|
|
| Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread (1343482) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
|
| (1345239) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Feb 9 14:46:50 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 14:45:25 2016. You mean Marco Rubot. |
|
|
| (1345240) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 14:50:21 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 14:45:25 2016. They are all in the midst of a meltdown. The only ones who aren't melting down are Kasich and Christie, and they are totally unacceptable to the masses for other reasons.The 50% who don't want Crump are going to have to close their eyes and think of elephants and pick someone. |
|
|
| (1345241) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 14:52:36 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Feb 9 14:46:50 2016. That's much better. |
|
|
| (1345242) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 14:54:52 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 14:50:21 2016. The only ones who aren't melting down are Kasich and Christie, and they are totally unacceptable to the masses for other reasons.Correct and fully agreed but now think about that sentence for a second. That someone like Kasich is unacceptable to the GOP masses is enough proof that Trump or Cruz will be the nominee. |
|
|
| (1345245) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 15:03:30 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 14:54:52 2016. No. Rubio is easily conservative enough for them. And if Rubio turns into a puddle of molten metal they might actually turn to Bush. |
|
|
| (1345327) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 19:41:23 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 15:03:30 2016. And if Rubio turns into a puddle of molten metal they might actually turn to Bush.Who are "they"? Every single Rubio voter will turn to Bush if Rubio keeps short-circuiting? The "establishment" vote would only further fragment giving Trump's victories even greater margins. |
|
|
| (1345332) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 19:51:44 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 19:41:23 2016. giving Trump's victories even greater marginsNot if Trump's vote is capped. |
|
|
| (1345346) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Feb 9 20:00:02 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 19:51:44 2016. Yes capped at roughly 25-30% with a weakened Rubio at 15%-18% and Bush, Christie, Kasich and Carson all getting 5-10% each plus Cruz finishing first,second or third everywhere else with 13-25%. |
|
|
| (1345351) | |
Re: Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Tue Feb 9 20:04:54 2016, in response to Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 10:02:33 2016. I remember when the "ceiling" was at 5%. Then, as now, I'm not sure why I would really bother reading what a youngin has to say who is obviously overpaid. Have you seen these creeps at press conferences, they act like they're 4 years old, and their questions are as relevant as one too.I wouldn't worry though. Wall Street Hillary is crowned anyway. You can breath easy now...unless you're in the service, need a job, or aren't a Holy Muslim. |
|
|
| (1345491) | |
Trump ceiling isn't 30% |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Feb 10 09:03:39 2016, in response to Trump ceiling looks like 30% Re: Iowa Caucus Results Thread, posted by AlM on Tue Feb 9 10:02:33 2016. Title corrected :( |
|
|
| (1345533) | |
Re: Trump ceiling isn't 30% |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Feb 10 15:04:12 2016, in response to Trump ceiling isn't 30%, posted by AlM on Wed Feb 10 09:03:39 2016. ?What's more significant coming out of NH? That 2/3 of the GOP voted against Trump? Or that more than 1/2 voted for Bernie? Did you get ashes today? I'm going in a little while. I am ethnically and culturally Catholic. |
|
|
| (1345539) | |
Re: Trump ceiling isn't 30% |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Feb 10 15:45:38 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling isn't 30%, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Feb 10 15:04:12 2016. What's more significant coming out of NH? That 2/3 of the GOP voted against Trump? Or that more than 1/2 voted for Bernie?Both are significant, as is the fact that 34% of the GOp did vote for Trump. If that keeps up, he'll hold out to the convention. |
|
|
| (1345540) | |
Re: Trump ceiling isn't 30% |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Feb 10 16:10:02 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling isn't 30%, posted by AlM on Wed Feb 10 15:45:38 2016. Both are significant, as is the fact that 34% of the GOp did vote for Trump. If that keeps up, he'll hold out to the convention.Thanks. What did you give up for Lent? So yeah, I think Trump would have closer to 50% if he was a strong candidate. I don't like Trump. But maybe he can beat Sanders or Hillary. |
|
|
| (1345544) | |
Re: Trump ceiling isn't 30% |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Feb 10 16:21:41 2016, in response to Re: Trump ceiling isn't 30%, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Feb 10 16:10:02 2016. No he can't. You see, you're actually talking about 30% od republicans, of which they are 30% (approx) of the voting population. So it's nowhere near enough to win, even if the entire party membership turns out and votes for him in November.He won't win because he's satted so many tims he's not really interested in gain g the knowledge to do the job. By the fall, voters will understand this. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||