Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought (1168835) | |
Home > OTChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
Page 10 of 13 |
(1180235) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:03:25 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 19:56:18 2014. |
|
(1180236) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:03:29 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 19:58:25 2014. tell your WHITE friends to stop hiring illegals over americans |
|
(1180237) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:04:04 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:03:25 2014. lol |
|
(1180238) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:04:31 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 19:57:26 2014. you refused to answer |
|
(1180239) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:05:17 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:02:24 2014. They won't listen to me. |
|
(1180240) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:05:59 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:04:04 2014. duh lol |
|
(1180241) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:06:15 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:00:05 2014. Raises reply to all caps. Uh-huh. ;) |
|
(1180242) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:06:30 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:04:31 2014. Answer what? |
|
(1180243) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:07:08 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 19:59:18 2014. Hey ... no problem. Now even the Philippines are getting our jobs. So yeah, shake that fist at Hispanics, that'll solve that too. |
|
(1180244) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:07:23 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:06:15 2014. Maybe it would perhaps get through your thick skull. |
|
(1180245) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:07:48 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:07:08 2014. ALL FOREIGNERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
(1180248) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:14:46 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:07:23 2014. Nope ... I have three of my employees right now in Odessa (I guess I'll need to tell you it's in Ukraine) who are under fire from Russkies right now because of you wrong wing asshole PNAC fuckers going in there and screwing up their country. You people are dangerous not only to America, but to the rest of the world. So no. |
|
(1180250) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:20:29 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:05:59 2014. lol |
|
(1180251) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:21:06 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:07:48 2014. So why are you people HIRING them instead of spending some money teaching Americans what a tapón is and how to install it instead? Go to a Home Depot sometime and see what language is in larger letters for finding parts there. The problem isn't foreigners, they're the only ones who are doing the work these days. The problem is cutting off our own noses and flushing ourselves down the baño. :( |
|
(1180252) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:22:07 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Sun May 4 20:06:30 2014. your friends are they hire ILLEGALS then underpay them and complain !why is this so ? explain |
|
(1180253) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:28:37 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:14:46 2014. So in other words you have hired foreigners over Americans. |
|
(1180254) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:29:37 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:21:06 2014. I am not an employer. |
|
(1180255) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:31:25 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:22:07 2014. I agree, both are at fault. Your only problem is with the white people. |
|
(1180256) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:32:57 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:28:37 2014. When you put in wanted ads on LinkedIn and other places, replies come from everywhere in the world. What we need people for is SO rare (kernel coders and device driver writers for BSD) that often we only get one or two offers from the entire planet. I've got a couple of people here, but most are in places where the kids actually learn such complex math. Here in the states, we're too busy teaching them bicycle safety and the bible. Neither of which teaches how to write code in Haskell.Blame the internet. FWIW though, only two Hispanics on payroll. |
|
(1180257) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:34:01 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:29:37 2014. I am ... we have a very excellent representation of folks from all over the earth in our operation. Why, we even have Israelis! :) |
|
(1180258) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:35:14 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:31:25 2014. Would it be OK if he calls you "paleface" instead? That's what one of my guys down in North Carolina calls me. :) |
|
(1180259) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:36:00 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:21:06 2014. I am not an employer. |
|
(1180260) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:37:17 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:35:14 2014. lol |
|
(1180261) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:37:43 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:32:57 2014. In other words you prefer to hire foreigners over Americans. |
|
(1180262) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:37:58 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun May 4 20:37:17 2014. He's cherokee, so it's all good. ;) |
