More Sedition from Tom Cotton (1311330) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 1 of 3 |
(1311332) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Tue Sep 1 11:25:58 2015, in response to More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 11:14:31 2015. Of course you don't like Tom Cotton. |
|
(1311333) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 11:31:08 2015, in response to More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 11:14:31 2015. From a real middle-of-the-road website. |
|
(1311334) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 11:34:10 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 11:31:08 2015. Do you agree with Cotton's actions? |
|
(1311336) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Tue Sep 1 11:44:43 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 11:31:08 2015. Be very careful here. The SMAZ is known to pose seemingly innocuous questions as a means of luring people into his trap which he will spring when least expected. |
|
(1311338) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Sep 1 11:50:30 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by cortelyounext on Tue Sep 1 11:25:58 2015. Tom Cotton has more integrity in his little finger than SMAZZA has in his entire body. |
|
(1311342) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 12:09:42 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by cortelyounext on Tue Sep 1 11:44:43 2015. Oh, he wouldn't spring a trap on a fellow veteran. Would he? |
|
(1311348) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 12:22:14 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Sep 1 11:50:30 2015. Lulz. Anyone of that stature promoting such behavior towards our governments policy should be tried for sedition. |
|
(1311349) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 12:32:01 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 11:34:10 2015. I am not going to judge someone's actions based on an article in a Liberal Rag.At least Israel is our ally. Perhaps we can talk about putting the interests of our enemies such as Cuba and Iran before our country's is within the purview of a President's power. Or do you feel a President cannot commit treason because he can simply re-designate an enemy as a friend? |
|
(1311350) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 12:46:07 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 12:22:14 2015. Yep, everyone in Congress should march like good little soldiers in whatever direction the President tells them to march. Congress should have no say in determining foreign policy.I see the Constitution means nothing to you. |
|
(1311355) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 13:10:39 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 12:32:01 2015. But you RWers love to condemn anyone based on Faux, Blaze, lardmouth, etc. Some here acts as if they live for it. |
|
(1311356) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Tue Sep 1 13:19:21 2015, in response to More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 11:14:31 2015. guess he pledges allegiance to other than the US ??, a traitor amongst our elected officials, a government for people (of what country). |
|
(1311357) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:22:54 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 13:10:39 2015. I'm not a right-winger, except compared to some people here. But stipulate that I am and tell me where I've condemned someone based on your pet peeve media. |
|
(1311358) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:24:14 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 13:10:39 2015. Do you think Israel is not our ally? Do you think Iran is not our enemy? Do you think the President is incapable of treason? |
|
(1311362) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Sep 1 13:40:22 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:22:54 2015. I'm not a right-winger, except compared to some people here.Hmm. A comfortable majority of American voters voted for President Obama in 2012. You have almost never endorsed anything he is in favor of. Doesn't that make you a right winger? If you were a moderate, wouldn't you agree with some of his positions and disagree with others? |
|
(1311363) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 13:45:24 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Sep 1 11:50:30 2015. Tom Cotton has more integrity in his little finger than SMAZZA has in his entire body.That may be true but at least I pledge my allegiance to my own country. |
|
(1311364) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by R2ChinaTown on Tue Sep 1 13:45:25 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 12:22:14 2015. Lulz? "How trolls keep score" . What bridge ate you lurking under? |
|
(1311365) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 13:47:13 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 12:09:42 2015. Cotton is also a fellow veteran.That's why his sordid actions are particularly contemptible. |
|
(1311366) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 13:47:54 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by AlM on Tue Sep 1 13:40:22 2015. Great post. |
|
(1311369) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 13:53:16 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 12:46:07 2015. No, Congress, aside from the Senate ratification of treaties, which we can all be certain mr. Cotton would never endorse any from this Presidency, has no part in foreign policy. Per the Constitution. Read it sometime. |
|
(1311370) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by 3-9 on Tue Sep 1 13:53:36 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 12:46:07 2015. If a Democrat pledged allegiance to a foreign leader, the Republicans and conservatives would have him/her thrown out of office. |
|
(1311372) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:55:55 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by AlM on Tue Sep 1 13:40:22 2015. Hmmm.... a President who lost his comfortable majority approval with the American people five weeks after inauguration (March 15, 2013) and hasn't been above 50% since.FWIW, I do agree with some of his positions, such as gay marriage, and the importance of meaningful higher education. Of course, on gay marriage I was opposed to the hypocrite's early position and am now in favor of his "evolved" position. So you believe that disagreeing with a strongly leftist president who has the approval of an uncomfortable minority of less than 45% of the country makes someone a right winger? |
|
(1311373) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:57:08 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 13:47:54 2015. Compared to you and bingbong I'm Savonarola. |
|
(1311375) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 1 14:00:27 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:55:55 2015. What "strongly leftist president?" We were talking about the US, not some other country. |
|
(1311376) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 1 14:00:32 2015, in response to More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 11:14:31 2015. I don't have the time/patience to read this wholething right now so can someone tell me if the author ever presents any logical reasoning for the accusations presented in ten beginning? Any quotes from Cotton that support it? |
|
(1311378) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 14:01:30 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:55:55 2015. Ahem. |
