME-CALLING and sloganeering is nothing more that proving that your lips move as you're reading. Heh. I'll leave it there. =) But THANKS bud! HOPE to have time when I wake up after the long trip to answer all those emails! Nighty, all. INCREASE THE PEACE, y'all! And PHUCK those who trash it! |
|
|
| (266415) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Dec 2 08:26:23 2007, in response to FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007. Welcome back. And remember to use that killfile feature programmed into your brain that God gave you. It's worked great for me and it can work for you too. |
|
|
| (266421) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:39:50 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by AlM on Sun Dec 2 08:26:23 2007. No ... I've GENUINELY had my fill of hate ... and sadly, with all the propaganda, that's all I see. THAT is what's making me crazy latelty. I;ve REALLY had my fill of hate and spin, which is WHY the republicans are *so* done. There ARE solutions. If Terrorpain is still our internet cop, I'd MUCH prefer Sharia law. I looks FABULOUS in a burkah. :)Sorry, too well to attend the ongoing hate. FIX that, and I'll gladly come back. But when folks won't even pay attention, and then attack each other, and then REMAIN ... wellllll ... too WELL to attend anymore. :( Sorry ... I was a SYSOP on the 80's ... NO PERSONAL ATTACKS, PERIOD. Things NEVER were allowed to linger to a level where *I* had enough of it. And I'm more forgiving than others. But hey ... THIS place is being recorded by google and archive.org. Heh. ALL truths will be there until they die. =P |
|
|
| (266436) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Dec 2 10:07:29 2007, in response to Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 06:48:15 2007. First of all WELCOME BACK!I never thought you'd actually leave. I knew you'd be in here looking to see what has happened. I just wish you'd writen a little more in plain english. Some people may not understand what you've said. |
|
|
| (266438) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Sun Dec 2 10:09:44 2007, in response to Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 05:16:42 2007. Well, thanks for popping in. Next time stay a while.See ya soon. ;-) |
|
|
| (266440) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by daDouce Man on Sun Dec 2 10:16:21 2007, in response to FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007. We all REALLY need to SHUN the ne'er-do-wells.just IGNORE THEM! DO NOT RESPOND! Shunning and ignoring the ne'er-do-wells is a good idea. I'm all for it. But what should be done for nameless people who push their 2 cents in every conservation? |
|
|
| (266441) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Dec 2 10:24:51 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by daDouce Man on Sun Dec 2 10:16:21 2007. But what should be done for nameless people whopush their 2 cents in every conservation? Just go on with life as if the objectionable post didn't exist. It's really very easy once you get into the habit. And it makes this board much more enjoyable. |
|
|
| (266443) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Dec 2 11:26:01 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:39:50 2007. Welcome back.Railcars DO have an affiliation....they prefer their pins in a particular configuration...a very electric relationship included in a handshake if I recall... 8-) |
|
|
| (266448) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Sun Dec 2 11:41:03 2007, in response to Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 05:16:42 2007. Sallam more civil than Brian?I don't believe it. |
|
|
| (266451) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Dec 2 12:20:54 2007, in response to Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Sun Dec 2 11:41:03 2007. It's happened. Rare, but it's happened. |
|
|
| (266452) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Sun Dec 2 12:23:27 2007, in response to Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by RonInBayside on Sun Dec 2 12:20:54 2007. I think the difference is Sallamm was ignorant yet arrogant and dangerous combination.Terrapin is just plain arrogant but not ignorant, just unable to socialize with people. Sort of like a blind deaf person who farts on a bus and doesn't realize the major inconvience he is bearing upon his fellow passengers. |
|
|
| (266454) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sun Dec 2 12:26:01 2007, in response to Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by Mr Mabstoa on Sun Dec 2 12:23:27 2007. Agreed. I fact that is the problem. |
|
|
| (266458) | |
Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...) |
|
|
Posted by trains61 on Sun Dec 2 12:46:07 2007, in response to Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 05:16:42 2007. I for one rarely come to the O/T board but read Subchat on a daily basis. Glad to see you stick yer head in the door. Heh.I humbly suggest you heed your own advice and ignore those you have problems with. I for one enjoy your commentary and sense of humor and want to see you and BIE around the place. Dispensing history and knowledge. There are plenty of times where I have bitten my tongue(not written a response) on matters concerning race and union affairs and/or Google comments. (The Traindudes comment on somebody shaving their wife`s back had me chuckling for days, although I`m not one to contribute to the hate) There are a lot of people that like and respect you and have the age and the wisdom to agree to disagree when necessary. Welcome back and hope you stay a while. Just my dos centavos |
|
|
| (266468) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by CAT218 on Sun Dec 2 13:46:51 2007, in response to FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007. I just come on here to see what everyone is up to. I like reading all of the interesting things everyone has to say and hate it when there is drama. Too much of that in real life. In fact, my wife belongs to this thing called "Cafe Mom" and they snipe on there like you wouldn't believe! Nothing like a bunch of sleep-deprived women on PMS to get the blood boiling. ROFL. Anyway, I steer clear of anything that may lead to a flame war because to tell you the truth, I like everyone on here because it keeps me entertained and it's nice when someone responds to your post and keeps the conversation flowing. |
|
|
| (266471) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Dec 2 14:23:41 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by CAT218 on Sun Dec 2 13:46:51 2007. Well don't be a stranger, and we actually do talk about trains in the Subchat side.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (266472) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Dec 2 14:25:27 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:39:50 2007. Oh well, at least drop in now and then for those great cameos.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (266475) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by Bob Andersen on Sun Dec 2 14:45:29 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by CAT218 on Sun Dec 2 13:46:51 2007. Anyway, I steer clear of anything that may lead to a flame war because to tell you the truth, I like everyone on here because it keeps me entertained and it's nice when someone responds to your post and keeps the conversation flowing.My sentiments, exactly. I've met too many friends through SubTalk and SubChat to jeopardize it by joining some of these threads. |
|
|
| (266477) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by CAT218 on Sun Dec 2 14:55:15 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by Fred G on Sun Dec 2 14:23:41 2007. Oh no I've been here a lot. I just recently changed my handle from 1C/Ballston to CAT218 to represent my new transit system in Las Vegas. |
|
|
| (266479) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by Jan K. Lorenzen on Sun Dec 2 15:18:45 2007, in response to FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007. Welcome back Selkirk. Looking forward to reading your postings to brighten my days while tied to the cubicle farm.Do you still want the t-shirt? what size? |
|
|
| (266483) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sun Dec 2 16:01:59 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:39:50 2007. I TOLD YOU...Do not respond to him..and all will be well. Do not talk to him..do not answer his posts...do not ACKNOWLEDGE HIM WHAT SO EVER..and you WILL BE HAPPIER for it. His supporters..? Give THEM the SAME TREATMENT. Glad to see you've returned. |
|
|
| (266484) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Sun Dec 2 16:02:43 2007, in response to Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by AlM on Sun Dec 2 10:24:51 2007. True indeed. |
|
|
| (266502) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYMAN on Sun Dec 2 16:52:37 2007, in response to FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007. Welcome back! |
|
|
| (266511) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Sun Dec 2 17:30:21 2007, in response to FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007. Excellent post, Unca Kev! You know I'm in yer Korner.....I will be in touch one way or another. |
|
|
| (266530) | |
Re: FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)) |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Dec 2 18:44:49 2007, in response to FOR MY FRIENDS (Re: Selkirk speaks (Re: About Selkirk...)), posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Dec 2 08:00:57 2007. I sent you an email last week but it bounced back. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 5 |
||