|
(1180263) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:39:59 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:36:00 2014. Out in the burbs, if you want something done, you stop off at Homer's Despot and then as you exit the parking lot, pick up a six pack of Mexicans to install it for you because today, kids don't learn how to fix their own toilet or cut their own wood. See what I'm yammering abotu yet? If we'd only bother teaching our OWN people to be self-sufficient and fix their own shit, there wouldn't be jobs for those "illegals" "off the books" ...Or perhaps if folks in the burbs were willing to take that black guy to their house and let HIM fix it for them. But no. :( |
|
(1180264) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:40:08 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:34:01 2014. With unemploynent in mt country so high, you would rather hire foreigners instead of Americans. |
|
(1180265) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:17 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:39:59 2014. So you have hired illegals. |
|
(1180266) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:27 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:34:01 2014. With unemploynent in mt country so high, you would rather hire foreigners instead of Americans. |
|
(1180267) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:28 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:32:57 2014. In other words you prefer to hire foreigners over Americans. |
|
(1180268) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:29 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:21:06 2014. I am not an employer. |
|
(1180269) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:34 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:14:46 2014. So in other words you have hired foreigners over Americans. |
|
(1180270) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:42:57 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:37:43 2014. FIND me an American who can code kernel drivers in Haskell for BSD for manufacturers who made the hardware in China. So far, I've only found TWO in ten years who can actually do it. |
|
(1180272) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:48:46 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:42:57 2014. Let's make that problem even MORE fun. Here in the US, cryptography is illegal to teach until Obama made it OK. As a result of crypto being declared "munitions" there is nobody here yet who can do proper crypto code. We were the ONLY nation left that prohibited this. So I have three guys in Haifa and one who came over here from Spain that do that because they learned it in grade school and sharpened their skills at Uni.Perfect example of our lost brain trust is that whole "heartbleed" thing with TLS/SSL encryption. Bad code for nearly ten years now and nobody knew enough about it to spot the error in it until the Russkies did. Can't hire when there ain't talent here. |
|
(1180273) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun May 4 20:49:40 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:40:08 2014. Don't know many Americans capable of doing the job. That's another problem..... |
|
(1180274) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:49:44 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:42:57 2014. Your attention Salaam. |
|
(1180275) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:49:54 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:17 2014. Nope ... I fix my OWN stuff. But back to what you're swatting at. Would you hire a black guy off the street to pour cement for you? Or would you snap up a Mexican instead? Given your railing over black folks, it would seem that answer would be obvious. :( |
|
(1180276) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:50:41 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:40:08 2014. FIND me an American ... I always prefer our own but the work still has to get done. |
|
(1180277) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:51:01 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Sun May 4 20:49:40 2014. He should meet Dmitriy. :) |
|
(1180278) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:51:15 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:49:54 2014. An American black over a Mexican. |
|
(1180279) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:52:14 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:27 2014. Yep ... that's the problem ... this country is "mt" like you said of that kind of talent. About all we're teaching people to do here these days is how to ring up a burger sale by pressing the picture on the box that looks like a burger. :( |
|
(1180280) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:52:56 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:51:15 2014. Post pic when you do it ... this I gotta see. :) |
|
(1180281) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:53:28 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:29 2014. I *am* ... and I *really* want to see some Americans that can do the work. |
|
(1180283) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:54:14 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:42:34 2014. You're doing that broken record thing, bro ... FIND me an American that can write Haskell code for BSD drivers for undocumented devices. I'll gladly hire them. |
|
(1180284) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:54:36 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:50:41 2014. Find another profession. |
|
