|
|
| Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination (1769931) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (1770103) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 10:55:56 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 20 10:45:07 2020. You lose. |
|
|
| (1770108) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 20 11:20:57 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 10:55:56 2020. Hardly. But if that gives you some fake comfort to claim victory in a subtrhread you were not even part of, hey, I guess you win after all. |
|
|
| (1770114) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 11:44:43 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 20 11:20:57 2020. How am I claiming victory? I never said you lost to me. |
|
|
| (1770145) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by DAnD124 on Sun Sep 20 12:52:15 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 08:36:26 2020. Marshall was much more solidly liberal than Clark who was a centrist, and LBJ was concerned about the court overturning his program that's why he did it. |
|
|
| (1770147) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Sep 20 13:00:33 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by DAnD124 on Sun Sep 20 01:49:01 2020. I'd forgotten about the trick that LBJ pulled. |
|
|
| (1770151) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 20 13:07:11 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Jeff Rosen on Sat Sep 19 20:37:46 2020. Hey, you learned to use the <center> tag. Ain't you smart.Thanks for admitting you hate the Constitution too. You'll miss it if it's gone. |
|
|
| (1770152) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Sep 20 13:08:44 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 20 13:07:11 2020. You'll miss it if it's gone.You mean, like our president just suggested? |
|
|
| (1770153) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 20 13:10:41 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Chicagomotorman on Sat Sep 19 20:24:03 2020. Since you need it explained to you, McConnell is using Democratic tactics against them. The Dems don't deserve to have "Repubs" play it straight (as it were) since they never do. And frankly, since the Turtle is actually going by the Constitution, nothing else matters, particularly since the law is the Constitution and not the personal feelings of this person or that person. |
|
|
| (1770166) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Sun Sep 20 13:21:57 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by AlM on Sat Sep 19 20:41:35 2020. Ruth Bader Ginsburg had three votes against her in 1993, so I assume that republicans have been supportive as well. It got a little more partisan with Roberts, who had 22 votes against. The. Alito had 42 votes against, so even more partisan.Republicans were more supportive of Sotomayor and Kagan, who had 31 and 37 votes against. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were very partisan. wiki |
|
|
| (1770169) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 13:23:43 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by AlM on Sun Sep 20 13:00:33 2020. I don’t think it’s nearly the same as Borking. If anything, it was like FDR’s failed court packing plan, but significantly shrewder. |
|
|
| (1770174) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 13:29:25 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by AlM on Sun Sep 20 13:08:44 2020. Olog-hai would love it if our Constitution were eliminated and replaced with biblical law. |
|
|
| (1770180) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 13:39:36 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Easy on Sun Sep 20 13:21:57 2020. Gorsuch and Kavanagh can be explained as resentment from McConnell stealing a seat from Obama. |
|
|
| (1770183) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Chicagomotorman on Sun Sep 20 13:40:41 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 20 13:10:41 2020. So Merrick Garland should also have been considered? |
|
|
| (1770192) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 20 13:47:18 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 20 13:10:41 2020. He should have gone by the Constitution in 2016, but he didn’t. He is a hypocrite of the highest order and so are you.I wish hell existed so that McConnell could burn. |
|
|
| (1770197) | |
Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 20 13:55:06 2020, in response to Re: My Take On The Possible Supreme Court Nomination, posted by Chicagomotorman on Sun Sep 20 13:40:41 2020. No. You still don't get it, do you. The context is the Constitution and preserving, protecting and defending it. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||