Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4]

 

Page 1 of 4

Next Page >  

(1215306)

view threaded

Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 13:19:21 2014

fiogf49gjkf0d
From the private autopsy requested by the parents of Micheal Brown, the so called eye witnesses were wrong. While he was shot at least 6 times, none of the shots were to the back . So much for eye witness testimony.




Post a New Response

(1215316)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 18 14:09:10 2014, in response to Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 13:19:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Also no indication of his hands being raised.

Post a New Response

(1215320)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by WayneJay on Mon Aug 18 14:12:46 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 18 14:09:10 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Throw in... Still no indication of a struggle.

Post a New Response

(1215321)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 14:14:06 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Aug 18 14:09:10 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The doctor who did the autopsy did not address that point.


Post a New Response

(1215322)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 14:19:07 2014, in response to Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 13:19:21 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nothing adds up at the moment. All shots from the front, so not shot in the back as claimed.

On the other hand, no gunpowder on the body, which suggests at least the fatal shots to the head were not at close range, which isn't really consistent with a fatal struggle for the gun.



Post a New Response

(1215327)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 18 14:24:12 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 14:14:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If his hands were in the air at the time he was shot, why would his arms have so many bullet wounds? Assuming the cop was aiming for the victim's torso, the fact that so many bullet wounds are in his arms seems to imply that his arms were down near this torso and not up in the air, right? Or am I way off base?

Post a New Response

(1215330)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 14:27:22 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 18 14:24:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
way off

Post a New Response

(1215333)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Aug 18 14:32:22 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 14:27:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Cops are taught to aim center mass. If his arms were up you would not see the pattern of wounds present based on police training

Post a New Response

(1215339)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 14:41:38 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 18 14:24:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your line of reasoning makes sense. All I said was the doctor didn't address the point.



Post a New Response

(1215344)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 14:51:27 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 14:19:07 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Which is why no conclusions should be drawn by either side

Post a New Response

(1215348)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 14:52:53 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Aug 18 14:24:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Another good point raised.

Post a New Response

(1215368)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Allan on Mon Aug 18 15:55:36 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 14:51:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
or by anyone here.

Post a New Response

(1215370)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by vfrt on Mon Aug 18 16:01:01 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Mon Aug 18 14:32:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Another hoodlum shot dead after committing a robbery. Yawn.

Post a New Response

(1215371)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 16:23:45 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by vfrt on Mon Aug 18 16:01:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Sorry, there is no death penalty for robbery. Yawn canceled.


Post a New Response

(1215372)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:34:38 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Allan on Mon Aug 18 15:55:36 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Here is not the real world and no one plays by real world rules.

Post a New Response

(1215373)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:37:07 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 16:23:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
First of all, there was no robbery according to reverend sharpton. It was simply shoplifting. However there is the possibility of use of deadly force when resisting lawful authority which I believe this case will boil down to.

Post a New Response

(1215374)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 16:37:48 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by vfrt on Mon Aug 18 16:01:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
go to hell

Post a New Response

(1215375)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 16:39:27 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:37:07 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
the death penality is not to be carred out by police / sheriffs on the streets this is supposed to be in a court of law determined

Post a New Response

(1215377)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:44:27 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 16:39:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You are confusing the death penalty with the necessary use of deadly force. Death penalty is imposed for conviction of a capital crime or crimes. The use of deadly force by a police officer is justified when it is used to protect the officer from injury or to prevent imminent injury of innocent civilians by a violent criminal.

Post a New Response

(1215378)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 16:50:46 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:37:07 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
However there is the possibility of use of deadly force when resisting lawful authority which I believe this case will boil down to.

I would also not be surprised if the officer was found to have acted in self-defense, but that was not vfrt's point of view. His point of view is that it does not matter if the officer behaved properly; the simple fact of the robbery justifies the officer.




Post a New Response

(1215379)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 16:57:41 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:44:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
i was saying no one has the right to inflict the DEATH PENALITY by means of lethal force especially on a unarmed person to the death
the courts are supposed to be the ones to determine the sentances of any defendant not a unjustified shooting of a innocent person

Post a New Response

(1215380)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:03:45 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:44:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Then he should have stopped when according to corroborated testimony, the victim put is hands up and said "I don't have a gun stop shooting"..(IIRC, Michael Brown was wounded then but probably would have survived from gunshot wounds to his arm) The next shot became excessive force, no?

Post a New Response

(1215381)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:05:12 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:34:38 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nor is the RW echo chamber. In fact, civilization mandates fighting the dystopia it seeks to enforce upon all.

Post a New Response

(1215382)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:05:14 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:03:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
no shots should have been fired period

Post a New Response

(1215383)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 17:08:32 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:03:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The next shot became excessive force, no?

Possibly, possibly not. There is far from enough evidence to tell for sure at this point. If the witness was provably wrong about Brown being shot in the back, his credibility concerning his hands being up suffers too.





