|
|
| No riots. No protests. No lootings. (1223808) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
Page 1 of 7 |
|
|
| (1223808) | |
No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014 A group of black thugs viciously beat a white couple in Springfield, MO. Whites don't march down the street; don't loot local stores; don't start rioting. No white leaders come forward demanding justice. Is that any way to protest against injustice?Sheesh! *BG* Springfield beating |
|
|
| (1223810) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:41:28 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. "A group of black thugs viciously beat a white couple in Springfield, MO. Whites don't march down the street; don't loot local stores; don't start rioting. No white leaders come forward demanding justice. Is that any way to protest against injustice? "wow....and you called ME a racist??????? lol.....poor Davey.....you need to get a life real bad.....your posts have no real positive meaning other than fanning hatred towards Black Americans. Your post here is so obvious. You and Olog really do think alike......I wonder why......only for a second....of course.... Do you remember the Bensonhurst riots? eh? as for Whites not marching........tell me when WHITES have surfered a massive amount of INJUSTICES in America....then we'll talk.....til then....STFU |
|
|
| (1223811) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:44:12 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. No need for Whites to any of those activities since they haven't reaped the injustices as minorities have in America..... |
|
|
| (1223816) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 07:50:46 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:44:12 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1223818) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 07:52:26 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:41:28 2014. white people looted tooIAWTP |
|
|
| (1223819) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sun Sep 7 08:02:21 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. Were the thugs government employees?If not, it's still disgusting but it's not a parallel situation. The protests in Ferguson are about alleged government abuse of citizens. |
|
|
| (1223828) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 09:43:16 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:41:28 2014. Reading comprehension difficulties, Streetie? I guess you didn't see the *BG* at the end of the OP. |
|
|
| (1223838) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 7 10:33:58 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. Where were the government employees in Howard Beach or Crown Heights? But you still had the riots. What about Freddy's Fashion Mart or the Korean grocery in Flatbush. Time for liberals to stop making excuses. |
|
|
| (1223840) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE. |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 7 10:43:28 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 07:50:46 2014.  |
|
|
| (1223842) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by TUNNELRAT on Sun Sep 7 10:55:13 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:41:28 2014. refresh my memory,when did bensonhurst riot? |
|
|
| (1223843) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 7 11:05:45 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by TUNNELRAT on Sun Sep 7 10:55:13 2014. 1973. It as not a riot. It was a street fight between some white kids and some black kids. |
|
|
| (1223844) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by rkba on Sun Sep 7 11:06:09 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. No sense being one if you're not going to act like one. |
|
|
| (1223845) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 7 11:25:18 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:44:12 2014. Thanks for more racism, streetiecarracist. |
|
|
| (1223847) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 7 11:28:54 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 09:43:16 2014. I don't think he knows what BG stands for. |
|
|
| (1223852) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Sep 7 12:09:03 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. Excellent post. |
|
|
| (1223853) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Sep 7 12:09:52 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:41:28 2014. And you have a hatred towards white people. |
|
|
| (1223854) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Sep 7 12:11:05 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 7 11:25:18 2014. I very much awtlp. |
|
|
| (1223861) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 12:43:00 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by AlM on Sun Sep 7 08:02:21 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1223863) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 12:47:06 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Sep 7 12:09:52 2014. zzzzzzzzzz |
|
|
| (1223868) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sun Sep 7 13:00:35 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Sep 7 12:09:52 2014. You are the stupidest person here!!!! Go Away and we will all be happy!!! |
|
|
| (1223869) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 13:02:18 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dan Lawrence on Sun Sep 7 13:00:35 2014. IAWTPlol |
|
|
| (1223870) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Sun Sep 7 13:02:42 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun Sep 7 12:11:05 2014. You going to let us know what #awtlp# means? |
|
|
| (1223871) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 13:07:47 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dan Lawrence on Sun Sep 7 13:02:42 2014. LOLhe does not know |
|
|
| (1223872) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by busdude2 on Sun Sep 7 13:10:29 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 7 07:41:28 2014. Boo hoo hoo. |
|
|
| (1223881) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by FtGreeneG on Sun Sep 7 14:32:56 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. Fanning those racial flames I see. Is It a pastime on this board to bring up crimes committed by blacl folk? When there's a crimes committed by white person or persons not a peep but when a black crime makes the news it gets 24 hr coverage with the proud I told you so post like it's some sort of sick racial victory. You guys bring riots like it doesn't happen with whites. I guess some of you guys don't remember the G8 summit riots wherever city they happen to be in or college riots when the their team loses. Just this yr alone there has been riots at Colorado University, Western Michigan University, University of California Berkeley, the University of Iowa. Of course I can go on but I don't want to make this post too long. Of course when it's ppl of color it's blasted all over the media to fan those racial flames and stroke white ppls fears that black ppl are savages or latinos are trying to take over the country bc that helps sell papers and keeps eyeballs watching the news. Ppl need to stop throwing rocks in glass houses.PS I hope those assholes get caught and prosecuted to the fullest. |
|
|
| (1223882) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by FtGreeneG on Sun Sep 7 14:42:23 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 7 10:33:58 2014. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/19/college-parties-riot_n_5154048.htmlWhy Is Every College Party Turning Into A Riot? The Huffington Post | By Tyler Kingkade At Colorado State University last weekend, the hosts of a block party called 911 for help clearing out hundreds of attendees. Arriving officers were greeted by partygoers shouting, "F--k the police" and throwing beer bottles, according to the student newspaper, The Rocky Mountain Collegian. The same weekend, police used tear gas to break up a house party at Western Michigan University, as students threw beer bottles and attempted to flip an ice cream truck. A week earlier, University of California, Santa Barbara's, annual Deltopia celebration that attracted 25,000 people turned into a riot that resulted in at least 100 arrests and 44 injuries. At colleges big and small, during major sports events and local celebrations, students are engaging in violent confrontations with police, often leading to injuries and arrests. What seems like a surge in riot-like student disturbances is propelled, some argue, by the instinct to put everything online -- through Twitter, Facebook, Vine, Instagram and YouTube. But that theory assumes college parties turning into riots is a new trend. Iowa State University canceled most of its annual VEISHEA celebration this month after students rioted , flipping cars, tearing down street lights, throwing beer cans without apparent reason. Students also rioted during VEISHEA celebrations in 2004 and in two other years in just over two decades. Iowa State is not known as a party school, unlike its rival, the University of Iowa. That leads to another theory. Iowa State lacks a party school reputation and had multiple riots, while the University of Iowa had no riots and maintains a wild identity. The University of Delaware may be an example of the same small school riot syndrome. Thousands of University of Delaware students gathered in a frenzy on a Monday night in September as the popular YouTube channel "I'm Shmacked" rolled through town filming a college party documentary. BroBible's Brandon Wenerd reflected afterward about why UDel kids went wild. Social media was part of it, he concluded, but there's something else: I talked to I’m Shmacked’s founder, Yofray, on the phone this afternoon. He said that big schools know how to stay composed when I’m Shmacked shows up. Small schools like UDel, not so much. They tend to lose their shit. In other words, it’s classic little brother syndrome. That theory, too, has its limitations. Recent riots also have plagued the University of Arizona, UC Santa Barbara, Penn State and other known party schools. So if college students are rioting because of social media, then how to explain schools with a history of out-of-control partiers taking over the streets? If it's because the colleges that are not known for being a wild university are just getting excited and taking things too far, then why do riots still take place at flagship party schools? College students rioting in the streets have become routine during the NCAA basketball and hockey championships. After the University of Minnesota lost the NCAA championship hockey game this month, 19 people were arrested in a riot fueled by intoxicated students and fans. University of Dayton students rioted several times during the March Madness basketball tournament. The same goes for University of Connecticut, which eventually took home the national title, and where students lighted small fires. Following the University of Kentucky's loss to UConn, students set 19 couches ablaze in the streets of Lexington. An October 2013 riot at Western Washington University in Bellingham involving about 500 partiers took police 45 minutes to quell. In the case of most college riots, police say students hurled projectiles at officers. Many cases also include allegations that an aggressive police response fueled further violence. After at least 70 arrests at a "Blarney Blowout" riot at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst last month, students claimed police were out of control. Footage emerged showing officers spraying pepper spray at what appeared to be unarmed students: Back at the Colorado State riot, one student, Steven Meyers, said he stood near his car, making no sudden movements, trying to protect his vehicle. Meyers said an officer told him he could not protect his car and slammed the student with his riot shield. His girlfriend said she was knocked down by cops, who told her, "Move, bitch." A man in a University of Arizona crowd was shot several times with pepper pellets by police, while an unarmed woman student attempting to cross the street was blindsided by a Tucson cop in riot gear. The officer who attacked the woman, Sgt. Joel Mann, was given an "alternative duty assignment" after the video went viral. So is the college riot really the new normal? There doesn't appear to be a clear answer. "Riot culture has pervaded its way all the way down to normal house crawls," writes Barstool Sports, a blog aimed at college-aged men. "No campus is safe. No ice cream truck is safe. It's total mayhem in our country's colleges." More: College Parties, College Parties Riot, College Riot, Dayton Riot, Party Schools, College Parties Riots, College Party Schools, Uconn Riot, Iowa State Riot, College Party Riots |
|
|
| (1223883) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 7 14:48:54 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by FtGreeneG on Sun Sep 7 14:42:23 2014. |
|
|
| (1223884) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by FtGreeneG on Sun Sep 7 14:59:46 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Sep 7 14:48:54 2014. Of course alcohol is a major motivator in things like this. There's also the G8 summit riots that happens in every city they go(I don't know why a city would want to host one of those things...). My point is no one group has a monopoly on rioting, looting, violence or just plain evil. Let's all look in the mirror and get off our morality high horses. This world has some F'ed up violent ppl of all races. This world has angry ppl who take their frustrations out the wrong way of all races etc etc. Maybe we all don't agree but we should all work TOGETHER to find solutions and not point saying THEY always doing this or that bc the truth is if every group look in the mirror or look globally WE ARE ALL DOING THE SAME THINGS to our selves and each other. Violence, crime and pure evil is not exclusive to one group. |
|
|
| (1223891) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 15:07:56 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 7 11:28:54 2014. Probably not. |
|
|
| (1223892) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 15:12:00 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by FtGreeneG on Sun Sep 7 14:32:56 2014. Are you like Streetie, not knowing what BG stands for?Big Grin. As in, I wasn't serious. |
|
|
| (1223893) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by FtGreeneG on Sun Sep 7 15:15:44 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 15:12:00 2014. OOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHH my bad just when I thought I had all of these internet abbreviations figured out there's more. I think I need an internet online acronym dictionary or something...lol |
|
|
| (1223905) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by bIngbong on Sun Sep 7 16:45:18 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 15:12:00 2014. Which could just as easily be regarded as contemptuous. |
|
|
| (1223906) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 17:10:17 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by FtGreeneG on Sun Sep 7 15:15:44 2014. Don't feel bad about it. I can't tell you how many times I thought I knew what an abbreviation meant and I was completely off-base! |
|
|
| (1223907) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 17:10:47 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by bIngbong on Sun Sep 7 16:45:18 2014. Que? |
|
|
| (1223923) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by bIngbong on Sun Sep 7 17:58:33 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 17:10:47 2014. Hard to think someone, anyone, would approach rioting as a joke. |
|
|
| (1225658) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 08:49:19 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 7 11:25:18 2014. You call the truth racism cause you never had it so bad like me and other minorities in America. That causes you to be the biggest racist of them all here. |
|
|
| (1225659) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 08:49:52 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 7 13:07:47 2014. He never will know....that's the sad part. |
|
|
| (1225660) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 08:52:16 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE., posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 7 10:43:28 2014. wow......I see you dug that out of your toy chest in your room......looks like the sesame street bunch of toys.....when does it end with your freeky shit? eh? when mommy feeds your big mouth? eh? |
|
|
| (1225665) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 14 09:31:05 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 08:49:52 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1225667) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE. |
|
|
Posted by train dude on Sun Sep 14 09:34:23 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE., posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 08:52:16 2014. You couldn't afford most of my toys, Willie. I guess that realization will just reinforce your phony " victimization because you were a minority" scenario |
|
|
| (1225670) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 14 09:39:38 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE., posted by train dude on Sun Sep 14 09:34:23 2014. Can we call the phrase "white privilege" what it is yet? Racism? |
|
|
| (1225680) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 11:52:33 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE., posted by train dude on Sun Sep 14 09:34:23 2014. "You couldn't afford most of my toys, Willie."Not sure who your "Willie" is.....maybe that's a invisible playmate from down the block.....good for you! lol " I guess that realization will just reinforce your phony " victimization because you were a minority" scenario" Where did you learn such foolish crap? at school? or when you were a tortured leach at the MTA? eh? |
|
|
| (1225681) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings = WHITE PRIVILEGE. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 11:56:26 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 14 09:39:38 2014. "Can we call the phrase "white privilege" what it is yet? Racism? "WHY DON'T YOU FIRST EXPLAIN WHY YOU WERE SO SUPPORTIVE OF WHITES IN SOUTH AFRICA IN VARIOUS POSTS? THAT IS PURE RACIST TO TAG ALONG WITH THE OPPRESSORS OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY IN THAT COUNTRY: http://www.subchat.com/otchat/read.asp?Id=915920 YOU REALLY HATE MINORITORIES AND THEIR PLIGHT AGAINST THE OPPRESSERS. |
|
|
| (1225682) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 11:56:47 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 14 09:31:05 2014. THANKS |
|
|
| (1225684) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 12:02:07 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Olog-hai on Sun Sep 14 09:39:38 2014. IF YOU DON'T THINK THIS IS RACIST, THEN YOU ARE WORSE OFF AS A PERSON THAN I CAN IMAGINE:"Whites don't march down the street; don't loot local stores; don't start rioting. No white leaders come forward demanding justice. Is that any way to protest against injustice?" |
|
|
| (1225688) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 12:17:15 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by rkba on Sun Sep 7 11:06:09 2014. Did you learn at college or at the KKK rally? or both. |
|
|
| (1225691) | |
Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings. |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 12:26:34 2014, in response to Re: No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Train Dude on Sun Sep 7 10:33:58 2014. HOWARD BEACH.....NO RIOTS AND NO LOOTING....why training?BENSONHURST......NO RIOTS AND NO LOOTING.....WHY ASSCLOWN TRAIN DOUCHE? SEAN BELL ......NO RIOTS AND NO LOOTING.....WHY LOSER TRAIN DOUCHE? ABNER LOUIMA......NO RIOTS AND NO LOOTING......WHY SHITHEAD? WHY NOT CALL UP OLOG-HAI AND ASK THAT OLD TROLL RACIST WHY. I DARE YOU! PATRICK DORISMOND...........NO RIOTS AND NO LOOTING....WHY LOSER? EH? SHOULD YOU ASK DAVEY ABOUT THIS? EH? ANTHONY BAEZ........NO RIOTS AND NO LOOTING....WHY AGAIN......SHITHEAD? |
|
|
| (1225701) | |
BLACK AMERICAN ACTRESS HANDCUFFED FOR KISSING WHITE HUSBAND IN LA |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 12:47:07 2014, in response to No riots. No protests. No lootings., posted by Dave on Sun Sep 7 07:35:01 2014. I GUESS IN THE "LAND OF THE FREE," BLACK AMERICANS CAN NOT YET AGAIN COUNT ON FREEDOM FROM COPS AND THEIR RACIAL PROFILING.....WHY DAVE?FROM THE NYDAILNEWS.COM: Daniele Watts, black ‘Django Unchained’ actress, mistaken for prostitute, handcuffed and detained by police after kissing white husband The actress was humiliated for simply showing public affection to her husband after cops mistook her for a prostitute and she refused to show ID. ‘I remembered the countless times my father came home frustrated ... by cops when he had done nothing wrong,’ Watts wrote on Facebook. BY David Harding / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS / Sunday, September 14, 2014, 11:06 AM A black actress who appeared in “Django Unchained” was handcuffed and detained for kissing her white husband - because police allegedly assumed she was a prostitute. Writing on their Facebook pages, Watts and Lucas say they were approached by two officers and the actress was asked for ID. When Watts refused police handcuffed her before putting her in the back of a police car. She was released after her ID was checked by the officers. Watts wrote: "Today I was handcuffed… after refusing to agree that I had done something wrong by showing affection, fully clothed, in a public place. "As I was sitting in the back of the police car, I remembered the countless times my father came home frustrated or humiliated by cops when he had done nothing wrong. I felt his shame, his anger. Watts, who played CoCo in Quentin Tarantino's slavery film, said she was crying "for a country that calls itself 'the land of the free and the home of the brave' and yet detains people for claiming that very right'". The LAPD refused to comment on the incident. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/black-django-unchained-actress-detained-police-kissing-white-husband-article-1.1939111#ixzz3DJAEX6fW |
|
|
| (1225704) | |
Re: BLACK AMERICAN ACTRESS HANDCUFFED FOR KISSING WHITE HUSBAND IN LA |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Sep 14 12:54:44 2014, in response to BLACK AMERICAN ACTRESS HANDCUFFED FOR KISSING WHITE HUSBAND IN LA, posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 12:47:07 2014. Someone ought to explain to the cops that prostitutes don't kiss. :) |
|
|
| (1225710) | |
Re: BLACK AMERICAN ACTRESS HANDCUFFED FOR KISSING WHITE HUSBAND IN LA |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Sun Sep 14 13:08:35 2014, in response to Re: BLACK AMERICAN ACTRESS HANDCUFFED FOR KISSING WHITE HUSBAND IN LA, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Sep 14 12:54:44 2014. Seems strange that her White husband was not cuffed at all.....I mean......if they thought one way ......then her husband would then be the "john" looking for sex....right? |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 7 |
|