Vandalism by gay activists (1317873) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 1 of 2 |
(1317878) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Stephen Bauman on Mon Oct 5 17:54:33 2015, in response to Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 17:23:12 2015. This country was founded on acts of vandalism. |
|
(1317879) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 18:06:35 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Stephen Bauman on Mon Oct 5 17:54:33 2015. So you condone it? |
|
(1317880) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 5 18:13:38 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Stephen Bauman on Mon Oct 5 17:54:33 2015. Liar. |
|
(1317881) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 18:14:56 2015, in response to Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 17:23:12 2015. Not surprising.Certain segments of society fell entitled to behave like this. People talk about "white privilege", but it's these elements of society who think they can say and/or do whatever they feel like because they feel protected by the current mood in America. |
|
(1317883) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 5 18:16:15 2015, in response to Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 17:23:12 2015. they are wrong |
|
(1317895) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Oct 5 19:17:30 2015, in response to Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 17:23:12 2015. The activists are nasty idiots and your friend is a fool, probably a very nice fool, but a fool nevertheless. |
|
(1317897) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:19:21 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by AlM on Mon Oct 5 19:17:30 2015. How is he a fool? |
|
(1317898) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:23:15 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:19:21 2015. A Huckabee supporter. |
|
(1317900) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:29:07 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:23:15 2015. Is you name. Uh never mind. |
|
(1317902) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:33:16 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:29:07 2015. Good. You've finally figured out how OTChat works. |
|
(1317903) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:34:15 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:33:16 2015. Do you have a rule book? |
|
(1317904) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:35:49 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:34:15 2015. No, the rules have not been codified. |
|
(1317905) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:38:07 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:35:49 2015. Fine. I'll remember that. |
|
(1317907) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Oct 5 19:47:38 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 5 18:13:38 2015. What would you call this then? Alice in Wonderland? |
|
(1317910) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:53:54 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Oct 5 19:38:07 2015. Lack of codification does not imply absence. |
|
(1317912) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 19:58:36 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by AlM on Mon Oct 5 19:17:30 2015. so the activists were right?That's really what you're saying. No surprise. |
|
(1317913) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Allan on Mon Oct 5 20:06:26 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Oct 5 19:47:38 2015. Based on the subject matter in the thread title "Alex in Wonderland" might be more likely.But all kidding aside the Boston Tea Party was indeed an act of vandalism at least from the British point of view. |
|
(1317914) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Oct 5 20:16:29 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 19:58:36 2015. No, the activists are wrong. |
|
(1317915) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Oct 5 20:25:18 2015, in response to Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 17:23:12 2015. Unacceptable behavior. Still, using terms of ridicule like "he-she tranny" are also unacceptable. Suppose I said "in 1978, a horde of disgruntled hebes destroyed the 66th Precinct police station in an appalling display of vandalism and mob violence"?That incident actually happened, as Orthodox Jews stormed the stationhouse, demanding (of all things) better police protection, and led to the precinct in question being nicknamed "Fort Surrender", because, on orders from one PP, no arrests were made. A black cop, surveying the damage, remarked, "if my people ever pulled this shit, there'd be black bodies littering the motherfucking street". He was absolutely correct...this was 1978, after all. But my point stands...you'd be incensed if I used such a horrible slur. |
|
(1317917) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 21:14:11 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Oct 5 20:25:18 2015. LOL.Do transsexuals describe themselves as "tranny"? I think they even use the category name. |
|
(1317918) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 21:14:38 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by AlM on Mon Oct 5 20:16:29 2015. but................. |
|
(1317922) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 21:47:47 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 19:23:15 2015. Huckabee is a thousand times better than Obama, Sanders, Biden, and Hillary combined. |
|
(1317923) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 21:56:53 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 21:47:47 2015. LOL! |
|
(1317924) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Mon Oct 5 22:04:39 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 21:47:47 2015. Iawtlp |
|
(1317925) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 22:07:39 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by chicagomotorman on Mon Oct 5 22:04:39 2015. LOL! |
|
(1317926) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Oct 5 22:20:30 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 21:14:11 2015. No, transgender people don't call themselves "trannies". |
|
(1317927) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 22:29:17 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Oct 5 22:20:30 2015. well who calls them trannies?The men who secretly fuck around with them? |
|