|
(1311380) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 14:02:41 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 1 14:00:27 2015. Seriously. I would love to see a strong leftist President get elected in this country. Hasn't happened since FDR. |
|
(1311381) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 14:02:47 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by 3-9 on Tue Sep 1 13:53:36 2015. as they should. |
|
(1311383) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 14:04:38 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:55:55 2015. If Obama could run in 2016, he'd get close to 60% of the popular vote.Maybe more depending on the opponent. |
|
(1311384) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 14:06:10 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:57:08 2015. That guy was insane and it didn't end well for him. |
|
(1311385) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Tue Sep 1 14:07:14 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Sep 1 11:50:30 2015. SMAZ in the Pocket. Here is our very own SMAZ pictured with his father who served with the 4th Infantry Division in the Central Highlands/II Corps Zone. This picture was shot during his assignment with 3rd Brigade Armored which fought in Tay Ninh Province. Said individual was taking part in Operation Junction City as part of Task Force Oregon in War Zone C. |
|
(1311386) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by AlM on Tue Sep 1 14:12:35 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 13:55:55 2015. So you believe that disagreeing with a strongly leftist president who has the approval of an uncomfortable minority of less than 45% of the country makes someone a right winger?He's not strongly leftist. His approval hasn't dropped because he suddenly advocated government ownership of the means of production, or some such thing. It has dropped because he looks ineffectual. The majority of 2012 voters considered his positions more acceptable on the whole than Romney's. The fact that you consider him strongly leftist, given the 2012 vote, says more about you than about him. The most "leftist" thing about him is that he pushed through RomneyCare, and voters went along with that. May I point out that personal income tax rates for the rich are way lower than they were under Clinton, even though he had a filubuster-proof Senate at one point. |
|
(1311387) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:19:13 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 13:53:16 2015. The Constitution also excepts what is a function treaty to be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate, not approved by one-third who uphold a President's veto.And where exactly in the Constitution do you see the President's exclusive power in foreign policy. He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments. I expect you to discover the above the next time we have a Republican President. |
|
(1311388) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:22:44 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 14:06:10 2015. Ah well, he must have irritated you on Subchat. |
|
(1311389) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:24:20 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 1 14:00:27 2015. Thinking Obama is a centrist is a good indication of a left winger. |
|
(1311390) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:25:32 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 14:01:30 2015. You don't usually do necroposts, bingbong. |
|
(1311391) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:26:19 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 14:04:38 2015. How many pennies did you throw into the well for that result, SMAZ? |
|
(1311392) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:27:42 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by AlM on Tue Sep 1 14:12:35 2015. You keep returning to the 2012 vote. That's even more of a necropost than bingbong's omage to a January 2015 poll. |
|
(1311393) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Sep 1 14:30:02 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:24:20 2015. You say that as if it were an insult.Calling Obama anything other than a centrist is a good indication of a right winger. Unless you call him a right-winger. |
|
(1311395) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:35:39 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by 3-9 on Tue Sep 1 13:53:36 2015. Give me a quote from, say, The Washington Post, that justifies the heading of this thread. |
|
(1311396) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 14:42:31 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 13:53:16 2015. Ignorant as always.The Senate does more than ratify treaties; it can refuse to approve treaties, amend them, or attach reservations. Congress has the power to declare war, which it has done four times, the most recent being World War II. The Senate’s Finance Committee decided that Congress should get an up- or down-vote on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a free-trade deal between America and dozen Pacific nations. |
|
(1311397) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:44:13 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Sep 1 14:00:32 2015. Just so we know what we're talking about, sedition is incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government or any action, especially in speech or writing, promoting such discontent or rebellion.Obama is not The Government, except in the eyes of his supporters. |
|
(1311398) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 14:45:37 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 14:01:30 2015. ROTFL! Why not pick an article from the week he was inaugurated? You are too funny.His current approval rating is around 46%. |
|
(1311399) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:45:54 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 14:42:31 2015. Trust me, bingbong will re-read the Constitution the next time there is a Republican president. |
|
(1311401) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Sep 1 14:49:30 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by bingbong on Tue Sep 1 14:01:30 2015. haaaaaaaaaaaa |
|
(1311402) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 14:49:46 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 14:45:54 2015. True 'dat! |
|
(1311403) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 14:50:31 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Sep 1 14:49:30 2015. Hey Stumpy, that's from January. His approval rating is back in the 40's now.haaaaaaaaaaaa |
|
(1311406) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Sep 1 14:56:33 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by Dave on Tue Sep 1 14:50:31 2015. hey davey from texass obama is dong greatnot on your right wing hate talk radio in texasss however and i am not a obama fan |
|
(1311411) | |
Re: More Sedition from SMAZ |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Sep 1 15:20:38 2015, in response to More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SMAZ on Tue Sep 1 11:14:31 2015. Politicus USA are a pack of antisemites. This screed proves that they are all in with Stormfront, as are you. |
|
(1311413) | |
Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Sep 1 15:21:02 2015, in response to Re: More Sedition from Tom Cotton, posted by SLRT on Tue Sep 1 11:31:08 2015. No, they're far-left radicals. |
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |