Re: CONFIRMED

Re: CONFIRMED (1562239)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]

< Previous Page

Page 5 of 8

Next Page >

(1562547)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris* on Sun Oct 7 12:05:28 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 7 11:58:27 2018.* No, because people will not be represented. Tyranny by the majority.
Post a New Response

(1562551)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by AlM* on Sun Oct 7 12:22:12 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 7 11:58:27 2018.* He'll be changing his tune once the Texas voting population is 50% Hispanic. Suddenly all those white votes in Texas won't count for anything any more.
Post a New Response

(1562552)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Oct 7 12:25:38 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 7 11:51:32 2018.* the Trump wing. List of people who post here and are in the Trump Wing?
Post a New Response

(1562553)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by AlM* on Sun Oct 7 12:35:08 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Oct 7 12:25:38 2018.* You know who you are.
Post a New Response

(1562554)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Oct 7 12:35:40 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 7 12:22:12 2018.* you're stuck in the past. Immigration. Segregation. Abortion. The next big fight is MGTOW vs Fat Feminism and #metoo. Women are a far bigger problem than an open border and men are waking up to their wicked ways.
Post a New Response

(1562555)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Oct 7 12:48:24 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Oct 7 12:35:40 2018.* Women are a far bigger problem So you hate Irish people in general, and women specifically. You have some really big problems.
Post a New Response

(1562556)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Oct 7 12:49:42 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 7 11:51:32 2018.* LOL "Trump wing". Keep pigeonholing and dividing people into groups.
Post a New Response

(1562558)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Oct 7 12:51:06 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 7 12:48:24 2018.* I never said a word about Irishmen.
Post a New Response

(1562560)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Olog-hai* on Sun Oct 7 12:52:52 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Oct 7 12:51:06 2018.* LOL, keep dodging. Just because you go silent on one matter does not mean you've abandoned it. And your implication that all women are liberal is sick.
Post a New Response

(1562561)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Oct 7 12:58:13 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 7 12:52:52 2018.* I never said a bad word about the Irish. You don't understand women.
Post a New Response

(1562562)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Henry R32 #3730* on Sun Oct 7 13:07:03 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 7 02:07:26 2018.* No one should be full blown $political_ideology, no matter what it is.
Post a New Response

(1562566)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris* on Sun Oct 7 13:26:49 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 7 12:22:12 2018.* Hispanoics don't equate to "Democrats" automatically. Far from it.
Post a New Response

(1562567)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris* on Sun Oct 7 13:27:53 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 7 12:49:42 2018.* That's what the left does and why they have trouble in elections as of late.
Post a New Response

(1562570)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris* on Sun Oct 7 13:30:41 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Oct 7 13:26:49 2018.* Actually that is another one of those ideas where Democrats segregate and stereotype "groups" into voter blocks, and another mistake they make.
Post a New Response

(1562571)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Oct 7 13:32:23 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Oct 7 13:27:53 2018.* Russian Collusion Children separated at border Kavanaugh
Post a New Response

(1562572)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris* on Sun Oct 7 13:35:53 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by LuchAAA on Sun Oct 7 13:32:23 2018.* Yes, they are a mess.
Post a New Response

(1562573)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by LuchAAA* on Sun Oct 7 13:37:19 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Oct 7 13:35:53 2018.* Amy Schumer is on their side.
Post a New Response

(1562577)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Joe V* on Sun Oct 7 14:01:26 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Oct 7 13:30:41 2018.* Mistake ? Flipping the Alabama US Senate seat their way ? Flipping the Pennsylvania 18th CD, that Trump won by 20 pts their way ? Came within 1 seat of taking over the Virginia State House ? Flushing out numerous Republicans in state races in Wisconsis and Kansas ? Looks like the Republicans took those places for granted, stuck in a November 2016 time warp., and even then flipped 2 US Senate seats and several House seats to the Democrats.
Post a New Response

(1562578)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Joe V* on Sun Oct 7 14:02:53 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Oct 7 13:27:53 2018.* What elections are you talking about ?
Post a New Response

(1562579)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Joe V* on Sun Oct 7 14:04:25 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Oct 7 11:40:36 2018.* Yeh it does matter by how much and where and shows your lack of analytical ability. You do not have an electoral college to cover you ass for another 2 years. That is ALL you won 2 years ago, and not by much.
Post a New Response

(1562580)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sun Oct 7 14:12:48 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 7 08:39:55 2018.* It was the very meaning of Democracy!
Post a New Response

(1562582)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sun Oct 7 14:41:59 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 7 09:09:27 2018.* It shows me that the Republicans were successful when THEY stalled and blocked; BUT the Democrats were NOT successful when they stalled.
Post a New Response

(1562583)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by JayZeeBMT* on Sun Oct 7 14:47:50 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 7 11:34:43 2018.* 14 presidents, nearly a third of all Chief Executives, have appointed SCOTUS judges during presidential election years. There's also that bit about that "rule" being absolute horse puckey.
Post a New Response

(1562584)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by JayZeeBMT* on Sun Oct 7 14:50:50 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sun Oct 7 14:41:59 2018.* 1. The Republicans enjoyed control of both houses of Congress, then as now. 2. That exposes, not excuses, their hypocrisy.
Post a New Response

(1562585)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 15:17:27 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Joe V on Sun Oct 7 14:01:26 2018.* You shall see.. .
Post a New Response

(1562586)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 15:18:22 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Joe V on Sun Oct 7 14:04:25 2018.* Don't need an electoral college "buffer". Remember, it 2as supposed to be a massacre by Hillary.
Post a New Response

(1562587)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 15:25:09 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 7 14:50:50 2018.* Biden From ’92: President Should 'Not Name A Nominee Until After The November Election' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVvxGa0zhWo&app=desktop&persist_app=1
Post a New Response

(1562590)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by JayZeeBMT* on Sun Oct 7 15:41:33 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 15:25:09 2018.* ...but Bush nominated Thomas anyway in his final year, and Congress confirmed him. 14 other Presidents have also appointed SCOTUS judges during Presidential election years. Can you cite the court case or federal law which, in fact, prohibits Presidents from appointing SCOTUS judges in their final or (re)election years?
Post a New Response

(1562592)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Fred G* on Sun Oct 7 15:45:13 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by mtk52983 on Sun Oct 7 11:39:00 2018.* Thomas should be brought up as the other Sotamayor
Post a New Response

(1562595)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:03:09 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sun Oct 7 15:41:33 2018.* I am not looking. I am telling you what Obama's VP said in 1992. Obviously whatever was done was legal, as it was done. If Obama wanted Garland so bad, why didn't he do him one of the first two times?
Post a New Response

(1562599)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Joe V* on Sun Oct 7 16:15:22 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:03:09 2018.* The point is the Republican Congress would not let Obama have a 3rd appointee. Why he did this or that one first or second is totally irrelevant.
Post a New Response

(1562600)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Joe V* on Sun Oct 7 16:17:38 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 15:18:22 2018.* Mid-term elections do not do well for the POTUS's party when approval rating is under 40%. Typical loss is 35 House seats.
Post a New Response

(1562601)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:34:52 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Joe V on Sun Oct 7 16:15:22 2018.* It's not really. If he's so great, he should have been before the other two.
Post a New Response

(1562602)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:36:00 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Joe V on Sun Oct 7 16:17:38 2018.* That is typical, but this presidency is anything but typical
Post a New Response

(1562603)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Joe V* on Sun Oct 7 16:38:45 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:34:52 2018.* It is not a matter of being "great" , but holding confirmation hearing on whoever it is well within Obama's term. Not being "great" is not a valid excuse for stalling 293 days. McConnell is a hypocrite.
Post a New Response

(1562604)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Joe V* on Sun Oct 7 16:41:40 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:36:00 2018.* Correct. Pennsylvania's 18thCD, once Santorum's seat, which Trump won by 20 points, Trump's clone of a candidate LOST. We know what happened to Roy Moore. Most people do not win by imitating Trump.
Post a New Response

(1562606)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:55:40 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Joe V on Sun Oct 7 16:38:45 2018.* Never said either way, but Biden himself said it was appropriate. In any way went, if it's really about Garland, why not before sodamaker or kaha ?
Post a New Response

(1562607)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:56:24 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Joe V on Sun Oct 7 16:38:45 2018.* Never said either way, but Biden himself said it was appropriate. In any way went, if it's really about Garland, why not before sotomayor or kagan? ?
Post a New Response

(1562608)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sun Oct 7 16:56:50 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:55:40 2018.* It's not about Garland. He picked Garland as someone who could get bipartisan support. That's the problem with Obama, always an idealist.
Post a New Response

(1562609)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:57:20 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 7 16:56:50 2018.* Sotomayor? Lol.
Post a New Response

(1562610)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sun Oct 7 16:57:57 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Oct 7 12:05:28 2018.* So tyranny by the minority is better?
Post a New Response

(1562611)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:59:06 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Joe V on Sun Oct 7 16:38:45 2018.* Ugh, auto correct?! Never said either way, but Biden himself said it was appropriate. In any event, if it's really about Garland, why not before sotomayor or kagan? ?
Post a New Response

(1562612)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 16:59:49 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 7 16:57:57 2018.* There is no tyranny. Each state votes.
Post a New Response

(1562613)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sun Oct 7 16:59:57 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:57:20 2018.* What does she have to do with anything?
Post a New Response

(1562614)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Sun Oct 7 17:00:23 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:59:49 2018.* No, each PERSON votes. Fuck states.
Post a New Response

(1562615)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Dan* on Sun Oct 7 17:01:26 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 6 19:12:42 2018.* A friend who is Italian-American took one of those DNA tests and the results came back with some Ashkenazi Jewish. He is Sicilian on both sides and can't figure it out.
Post a New Response

(1562616)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by Fred G* on Sun Oct 7 17:04:49 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:57:20 2018.* Didn’t he have a Democratic Congress when he chose Sotomayor? He didn’t have to play such bipartisan politics as he did with Garland
Post a New Response

(1562617)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 17:06:45 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by Fred G on Sun Oct 7 17:04:49 2018.* And repoblicans voted for her.
Post a New Response

(1562618)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by mtk52983* on Sun Oct 7 17:09:15 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Sun Oct 7 16:56:24 2018.* Because Garland was, on paper, the most centrist of the three and with a Democratic Senate he wanted reliable liberals. It would be like asking why doesn’t Trump pick a more centrist nomineee who would be a better Supreme Court Justice? The answer is because he doesn’t have to.
Post a New Response

(1562619)	view threaded
Re: CONFIRMED
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sun Oct 7 17:11:55 2018, in response to Re: CONFIRMED, posted by mtk52983 on Sun Oct 7 17:09:15 2018.* Okay then you answered ythe question. Why should do Trump anything less than Obama did too?
Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8]
< Previous Page	Page 5 of 8	Next Page >

[ Return to the Message Index ]