(1180285) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:56:52 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:49:44 2014. Here ya go, bro ... there's a bug in this particular driver. Find it. It's one of our coder tests. :)module Main where -- module System.USB.Hexwax --import Data.Time.Clock import Control.Concurrent (threadDelay) import Data.ByteString as B hiding (putStrLn, getLine) import Data.Char (intToDigit) import Data.Word (Word16) import Numeric (showIntAtBase) import System.Environment import System.IO import Hexwax as HW import Text.Printf main :: IO () main = do hw <- HW.attach case hw of Just dev -> do -- Print the FIRMWAREID response response <- HW.firmwareId dev -- Get the USB information printed out HW.printUsbDeviceInfo2 $ hwhDev dev -- set output unbuffered we we are using ANSI [-sequence hSetBuffering stdout NoBuffering -- -- read all bits from PORTB, from datasheet: 9C 02 00 FF -- -- 18Fx455 datasheetpage 116 EXAMPLE 10-2: INITIALIZING PORTB HW.setRegister dev regPORTB 0x00 -- clear output data latches HW.setRegister dev regADCON1 0x0E -- set RB<4:0> as digital I/I pins HW.setRegister dev regTRISB 0xFF -- set RB<7:0> as inputs -- -- INTCON2<7? clear to ENABLE PORTB internal pull-ups via LATB -- DEFAULT STATE: () 1111 -1-1 1111 0101 => F5 -- DESIRED STATE: 0111 -1-1 0111 0101 => E5 --HW.setRegister dev regINTCON2 0xE5 --HW.setRegister dev regLATB 0x00 -- LATB written as 0 ??!?!!? --HW.getRegister dev regTRISB >>= \x -> print x -- CMCON to 0x07 (Default value anyway!) --HW.setRegister dev 0xB4 0x07 printOutput return () where printOutput = do --HW.wait dev regPORTC 0x00 0xFF buf1 <- HW.getRegister dev regPORTB let val1 = (B.index (hwrBuf buf1) 2) --putStrLn $ "MSB " ++ (showIntAtBase 2 intToDigit val1 " LSB --PORTB") buf2 <- HW.getPort dev ioPORTB 0xFF printf "\ESC[sPORTB: %02X %02X\ESC[u" --printf "PORTB: GETREG: %02X\n" -- GETPORT: %02X\n" (B.index (hwrBuf buf1) 2) (B.index (hwrBuf buf2) 2) --threadDelay 1000000 printOutput Nothing -> putStrLn "HexWax device not found" {- -- simple LED test response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFE 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFD 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFB 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xF7 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFF 0x00 -- all bits off again putStrLn "*done*" -} {- -- set output unbuffered we we are using ANSI [-sequence hSetBuffering stdout NoBuffering -- read all bits from PORTB, from datasheet: 9C 02 00 FF -- Set portB as all inputs HW.setRegister dev regTRISB 0xFF HW.getRegister dev regTRISB >>= \x -> print x printOutput return () where printOutput = do HW.wait dev regPORTC 0x00 0xFF buf1 <- HW.getRegister dev regPORTB buf2 <- HW.getPort dev ioPORTB 0xFF printf "\ESC[sPORTB: %02X %02X\ESC[u" (B.index (hwrBuf buf1) 2) (B.index (hwrBuf buf2) 2) printOutput -} {- -- WAIT test... 4 * 250 is one second so we should be able to blink HW.setPortBit dev ioPORTA 0x00 0x00 HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.wait dev regPORTB 0x00 0xFA HW.setPortBit dev ioPORTA 0x00 0x01 -} {- response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFE 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFD 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFB 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xF7 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPort dev 0x01 0xFF 0x00 -- all bits off again response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x00 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x00 0x01 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x01 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x01 0x01 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x02 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x02 0x01 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x03 0x00 putStrLn "Press a key" >> getLine response <- HW.setPortBit dev 0x01 0x03 0x01 -- stepper motor pattern, one direction putStrLn "Press key, stepper motor pattern..." >> getLine -} {- hexwaxGo2 :: Device -> IO () hexwaxGo2 device = withDeviceHandle device attach where attach handle = withDetachedKernelDriver handle 0 claim claim = do let cmd = BS.replicate 4 '\0' withClaimedInterface handle ifNum (HW.writeCmd cmd ifNum handle) -} -- withDeviceHandle => withDetachedKernelDriver => withClaimedInterface => HW.writeCmd {- hexwaxGo :: Device -> IO () hexwaxGo device = do withDeviceHandle device attach where attach handle = do withDetachedKernelDriver handle 0 claim where claim = do let cmd = BS.replicate 4 '\0' withClaimedInterface handle ifNum (HW.writeCmd cmd ifNum handle) -} {- System.USB.Hexwax .open -- use default from datasheet .openAt productId vendorId .close .API. as HWA .setBit .getBit .setPort .getPort etc. .Util as HWU -- -- Bipolar stepper-motor driving -- .bpStepFwd .bpStepFwd N .bpStepRev .bpStepRev N -- -- Unipolar stepper-motor driving -- .upStepFwd .ubpStepFwd N .upStepRev .upStepRev N clever extensions: the ability to name an arbitrary group of outputs as a "pseudo-register" and then send a value to it. -} |
|
(1180287) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 21:00:09 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 20:54:36 2014. Heh. Nope. Our national security and that of our friends (particularly one you care about a lot) requires that I keep doing this. |
|
(1180288) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 21:01:54 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:56:52 2014. If I cannot find Americans to employ, and there are only foreigners available, I would find another profession. |
|
(1180289) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 21:03:23 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 21:00:09 2014. Benidict Arnold. |
|
(1180290) | |
Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought |
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Sun May 4 21:03:31 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun May 4 20:50:41 2014. Find another profession. |
|
Page 10 of 13 |