|
|
| Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate (1232976) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||
|
| (1233160) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by train dude on Sun Oct 12 13:05:16 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 12:36:26 2014. What about the 250+ that hairy reid blocked for political reasons? Is hevthe only elected senator or just the only one with a legitimate opinion. |
|
|
| (1233161) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by train dude on Sun Oct 12 13:05:20 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 12:36:26 2014. What about the 250+ that hairy reid blocked for political reasons? Is hevthe only elected senator or just the only one with a legitimate opinion. |
|
|
| (1233162) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 13:06:26 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 12:47:06 2014. You're lying again. The House went for an Obamacare delay, not a defund. |
|
|
| (1233163) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Oct 12 13:06:30 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 12:36:26 2014. There were a few regarding elimination of reproductive rights, a "personhood " amendment and some voter oppression laws that would clearly be found unconstitutional in there, IIRC. |
|
|
| (1233164) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 13:07:29 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 12:47:06 2014. You're lying again. The House went for an Obamacare delay, not a defund.And oh yes, Harry Reid did cause the shutdown. |
|
|
| (1233165) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Oct 12 13:10:15 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 13:07:29 2014. Wrong. They were told repeatedly NOT TO pull that defund ACA bullshit, yet they persisted. They were warned not to do that, they did, and what they sent up was rejected as promised for it. |
|
|
| (1233167) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 13:19:29 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by train dude on Sun Oct 12 11:55:21 2014. The House has voted to repeal Obamacare a scant six times. |
|
|
| (1233168) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 13:37:46 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Train Dude on Sat Oct 11 13:48:11 2014. It's hilarious how the left has switched to "shutdown blah blah blah" in the face of this. |
|
|
| (1233174) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 14:23:20 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by train dude on Sun Oct 12 13:05:16 2014. He's the Leader. He's entitled to set the calendar.If God-forbid McConnell gets in as Leader, he will do the same. |
|
|
| (1233179) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by train dude on Sun Oct 12 15:07:41 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 13:37:46 2014. Hilarious but predictable. |
|
|
| (1233180) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 15:12:07 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by train dude on Sun Oct 12 15:07:41 2014. Of course, the lib media has no impetus to redact its lies due to lawlessness in the government they shill for. |
|
|
| (1233181) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 15:12:23 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by train dude on Sun Oct 12 15:07:41 2014. Of course, the lib media has no impetus to |
|
|
| (1233184) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 15:18:46 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 14:23:20 2014. Heh, "Leader" and capitalized too. So you believe in totalitarianism instead of representative government. Thanks for confirming that. |
|
|
| (1233189) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Oct 12 15:54:37 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 15:18:46 2014. It seems to be frequent usage to use capital letters for the term majority leader.The cited reference uses both upper and lower case. |
|
|
| (1233191) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 16:11:00 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by AlM on Sun Oct 12 15:54:37 2014. Thank you. Leader is a title. To use "leader" instead would not indicate it was a formal job, instead of just a generic description. |
|
|
| (1233194) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 12 16:17:20 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 16:11:00 2014. "Na-na-na-na-na-na-na-na Leader!" |
|
|
| (1233197) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Oct 12 16:20:50 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 15:12:07 2014. LAWLESSNESS should be capitalized considering this administration's history. |
|
|
| (1233198) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 16:23:33 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 15:18:46 2014. Yes, obviously I believe in returning to the glory days of the Der Fuhrer and Il Duce, especially the latter given my obvious fascist Italian name.I guess it doesn't mater that those two guys adopted the word to cement their extra-constitutional statuses as "leader" of their entire country, while Reid got his "Leader" as part of his formal job title as democratically elected herder of Senate cats. |
|
|
| (1233199) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 16:24:13 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Train Dude on Sun Oct 12 16:20:50 2014. Can you cite some specific examples? |
|
|
| (1233200) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Oct 12 16:30:56 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 16:24:13 2014. Yes I can |
|
|
| (1233203) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 17:28:36 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Train Dude on Sun Oct 12 16:20:50 2014. Or at least put in bold.Obama's self-comparisons to Lincoln run very thin. When was the last time Obama called upon the nation to fast and pray? |
|
|
| (1233207) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Oct 12 17:38:35 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 17:28:36 2014. I'd believe it more if he wore a stove pipe hat instead of his dunce cap. |
|
|
| (1233211) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 17:45:39 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Train Dude on Sun Oct 12 16:30:56 2014. Good, I'm glad that makes you feel better. |
|
|
| (1233214) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 17:47:41 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 17:28:36 2014. When was the last time anyone called upon the nation to fast and pray? |
|
|
| (1233217) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Oct 12 17:53:13 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 17:47:41 2014. It appears to have been President Wilson in 1918. |
|
|
| (1233218) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Oct 12 17:55:22 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sun Oct 12 17:28:36 2014. Why should Obama tell people to waste their time and health? |
|
|
| (1233222) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Oct 12 18:06:40 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 17:47:41 2014. Does this count? :) |
|
|
| (1233225) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 18:19:52 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Oct 12 18:06:40 2014. Let's all pray, fast! |
|
|
| (1233227) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Oct 12 18:26:39 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by italianstallion on Sun Oct 12 18:19:52 2014. 
