|
|
| Is Nilet for real? (1174315) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (1174315) | |
Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:04:26 2014 he seems like a conservative caricature of what liberals think. |
|
|
| (1174316) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:04:45 2014, in response to Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:04:26 2014. In what way? |
|
|
| (1174317) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:05:28 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:04:45 2014. this post |
|
|
| (1174318) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:06:58 2014, in response to Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:04:26 2014. Good question. But since his "caricature" first popped up on Subchat, it seems to speak of sincerity at the very least. And it does fit with his past semi-frequent posts about being persecuted by train personnel. |
|
|
| (1174319) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:07:14 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:05:28 2014. I don't see the problem with it. Can you elaborate? |
|
|
| (1174320) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:07:47 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:05:28 2014. Now that's a genuine trainwreck of a post. |
|
|
| (1174327) | |
Re: Is Olog for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:11:57 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:06:58 2014. Good question. But since his "caricature" first popped up on Subchat, it seems to speak of sincerity at the very least.This from the person who can't actually define "conservative" or "liberal" and has openly advocated in favour of segregation. I doubt you actually believe any of the things you post, or you would have died of dehydration after assuming that water was a communist plot. And it does fit with his past semi-frequent posts about being persecuted by train personnel. That's a hoot! (a) I don't call it "persecution" when the MTA offers to fund my epic cross-country vacation. (b) What does the War On Photography have to do with anyone's political beliefs anyway? |
|
|
| (1174328) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:12:55 2014, in response to Re: Is Olog for real?, posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:11:57 2014. LOL! When you try to redefine conservative and liberal to suit yourself, you're the one with the problem.Your back is against the wall here, I think. |
|
|
| (1174329) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:13:18 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:07:14 2014. your expressed belief the poverty is the root of all problems. |
|
|
| (1174330) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:13:23 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:07:47 2014. I'd ask you to explain what's wrong with it, but you'd probably just shout the word "communism" seven times, "liberal" four times and "extremist" between two and six. |
|
|
| (1174331) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:14:12 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:12:55 2014. OK, back to basics.Define "liberal." Define "conservative." Or shut up. |
|
|
| (1174332) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:14:55 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:13:18 2014. No, I said poverty is the root of three problems. |
|
|
| (1174333) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:17:11 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:13:18 2014. Only way to solve that is to encourage gainful employment, if it really is. |
|
|
| (1174334) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:18:32 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:14:12 2014. LOL! That is not "basics". When you even ask that question, you're trying to redefine them rather than define them. And your redefinitions are so out there it's laughable. |
|
|
| (1174335) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:19:48 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 15 17:18:32 2014. I'm asking you to define the words you're using.Define "liberal." Define "conservative." Or shut up. |
|
|
| (1174338) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:31:28 2014, in response to Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:04:26 2014. to add some more examples,his belief in literally open boarders. and his speed in calling anyone who disagrees with him a racist |
|
|
| (1174346) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:48:38 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:31:28 2014. his belief in literally open boarders.Open borders. Not "boarders." Which is generally more of a libertarian idea than a liberal one. It's decidedly more consistent with laissez faire economics than most self-proclaimed free market advocates support. Classify it with any philosophy you like, the fact remains that nation-states with exclusive citizenship are an obsolete relic of our species' tribalistic past— a stepping stone between identifying only with the handful of people you know and being willing to abandon in-group/out-group distinctions entirely. Anyone who claims that we should close the border is implicitly stating that we need to keep out "them" for the benefit of "us" because "we" are inherently more valuable than "they" are. People should know better, especially if they've had access to education. Yes, we're naturally predisposed to divide humanity into "us" and "them" and to make the "us" as small as possible, but as I'm inclined to say in real life— I've managed to move beyond that, so what's wrong with you? and his speed in calling anyone who disagrees with him a racist So far, I've only called people racist who expressed racism— ChicagoMotorman, who claims the legitimacy of my argument is determined by the colour of my skin, GP38/R42 Chris, who said that racial equality was "nonsense," Olog who openly supports segregation, and anybody who claimed that a white man was justified in shooting a black kid simply because the kid was black. |
|
|
| (1174438) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 15 20:13:20 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:31:28 2014. Unfortunately he's a real person. Whether he actually believes his absurd extreme leftist lunacies is up for debate. I think he really does. |
|
|
| (1174439) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 15 20:14:28 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:48:38 2014. Lol....I said YOU were nonsense. |
|
|
| (1174814) | |
Re: Is Nilet Olog? |
|
|
Posted by DAnD124 on Thu Apr 17 00:41:52 2014, in response to Is Nilet for real?, posted by dand124 on Tue Apr 15 17:04:26 2014. earlier today olog stated that nilet is gone. how would he know this? nilet seems like an ologists caricature of what liberals think.or maybe both olog and nilet are fake and the same person is behind both of them. |
|
|
| (1174823) | |
Re: Is Nilet Olog? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 17 01:03:00 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet Olog?, posted by DAnD124 on Thu Apr 17 00:41:52 2014. According to EASY, who lives in Inglewood, Ca and has a body fat percentage of 15%, a photo of Nilet has been posted here and he's for real. The source of the photo might have been Terrapin Station's website. |
|
|
| (1174826) | |