Post a New Response

(1215385)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by FtGreeneG on Mon Aug 18 17:12:25 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 16:44:27 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Robbery or shoplifting if thats him in the video this dude belongs in jail not the morgue. But if he indeed attacked the cop first then I can't fault the officer doing what he did. Unless there's another witness to validate his friend's story bc his creditibilty is officially shot. I doubt the officer will face any charges. It's hard for me to believe anybody with any degree of sanity would really run at the officer like that unarmed from 35 ft away unless he way high or something. I think the truth is somewhere in the middle.

Post a New Response

(1215386)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by mtk52983 on Mon Aug 18 17:18:12 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:03:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
possibly, possibly not

Is the officer just supposed to take Brown's word that he did not have a gun? What is stop him from quickly taking out a concealed weapon and shoot when the officer has to lower his weapon to handcuff him?

Post a New Response

(1215387)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:20:49 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Mon Aug 18 17:18:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
what was the charge ? walking down the middle of the streets so you shoot someone who does this with their hands raised sky high ?
this is justified right ?

Post a New Response

(1215388)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 18 17:23:01 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by FtGreeneG on Mon Aug 18 17:12:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I read your posts.

Post a New Response

(1215389)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:23:38 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:05:14 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ideally, yes. But if any person, once in questioning from a cop runs away, they cop has the right to see the person in question be detained using the minimum amount of force necessary. That includes shooting, although any cop would dread the investigation that typically follows. So the sane ones do all they can to avoid that.

This time, it looks Ike Officer Wilson got trigger happy. Bear in mind all the evidence isn't in, we don't know about a shot supposedly fired in the car. I will say this, it's awfully suspicious how the Ferguson police are handłing this. Usually, honest police departments want to get all the information out ASAP. It removes any specter of wrongdoing on their part. Why are they being so secretive?

Post a New Response

(1215390)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:26:51 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 17:08:32 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There's several eyewitnesses that saw him with his hands up. Out of that many people, I'd say it's corroborated.

Post a New Response

(1215392)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:30:31 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:03:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah, that's the same witness testimony that said that he was shot in the back running away. When are you going to stop being such a simp and start thinking before flapping your gums.

Post a New Response

(1215393)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:31:35 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 16:50:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well I would disagree with that. I do not believe in summary execution or curbside justice.

Post a New Response

(1215394)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:32:49 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:05:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You are such an ignoramus. Is everything in your life right wing vs left wing?

Post a New Response

(1215395)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:34:01 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:23:38 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Oh and based on what evidence do you say that the officer got trigger happy?

Post a New Response

(1215397)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:36:59 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by FtGreeneG on Mon Aug 18 17:12:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You are correct that based on the video the perp belongs in jail but if he resisted lawful authority then he may have brought the more severe consequences upon himself.

Post a New Response

(1215398)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:38:03 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:26:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes you would. A reasonable person might do otherwise.

Post a New Response

(1215400)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:38:55 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 16:50:46 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
what self defense ? shooting a UNARMED person in the front or back is not self defense

Post a New Response

(1215401)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:40:47 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:30:31 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
no ...not running away standing with his hands up in the air

Post a New Response

(1215402)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:41:49 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:26:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
IAWTP

Post a New Response

(1215404)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 17:51:46 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:31:35 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Exactly.


Post a New Response

(1215410)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 18:11:29 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:30:31 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There are a number of witnesses that saw him with his hands up when he was shot. They had nothing to do with Mr Brown and his friend. Only reason to mention this is that is one of the few corroborated facts that have emerged. Can't deal with it, too bad.

Post a New Response

(1215411)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 18:14:00 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:32:49 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Like there's reality in the world of a RW hatful prick. Talk about ignorance......

Post a New Response

(1215421)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 19:12:33 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:34:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
"Looks like" is not a definitive statement. Read what I said.

Plus, numerous witnesses said his arms were up when the fatal shot was fired.

Post a New Response

(1215423)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 19:16:24 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 17:38:03 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Obviously that doesn't include ou.

Post a New Response

(1215427)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 20:07:41 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:26:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
hands up no weapon iawtp

Post a New Response

(1215428)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 20:12:21 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 19:12:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
numerous witnesses said his arms were up when the fatal shot was fired.
IAWTP

Post a New Response

(1215448)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:50:03 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 18:11:29 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
See, when you start talking in shorthand I know that even you don't believe the shit that you are spewing. The same witnesses saw him shot in the back. If they lied about that how can you trust them when they say that he had his hands up?

Post a New Response

(1215449)

view threaded

Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:53:19 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 18:14:00 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Like there's reality in the world of a RW hatful prick. Talk about ignorance......

Yeah, let's talk about ignorance. What is a "HATFUL PRICK"? Why are you such an ignorant cunt?


Post a New Response

(1215450)

view threaded

Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:54:33 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 19:12:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Hey, moron, if they were wrong about him getting shot in the back how can you believe them when they say he had his hands up?

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4]

 

Page 1 of 4

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]