Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(2016901)

view threaded

Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 9 12:00:51 2025

In a suit filed by a white woman who was passed over for a promotion due to DEI, supreme court ruled unanamously 9-0 in her favor, stating that a white person does not need to meet a higher standard of proof than a non-white when proving that they were discriminated against because of race (or gender). Amen to that.

Post a New Response

(2016907)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jun 9 13:01:32 2025, in response to Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 9 12:00:51 2025.

Why is it Democrats 0? I wasn't aware that SCOTUS was on a partisan team, at least it shouldn't be.

(And this Democrat agrees with SCOTUS wholeheartedly on this case.)

Post a New Response

(2016908)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by rkba on Mon Jun 9 13:02:55 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jun 9 13:01:32 2025.

And this Democrat agrees with SCOTUS wholeheartedly on this case.

liar.

Post a New Response

(2016913)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Jun 9 13:27:40 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by rkba on Mon Jun 9 13:02:55 2025.

He's going by Israel/Brazilian court rules of so-called "impartiality". lol

Post a New Response

(2016914)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by rkba on Mon Jun 9 13:29:15 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Jun 9 13:27:40 2025.

it's much simpler than that: he's a textbook White-hating leftist.

Post a New Response

(2016915)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Jun 9 13:32:14 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by rkba on Mon Jun 9 13:29:15 2025.

Remember, the same forces that upended the rule of law (famously) in Brazil and Israel were the same working in the US in places like Wisconsin and with America's first black female justice actress.

Post a New Response

(2016919)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by rkba on Mon Jun 9 13:53:50 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by Orange Blossom Special on Mon Jun 9 13:32:14 2025.

tribesmen?

Post a New Response

(2016991)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Jun 10 11:19:10 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jun 9 13:01:32 2025.

If you hadn't noticed, the Democrats love DEI policy, so yes, this is a win for non-discrimination.

Post a New Response

(2016995)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 11:24:17 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jun 9 13:01:32 2025.

Bullshit. The democRATS ran on DEI in 2024. Trump spent several days shedding DEI policies and DEI offices from government.I suggest that you take off your political blinders once in a while.

Post a New Response

(2017011)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9—Democrats 0

Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Jun 10 12:25:05 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 11:24:17 2025.

I'm starting to wonder if he's Alexander Soros or someone like that.

Post a New Response

(2017012)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 12:31:34 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 11:24:17 2025.

SCOTUS agreed to hear the case in October of 2024, before the outcome of the election was known.

Post a New Response

(2017014)

view threaded

Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jun 10 13:02:02 2025, in response to Re: Supreme Court 9 - Democrats 0, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Tue Jun 10 12:31:34 2025.

And what does that have to do with the cost of Apples in Argentina? The American public was overwhelmingly opposed to DEI long before the election as exampled by the Bud Lite febacle.

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]