|
|
|
| (1233300) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 13 00:57:41 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Train Dude on Sun Oct 12 17:38:35 2014. The "put y'all back in chains" rhetoric of Biden in 2012 comes to mind . . . the Dems have been working to do that to not just blacks but to everyone for the past half-century. (And this from a fellow who had to ask if he would wake up "normal" from his brain aneurysm surgerynot a thing to mock, but Biden himself did it.) |
|
|
| (1235083) | |
Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 20 21:16:43 2014, in response to WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 11 13:33:30 2014. Other ones are Five Thirty-Eight and LEO, 62% and 69% respectively.WaPo "The Fix"
|
|
|
| (1235286) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 21 23:54:40 2014, in response to Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 20 21:16:43 2014. libs r mad bro |
|
|
| (1235289) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Oct 21 23:58:29 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 21 23:54:40 2014. Well yeah. Part of the reason one vote Democrat is because you're mad.It's an emotional vote. That's why people have to secretly donate to the GOP. Libs will come after donors if they could. |
|
|
| (1235290) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Oct 22 00:09:15 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by LuchAAA on Tue Oct 21 23:58:29 2014. AFAICS, people don't trust the GOP establishment to fund non-liberal candidates; funding individual candidates is way up. |
|
|
| (1235291) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Oct 22 00:18:52 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 21 23:54:40 2014. Liberals are actually quite emotional and even more vengeful. |
|
|
| (1235293) | |
Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Oct 22 00:48:54 2014, in response to Re: WaPo's electoral model gives GOP a 95% chance of retaking Senate, posted by Olog-hai on Sat Oct 11 19:14:53 2014. So you admit that Republicans are conservative? |
|
|
| (1235295) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Oct 22 01:07:44 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Train Dude on Wed Oct 22 00:18:52 2014. I just read an article outlining liberals' misanthropy on social media; they are very quick to "unfriend" (unfollow) someone who is not in lockstep with their views. |
|
|
| (1235296) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Wed Oct 22 01:15:53 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Olog-hai on Wed Oct 22 01:07:44 2014. +10 irony. -20 self-awareness. Achievement unlocked: Projection Level 2 |
|
|
| (1235297) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Oct 22 01:16:26 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Olog-hai on Wed Oct 22 01:07:44 2014. So that means that you and Train Dude want to "friend" bingbong and I and go out ice skating? Wow. Thanks! :) |
|
|
| (1235302) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed Oct 22 07:51:47 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Olog-hai on Wed Oct 22 01:07:44 2014. I think it's more to shut off the nonstop parroting of FOX propaganda. That and the baby talk (Obummer, zerobama, etc). It's kind of like a song you get tired of hearing on the radio so you change the station when it comes on.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1235303) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed Oct 22 08:04:16 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Fred G on Wed Oct 22 07:51:47 2014. Footnote to my post: It's like OTChat where a constant stream of retardation becomes mental sandpaper and you like to shut it off. How often can you read an Olog post or a flood of Chicagomotorman posts without rolling your eyes semi-permanently in the back of your head? Not to mention other droolers like Streetcarman. I could go on but it would mean reliving the nightmare and I'm trying to have a good day :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1235305) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Oct 22 08:18:50 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Fred G on Wed Oct 22 08:04:16 2014. Yeppers. It's imossible to just stand there and watch people one thought of as conscious endorsing policy that you *know* leads to their personal destruction and worse that of others NOT signing on to the bullshit, be it their rights, economics, health, on and on.... |
|
|
| (1235306) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Oct 22 08:44:53 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Fred G on Wed Oct 22 08:04:16 2014. Did you have to bring him up??? He's been absent for a while IIRC AFAIK IINM. |
|
|
| (1235307) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed Oct 22 08:49:24 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Oct 22 08:44:53 2014. Just don't say his name 3 times in front of a mirror LOLyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1235312) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Oct 22 09:31:06 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by Fred G on Wed Oct 22 08:49:24 2014. If the rumors are true, he'll be back near the end of the month to use up his allotted internet hours at the state psychiatric hospital and then he'll be back again at the beginning of next month to start using his new monthly allotment of internet hours. |
|
|
| (1235313) | |
Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now) |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Oct 22 09:54:05 2014, in response to Re: Other electoral models increase GOP Senate chances (WaPo at 93% now), posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Oct 22 09:31:06 2014. Actual observed events contradict Luch's hypothesis. But it was a clever thought at the time. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 3 |
||