Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

First : << [11 12 13 14 15 16]

< Previous Page  

Page 15 of 16

Next Page >  

(1609757)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:18:38 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 17:17:33 2019.

Justice for Trump. Seizure of his properties.

Post a New Response

(1609758)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 17:19:35 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:16:31 2019.

Well we certainly know that we are on the right track when liberals start defending the likes of John McCain, who was the democrapic public enemy #1 just a few short years ago. Funny how that works.

Post a New Response

(1609762)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:21:39 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 17:19:35 2019.

I’ve always respected McCain and thought he was the best candidate in 2000.

Post a New Response

(1609765)

view threaded

Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up)

Posted by Edwards! on Sun Mar 17 17:25:08 2019, in response to Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up), posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Sat Mar 16 20:44:58 2019.

It never fails to amazing me how SELFISH people are.
How important "their bottom line is" when it comes to EVERYONE ELSE.



Post a New Response

(1609767)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 17:30:02 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Sun Mar 17 14:30:31 2019.

#cult45

McCain did the right thing

Post a New Response

(1609768)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 17:32:09 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 17:17:33 2019.

Another one of your “scandals”. The other ones fizzled

Your Batman villain name would be The Fizzler 🤣

Post a New Response

(1609774)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:35:06 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 17:30:02 2019.

Jesus Christ could come back to life and condemn Trump, and Republicans would defend Trump and call Jesus a socialist.

Post a New Response

(1609775)

view threaded

Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up)

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 17:35:21 2019, in response to Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up), posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sun Mar 17 17:07:35 2019.

Yes, I can agree with that.

Post a New Response

(1609779)

view threaded

Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up)

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:39:33 2019, in response to Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up), posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 17:35:21 2019.

Figures

Post a New Response

(1609781)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:40:56 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 17:32:09 2019.

They’re all Batman villains over there:

Post a New Response

(1609782)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Sun Mar 17 17:58:14 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:21:39 2019.

Uh huh. You and bingbong

Post a New Response

(1609787)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Sun Mar 17 18:05:28 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 17:32:09 2019.

Fizzled? So you've declared the investigation over after less than a month? No wonder why you supported Hillary.

Post a New Response

(1609802)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 18:54:46 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Sun Mar 17 18:05:28 2019.

No I’m rolling the dice on that comment. In all reality, I’ll wait until the facts come in

Post a New Response

(1609803)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 18:56:38 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:21:39 2019.

I was excited in 2000 because for a while it looked like it was going to be a contest between McCain and Bill Bradley. I thought for once we were going to have a decent election

Post a New Response

(1609805)

view threaded

Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up)

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 19:00:56 2019, in response to Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up), posted by chicagomotorman on Sun Mar 17 10:18:19 2019.

I'm being serious. That's an honorable thing to do.

Post a New Response

(1609806)

view threaded

Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up)

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 19:01:32 2019, in response to Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up), posted by Dave on Sun Mar 17 08:34:09 2019.

No!

Post a New Response

(1609809)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 19:08:17 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 12:20:57 2019.

Yep! She doesn't get it.

Post a New Response

(1609811)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 19:26:45 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 14:37:53 2019.

What?!

Post a New Response

(1609814)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 19:33:28 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Edwards! on Sun Mar 17 17:14:54 2019.

What criminals?

Post a New Response

(1609820)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 19:51:11 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 17:18:38 2019.

Um..WHY??

Post a New Response

(1609821)

view threaded

Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up)

Posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Sun Mar 17 19:51:16 2019, in response to Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up), posted by Fred G on Sat Mar 16 20:30:59 2019.

I did something special on my 60th Birthday, I retired from the railroad after 38 yrs of service. We had a 60/30 contract, so since I had 38 at 60, got me a nice pension and Railroad retirement benefits!

Post a New Response

(1609829)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 20:14:22 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 19:51:11 2019.

Proceeds of criminal enterprise.

Post a New Response

(1609832)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by bingbong on Sun Mar 17 20:20:12 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 16:05:04 2019.

He's not behaving like me. So that fact's useless. And no, not all that many know that.

Post a New Response

(1609836)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 20:38:15 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 18:56:38 2019.

Except he was the boogyman to the left in 2008.

Post a New Response

(1609837)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by AlM on Sun Mar 17 20:39:36 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 20:38:15 2019.

That's because they didn't know about DJT.

Post a New Response

(1609838)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 20:40:35 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by AlM on Sun Mar 17 20:39:36 2019.

No, bush was the boogyman too. It's whoever is Not a Democrat

Post a New Response

(1609839)

view threaded

Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up)

Posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 20:41:38 2019, in response to Re: White men are considered everyone (Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up), posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Sun Mar 17 19:51:16 2019.

👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽

Post a New Response

(1609840)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 20:43:18 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 20:38:15 2019.

No, he wasn’t. He was a mere opponent.

Post a New Response

(1609841)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Fred G on Sun Mar 17 20:44:48 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 20:38:15 2019.

Of course that’s our election system. Each candidate is the other sides bogeyman

Post a New Response

(1609843)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 17 20:58:08 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 20:40:35 2019.

Boy, was he ever made into a bogeyman. I remember all of the Goodwin's Law violations by the left from those days; it was not all that long ago.

Post a New Response

(1609846)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 22:18:38 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 20:14:22 2019.

WHAT criminal enterprise?

Post a New Response

(1609852)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by TRAIN DUDE on Sun Mar 17 23:14:57 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 22:18:38 2019.

No proof required. The claim is enough for F. Hugh Bailey

Post a New Response

(1609854)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 23:25:28 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 22:18:38 2019.

The Trump Organization.

Post a New Response

(1609855)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 23:25:52 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Sun Mar 17 23:14:57 2019.

No, it’s not.

You on the other hand, are the Fizzler.

Post a New Response

(1609856)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 23:27:20 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 23:25:28 2019.

That's not a crimal enterprise.

Post a New Response

(1609859)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 17 23:42:34 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Mar 17 20:58:08 2019.

Yeah; that was meant to be Godwin's Law, not "Goodwin's".

Yes, we were deluged by garbage like this, online and off.

Post a New Response

(1609861)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 23:51:54 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 23:25:28 2019.

Really? When was the trial and who was convicted?

Post a New Response

(1609862)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 23:53:08 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 23:51:54 2019.

So until a trial finishes you don’t know whether something’s happened or not? Hypocrite.

Post a New Response

(1609864)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 23:53:42 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Mar 17 23:27:20 2019.

Yes, it is.

Post a New Response

(1609867)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 23:58:49 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Mar 17 23:53:08 2019.

When a member of the legal profession calls someone a criminal, there is a different standard than when a layman makes an accusation.

Post a New Response

(1609868)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Mar 18 00:01:32 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Train Dude on Sun Mar 17 23:58:49 2019.

That doesn’t make sense.

Post a New Response

(1609873)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Mar 18 00:23:39 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Mar 18 00:01:32 2019.

Seems pretty straight forward to me. Give it some thought

Post a New Response

(1609874)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Mar 18 00:27:07 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by Train Dude on Mon Mar 18 00:23:39 2019.

To you, maybe, but I actually know how this works.

Post a New Response

(1609878)

view threaded

Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%

Posted by Fred G on Mon Mar 18 02:27:59 2019, in response to Re: AOC’s unfavorable ratings go up; net favorable ratings now at –10%, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Mar 17 20:40:35 2019.

It’s really silly to argue that only one side has the bogeyman, when there is Bill and Hillary Clinton at separate times, and Barack Obama for the GOP. And that’s only at the presidential/candidate level.

Post a New Response

(1613739)

view threaded

AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 1 01:25:20 2019, in response to Crowley Loses, posted by northshore on Tue Jun 26 23:22:51 2018.

One could be forgiven for thinking this to be an April Fool's joke. Even in spite of the track record.

Daily Mail

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez mistakenly claims Republicans amended the Constitution to prevent FDR being re-elected for a fifth time — however, the 32nd President DIED two years before the term limits law was written

  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) claimed Constitution of the United States was altered to make sure Roosevelt did not get re-elected
  • FDR was elected president four times and died in April 1945, less than three months into his fourth term — but the Constitution was not amended to prevent FDR from winning re-election
  • The 22nd Amendment, which sets a two-term limit for presidents, was only approved by Congress in 1947 — two years after FDR's death

By DAILYMAIL.COM REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 01:06 EDT, 1 April 2019 | UPDATED: 01:06 EDT, 1 April 2019
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has incorrectly asserted that Republicans in Congress amended the Constitution to kick President Franklin Delano Roosevelt out of office.

'They had to amend the Constitution of the United States to make sure Roosevelt did not get re-elected,' Ocasio-Cortez said Friday during a night hall event with MSNBC with Chris Hayes.

Ocasio-Cortez was referring to the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution, which passed in 1947.

The text of the amendment states, 'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.'

However, FDR served for 12 years as the 32nd president of the United States from 1933 until his death in 1945.

The amendment for the implementation of presidential term limits was made two years after FDR died, and was ratified in 1951.

While it was most likely a rebuke of FDR for his decision to ignore the two-term precedent set by George Washington, it could not have prevented him from running again.

Prior to the 1940 presidential election in which FDR won his third election, no American had ever been elected president more than two times. But because presidents were not subjected to term limits, FDR's third and fourth elections were completely within the bounds of the law.

People on social media both criticized and supported the New York senator.

'O** she meant as a result of, not in order to limit him. J— C— you people hate her,' wrote one person who sprung to her defense.

'Epic fail. Hilarious that you say people don't know history when you don't know that FDR was elected FOUR times (1932, 1936, 1940 & 1944). The 22nd amendment wasn't even drafted until 1947, nearly 2 years after his death. It was not done to keep him from being elected again.' wrote another Twitter user, keen to display facts.

It's not the first time Ocasio-Cortez has made factually questionable statements.

In December of last year she claimed 'Medicare for All' could be funded by $21 trillion in accounting errors by the Pentagon.

Post a New Response

(1613753)

view threaded

Re: AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected

Posted by Dave on Mon Apr 1 07:51:12 2019, in response to AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 1 01:25:20 2019.

Stupid is as stupid does....

Post a New Response

(1613784)

view threaded

Re: AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 1 10:04:23 2019, in response to Re: AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected, posted by Dave on Mon Apr 1 07:51:12 2019.

The stupid keeps rolling along here.

Post a New Response

(1613820)

view threaded

Re: AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected

Posted by Allan on Mon Apr 1 13:19:38 2019, in response to AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Apr 1 01:25:20 2019.

And the misses just keep on coming.

Post a New Response

(1613999)

view threaded

Re: AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Tue Apr 2 10:44:19 2019, in response to Re: AOC: Republicans created Twenty-Second Amendment to prevent FDR from getting re-elected, posted by Allan on Mon Apr 1 13:19:38 2019.

She the gift that keeps on giving for the Republicans.

Post a New Response

(1641410)

view threaded

Re: Olog lies again and should keep his mouth shut

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Jul 16 17:22:40 2019, in response to Re: Olog lies again and should keep his mouth shut, posted by ClearAspect on Thu Jun 28 22:07:45 2018.

What are you criticizing the Israeli Government for doing?

Post a New Response

First : << [11 12 13 14 15 16]

< Previous Page  

Page 15 of 16

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]