Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

First : << [21 22 23 24]

< Previous Page  

Page 24 of 24

 

(1172813)

view threaded

Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals

Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 10 18:22:53 2014, in response to Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Thu Apr 10 14:30:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Due to your bot-like behaviour, I'm going to need to verify that you're actually human before I continue.

Please type the text you see in this image:


Post a New Response

(1172902)

view threaded

Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals

Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 10 23:32:42 2014, in response to Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Apr 9 16:40:31 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your membership in the religion is defined by your acceptance of its beliefs.

Asking you why you belong to the religion is tantamount to asking you why you think its claims are true— except that it accounts for the possibility, however remote, that you might believe the religion is entirely false but attempt to fit in for unrelated reasons.

If I were to invite you out for a bacon cheeseburger on Saturday afternoon, you would almost certainly decline. Why is that?

Post a New Response

(1172913)

view threaded

Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals

Posted by LuchAAA on Fri Apr 11 01:19:45 2014, in response to Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals, posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 10 23:32:42 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Your membership in the religion is defined by your acceptance of its beliefs.

Asking you why you belong to the religion is tantamount to asking you why you think its claims are true— except that it accounts for the possibility, however remote, that you might believe the religion is entirely false but attempt to fit in for unrelated reasons.

If I were to invite you out for a bacon cheeseburger on Saturday afternoon, you would almost certainly decline. Why is that?


He appears to believe in Judaism. But one can be a agnostic Jewish or an agnostic Christian. It can be cultural. Ethnic. Something like that.

One time I was in Queens. I took the stairs because I want to keep my bf% in the 14-17% range. An immigrant Jewish neighbor said, "You are Jew"?

She thought I was observing Sabbath.

Post a New Response

(1172923)

view threaded

Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals

Posted by Nilet on Fri Apr 11 02:16:30 2014, in response to Re: I hope this low-income housing project fvcks with liberals, posted by LuchAAA on Fri Apr 11 01:19:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It can be cultural. Ethnic. Something like that.

Hence why I phrased my question to account for the possibility that he might subscribe to the religion for unrelated reasons.

It's hardly uncommon. I still celebrate holidays.

Post a New Response

(1174788)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Wed Apr 16 23:31:56 2014, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Oct 18 02:51:32 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
But you still have no one to blame but yourself. (If you're married and have to be tested for an STD.)



Post a New Response

(1174790)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by DAnD124 on Wed Apr 16 23:41:50 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by AlM on Wed Apr 16 23:31:56 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
there is new thread because this one has more than a thousand examples of ologist insanity

Post a New Response

(1174792)

view threaded

Re: STDs

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 16 23:48:31 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by AlM on Wed Apr 16 23:31:56 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Who is to blame if you catch an STD, eh?

Sounds like you're making a revelation about yourself now.

Post a New Response

(1174797)

view threaded

Re: STDs

Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 16 23:51:40 2014, in response to Re: STDs, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 16 23:48:31 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If you're a guy like me, single, and hook up and catch something because you didn't wear a rubber, it your own fault because you know the rules.

If you're married and you catch and STD there's really only one reason-someone was unfaithful. It's a painful betrayal. THIW.



Post a New Response

(1174799)

view threaded

Re: STDs

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 16 23:53:18 2014, in response to Re: STDs, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Apr 16 23:51:40 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes, someone was unfaithful. But unless you were both virgins before you got married, how do you know which one it was?

Post a New Response

(1174801)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 17 00:13:45 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by DAnD124 on Wed Apr 16 23:41:50 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I dunno ... wouldn't it perhaps be saner if we just put together a thread where Olog says something sane? THAT would be newsworthy. :)

Post a New Response

(1174803)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 17 00:16:22 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 17 00:13:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
But as you point out, the entertainment value is remarkable.



Post a New Response

(1174806)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 17 00:18:10 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 17 00:16:22 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Of course ... I'm just worried that we're going to get hit up soon to spring for a larger hard drive for Larry's box. :)

Post a New Response

(1174809)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Thu Apr 17 00:26:25 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 17 00:18:10 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Hey, it's only text. A mere terabyte of text would hold much of the collective verbal wisdom of the entire world.

Wikipedia is 18 billion words or only about 100 gigabytes, and as with Subchat much of it is expendable.


Post a New Response

(1174810)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 17 00:31:40 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by AlM on Thu Apr 17 00:26:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. It's the thought that matters. :)

Post a New Response

(1174831)

view threaded

Re: STDs

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Apr 17 01:31:58 2014, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu Apr 17 00:13:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Speak for yourself first.

Post a New Response

(1236912)

view threaded

Re: Libtardistan of Obsession

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 27 22:18:17 2014, in response to Re: Libtardistan of Obsession, posted by RockParkMan on Tue Jan 21 21:39:38 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Thanks for your approval of slavery, rocKKKparKKKnazi.

Post a New Response

(1252605)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by kew gardens teleport on Fri Jan 2 15:18:58 2015, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Oct 18 02:51:32 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
1108831

This one doesn't belong in Ology of Terror. It's far worse.

Post a New Response

(1252607)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 2 15:21:17 2015, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by kew gardens teleport on Fri Jan 2 15:18:58 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Why not?

Post a New Response

(1252608)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by AlM on Fri Jan 2 15:22:25 2015, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by kew gardens teleport on Fri Jan 2 15:18:58 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Why?



Post a New Response

(1252637)

view threaded

Re: Be S.A.F.E.

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jan 2 17:09:59 2015, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by kew gardens teleport on Fri Jan 2 15:18:58 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Worse? LOL!

First you criticize Nilet, then you become him. There is a context to what I posted here too.

You don't post frequently enough to be on the LOS (list of stalkers).

Post a New Response

(1252751)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by kew gardens teleport on Sat Jan 3 12:45:35 2015, in response to Re: Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Fri Jan 2 15:21:17 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Because he only posted an accurate report of what a boring German pseud said. Although the stopped clock cliché springs to mind, it's tragic that people still pay attention to someone who publishes nonsense wrapped in obfuscation, and worse still that, given the limited research funding available for the humanities and social sciences, money was pissed up the wall for years on work of no value whatsoever. At least Olog can console himself that it was largely German taxpayers' money that was wasted.

Post a New Response

(1278070)

view threaded

Re: Ology of Terror

Posted by dANd124 on Thu Apr 2 19:23:25 2015, in response to Ology of Terror, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Oct 21 17:08:34 2013.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ology of Terror III

Post a New Response

First : << [21 22 23 24]

< Previous Page  

Page 24 of 24

 

[ Return to the Message Index ]