(1317928) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Stephen Bauman on Mon Oct 5 22:56:25 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 18:06:35 2015. So you condone it?I generally condemn vandalism. I objected to your characterization of victim, assumed vandals and the act that took place. N.B. I wrote "assumed vandals" because the perpetrators of the Boston Tea Party masqueraded as Indians. There were also the vandalism related to the Stamp Act protests a decade before. Tax collectors' homes were looted. Should we condemn the founding fathers? Your story isn't believable to me. That's the reason for my skepticism. Let me throw a few curve balls your way regarding what- if's to it. Is the Rabbi's house part of his Schul? It's not uncommon for a church to give its minister a house because he needs to be on call 24/7. If so, did that house enjoy a tax exemption. If so, why was it being used for political advertising? Suppose the neighbor two houses away wasn't connected with the Schul and paid full taxes. Suppose he was a follower of the American Nazi Party and he put up posters on his property. What do you suppose would happen? Finally, suppose the police chief had Nazi sympathies. He objected on "moral" grounds to investigate the vandalism against Jews. He also would forbid any police action in this case. Wouldn't Mike Huckabee come to the chief's defense as he has to Kim Davis'? Isn't that poetic justice? |
|
(1317929) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 5 23:26:55 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Oct 5 19:58:36 2015. In as many as two centuries, those who use the term "activists" are those seeking to turn society on its head (i.e. destroy it). |
|
(1317933) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Nilet on Mon Oct 5 23:44:57 2015, in response to Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon Oct 5 17:23:12 2015. ...including a he-she tranny...Using bigoted slurs isn't helping your claim that they are the bad guys. |
|
(1317934) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Oct 5 23:47:07 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Nilet on Mon Oct 5 23:44:57 2015. I think JayZee addressed that best. |
|
(1317955) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Oct 6 05:00:20 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Oct 5 22:20:30 2015. So it's amazing how gays have gone from a hated class in society to the most protected class in society.I think it's because women took a liking to gays. It's cool for women to have a "gay friend", almost like a kitten or puppy. I'd also say women, mainly feminazis, see straight white male Christian conservatives as the enemy. So they formed an alliance with the gay rights movement-rationale being power in numbers. |
|
(1317958) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 6 09:05:36 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Oct 6 05:00:20 2015. Gays are not a “class” in the sense of “protected class.” |
|
(1317963) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Oct 6 09:31:56 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 6 09:05:36 2015. Weren't gays made a protected class in 2009. |
|
(1317965) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Oct 6 09:41:14 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 5 22:07:39 2015. I'm glad you are amused. |
|
(1317969) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 6 09:51:17 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Oct 6 09:31:56 2015. No, sexual orientation has not been made a protected class. Even if it had, “gays” would not have been a protected class because that’s not what class means in this sense. |
|
(1317970) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 6 09:51:57 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Oct 6 09:41:14 2015. Yes, Mike Huckabee’s candidacy is laughable. |
|
(1317975) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Oct 6 10:50:55 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 6 09:51:57 2015. Why? Because he does not want to pressure Israel into giving up land? |
|
(1317979) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Oct 6 11:12:05 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Oct 6 10:50:55 2015. Because he wants the United States to become a Christian Theocracy |
|
(1317992) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Oct 6 11:59:40 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Oct 6 11:12:05 2015. You are no conservative. |
|
(1317993) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Oct 6 12:04:20 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by chicagomotorman on Tue Oct 6 11:59:40 2015. Never claimed to be. I do not know why you are comfortable with a Christian Theocracy that would do away with your ability to practice Judaism in the United States. |
|
(1317997) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Oct 6 12:34:09 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Oct 6 12:04:20 2015. I really don't think Huckabee would like to prohibit the practice of Judaism in the United States. |
|
(1317999) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 6 12:37:30 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by AlM on Tue Oct 6 12:34:09 2015. No, but he does want to convert them to the "right" religion. |
|
(1318001) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Oct 6 12:45:57 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 6 12:37:30 2015. Oh, I'm sure he thinks Jews (and Catholics too) are woefully misguided and that their eternal souls are totally at risk of doom. Surely they can be persuaded of the right path!But I don't think he actually wants to close synagogues or Catholic churches. He just wants their customers to voluntarily depart. |
|
(1318002) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 6 12:55:40 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by AlM on Tue Oct 6 12:45:57 2015. Think of it as "self-deportation." Supposedly, such is perfectly acceptable :) |
|
(1318003) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Tue Oct 6 12:57:28 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Oct 6 12:04:20 2015. Proof? Quotes? |
|
(1318016) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Oct 6 14:54:19 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 6 12:55:40 2015. That exact thought came to my mind as I was clicking "Post Message." |
|
(1318024) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Oct 6 15:49:24 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 6 09:05:36 2015. LGBTQQI's? Is that what I should have said. |
|
(1318025) | |
Re: Vandalism by gay activists |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Oct 6 15:50:31 2015, in response to Re: Vandalism by gay activists, posted by LuchAAA on Tue Oct 6 15:49:24 2015. No, stupid. |
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 1 of 2 |