Re: Is Nilet Olog? No |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 01:28:07 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet Olog?, posted by DAnD124 on Thu Apr 17 00:41:52 2014. Is dand124 Nilet? There's a sudden likeness of behavior between the two. (Although Nilet never stalked anyone.) |
|
|
| (1174834) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu Apr 17 01:34:03 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Nilet on Tue Apr 15 17:13:23 2014. You forgot "socialism", "left", and "leftist". :-) |
|
|
| (1174836) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 01:36:00 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by 3-9 on Thu Apr 17 01:34:03 2014. Those have special definitions for him. He does not use those terms lightly.Please tell me that you have at least read this. |
|
|
| (1174896) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 17 04:03:29 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 15 20:14:28 2014. Non-responsive.Try again. (Or I'll post the CAPTCHA.) |
|
|
| (1174897) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 17 04:04:14 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Tue Apr 15 20:13:20 2014. Link to which of my beliefs you consider "extreme leftist lunacy."Because despite your blabbering, you're remarkably short on specifics. |
|
|
| (1174914) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 17 04:37:30 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 01:36:00 2014. You're still linking that?OK, back to basics. Define "liberal." Define "conservative." Or stop linking that. |
|
|
| (1174935) | |
Re: Is Nilet for real? |
|
|
Posted by 3-9 on Thu Apr 17 08:06:13 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet for real?, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 01:36:00 2014. Oh, I've read it before. I don't necessarily agree with them, but I can see where he's coming from. |
|
|
| (1175038) | |
Re: Is Nilet Olog? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 17 12:17:13 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet Olog?, posted by DAnD124 on Thu Apr 17 00:41:52 2014. Could Nilet be SMAZZA? As one left, the other reappeared? |
|
|
| (1175051) | |
Re: Is Nilet Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 12:30:00 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet Olog?, posted by DAnD124 on Thu Apr 17 00:41:52 2014. 
|
|
|
| (1175060) | |
Re: Is Nilet Olog? |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 17 12:38:02 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet Olog?, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 17 12:17:13 2014. Who's SMAZZA? |
|
|
| (1175072) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 17 12:46:13 2014, in response to Re: Is Nilet Olog? The answer:, posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 12:30:00 2014. He only posts to defend him or to fight with streetcarman1. |
|
|
| (1175081) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 12:51:24 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 17 12:46:13 2014. Lie.Now go ask him about his religious beliefs. |
|
|
| (1175083) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no |
|
|
Posted by dand124 on Thu Apr 17 12:52:52 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 12:51:24 2014. if someone had two handles they could easily give each handle a different religious belief. |
|
|
| (1175088) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 12:56:08 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no, posted by dand124 on Thu Apr 17 12:52:52 2014. How many handles do you have, stalker? Your statement reveals more about you than about anyone else. |
|
|
| (1175096) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 13:02:16 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 17 12:46:13 2014. +1Your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1175099) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 13:06:35 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 13:02:16 2014. You backing up a lie as well, eh? Not unprecedented for you.Now go cower in fear from the Koch Brothers, those Schumer-funding "conservatives". |
|
|
| (1175108) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 13:12:23 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 13:06:35 2014. Ooohh I'm shakinYour Pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1175115) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 13:23:56 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 13:12:23 2014. I know. |
|
|
| (1175181) | |
Re: Is Spider-Pig a Dand124 clone? The answer: Hell YES! |
|
|
Posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 14:14:44 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Apr 17 12:46:13 2014. You both have one thing in common: you're both insane.You also seem to defend his insanity, as well. |
|
|
| (1175182) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 14:15:49 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 13:23:56 2014. PWNED. |
|
|
| (1175184) | |
Re: BIG Nikon Camera |
|
|
Posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 14:27:29 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 13:02:16 2014. Hey, watch it, Fred, or you'll be getting one of these for Halloween!
|
|
|
| (1175193) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 15:05:06 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 14:15:49 2014. LOL ok Ologyour pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1175199) | |
Re: This space left intentionally blank |
|
|
Posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 15:10:54 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 15:05:06 2014. A-hem. |
|
|
| (1175202) | |
Re: BIG Nikon Camera |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Apr 17 15:30:12 2014, in response to Re: BIG Nikon Camera, posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 14:27:29 2014. Haha! Nice.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1175221) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell YEAH! |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Thu Apr 17 16:23:37 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 12:56:08 2014. BEFORE CALLING SOMEONE ELSE A STALKER, LOOK AT YOURSELF IN THE MIRROR AND YOURSELF THAT QUESTION BEFORE ASKING THAT OF OTHERS! |
|
|
| (1175223) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Thu Apr 17 16:25:13 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: hell no, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 12:51:24 2014. "Now go ask him about his religious beliefs. "WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? |
|
|
| (1175225) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Thu Apr 17 16:26:17 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 13:06:35 2014. WHAT LIE? YOU BOTH ARE SO TRANSPARENT THAT IT IS SO OBVIOUS YOU ARE USING TWO HANDLES ON SUBCHAT. |
|
|
| (1175227) | |
Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer: |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Thu Apr 17 16:26:49 2014, in response to Re: Is mcorivervsaf Olog? The answer:, posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 14:15:49 2014. STFU...OLOG-HAI |
|
|
| (1175229) | |
Re: This space left intentionally blank |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Thu Apr 17 16:27:24 2014, in response to Re: This space left intentionally blank, posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Apr 17 15:10:54 2014. STFU..OLOG-HAI |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|