|
|
| Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything? (1161420) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 9 of 11 |
||
|
| (1197515) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything? |
|
|
Posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jun 28 01:19:57 2014, in response to Dennis Prager's "important thinking" of the week, posted by DAnD124 on Tue Mar 4 16:29:01 2014. http://www.dennisprager.com/dear-germany-have-you-learned-anything/I grew up, as many Americans and nearly all Jews did, with a deep anger at your country. But as a young man, I began to rethink my views of Germans. Against the wishes of almost everyone I knew — most of whom would not even buy a German product — I decided to go to Germany. My visit in 1968, at the age of 20, was the first of at least a dozen trips to your country. In fact, I became a defender of yours. I argued that it was wrong to hold any German who had been younger than 13 years old during the war morally responsible for your country’s horrific crimes. I chose the age of 13 because in Judaism, that is the age of moral culpability. I argued in 1968 that every German then under the age of 40 must be regarded as blameless, and we should not assume the worst of every German over 40. I argued that because Volkswagen and Mercedes defied the Arab boycott and did business with Israel, Jews should not boycott German products. I argued that you were our staunch ally in the Cold War in confronting Soviet Communism. I argued, most important of all, that Germans were ashamed of their Nazi past and had learned great moral lessons from it. The last argument, I now realize, was more hope than fact. There is no question that the vast majority of Germans are ashamed of Nazism and the Holocaust. But I am now as certain as I am sad that you learned nothing about good and evil from it, and that you are as confused morally today as you were when you supported Hitler. Not because you are evil, but because you cannot recognize evil. This is stunning. Unlike the Japanese, who have ignored their atrocities against the Chinese and Koreans, you confronted your evil. You taught the next generations of Germans about Nazism and about the Holocaust. It is therefore incredible that all that education about evil has produced a generation that shies away from judging, let alone confronting, evil. It boggles the mind that a nation that was liberated from Nazism solely by armies waging war should embrace pacifism, that a nation that saw what appeasement of evil leads to now embraces it. I was sure that some German leaders would stand up and say, “My fellow Germans, we know a Hitler when we see one, and Saddam Hussein is one.” But no German stood up to say this. Instead one of your leaders compared the American president to Hitler. I was sure that some German leaders would stand up and say, “My fellow Germans, we know genocidal anti-Semitism when we see it, and we see it in the Arab world.” But no German leader stood up to say this either. Few of us expected anything from the French. From the Jacobins and the guillotine, to the Dreyfus trial, to the Vichy regime, to de Gaulle’s withdrawal from anti-Communist NATO, France, with rare exceptions, has done little that is moral and nothing that is courageous. So the disdain that many Americans have long felt for France has merely been reinforced. But I think that I speak in the name of many Americans in saying that we expected more of you. Because of what we did for you after World War II and during the Cold War. Because you, of all people, know that Americans are a decent people. And especially because of your experience with evil. How could you have produced a Hitler and not recognize another one just one generation later? How could you know firsthand about torture chambers and children’s screams and not ache to end them in another country? How could you side with amoral France against your friend America? There is, it would seem, only one answer. Nazism taught you nothing. Instead of learning that evil must be fought, you learned that fighting is evil. But thanks for Bach. |
|
|
| (1197516) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jun 28 01:59:45 2014, in response to Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jun 28 01:08:46 2014. Hmmmm ... sounds like somebody lost the key to their closet ... so uptight. :) |
|
|
| (1197520) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Jun 28 06:59:36 2014, in response to Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything?, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jun 28 01:19:57 2014. |
|
|
| (1197533) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything? |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Jun 28 08:25:43 2014, in response to Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything?, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jun 28 01:19:57 2014. Ok, where's the thinking? |
|
|
| (1197536) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Jun 28 08:45:14 2014, in response to Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jun 28 01:08:46 2014. Once again, moar houghless babble. Busy week, eh? |
|
|
| (1197537) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 28 08:51:13 2014, in response to Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome, posted by bingbong on Sat Jun 28 08:45:14 2014. Happy Ramadan. |
|
|
| (1197538) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sat Jun 28 09:01:29 2014, in response to Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: What I learned at the Metrodome, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Jun 28 08:51:13 2014. Eh? I'm not Islamic. |
|
|
| (1197543) | |
Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything? |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Jun 28 09:49:25 2014, in response to Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' flashback: Dear Germany: Have you learned anything?, posted by DaNd124 on Sat Jun 28 01:19:57 2014. How could you have produced a Hitler and not recognize another one just one generation later?Hmm. How many logical flaws can you find in this sentence? |
|
|
| (1198097) | |
Re: Pope Francis: Pets Can't Replace Children Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jun 30 13:00:50 2014, in response to Re: Pope Francis: Pets Can't Replace Children Re: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by bingbong on Thu Jun 12 13:39:35 2014. bumpWhen have you ever been right when we disagreed with you? Name one single instance. Just one. |
|
|
| (1198805) | |
Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by DANd124 on Tue Jul 1 21:06:44 2014, in response to Dennis Prager's "important thinking" of the week, posted by DAnD124 on Tue Mar 4 16:29:01 2014. What would Prager think about the Oakland Kikes?http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2014/07/01/why-the-lefts-preoccupation-with-the-redskins-n1857558 Given how much evil there is in the world; given how many signs of moral, intellectual and economic decline there are here in America; and given the increasing irrelevance of America to world events, it is fair to ask why the American Left is preoccupied with the name Washington "Redskins." The Washington Redskins have been in existence for 82 years. For about 80 of those years, virtually no one, including the vast majority of American Indians, was troubled by the name. Yet, it is now of such importance to the American left that the majority leader of the United States Senate has repeatedly demanded, from the floor of the United States Senate, that the team drop its name; 50 United States senators, all of them Democrats, have signed an open letter demanding the same; Sports Illustrated's Peter King no longer uses the name; other leading sportswriters have adopted the same practice; and the president of the United States has weighed in on the issue. The pressure is relentless. There is more concern in the pages of the Washington Post and the New York Times -- not to mention the rest of the left -- with the Redskins than with Internal Revenue Service targeting conservative groups for investigation, one of its division heads pleading the Fifth Amendment before Congress, and the Agency's losing all relevant emails and hard drives. The angry will tell you that the name "Redskins" is profoundly offensive to American Indians and that they -- the angry -- are simply more sensitive to racial slurs than others. This explanation is self-serving, but insufficient. The great majority of American Indians understandably just don't care. Like heterosexual AIDS and so many other crises, this has been entirely manufactured by the left. Since 1947, there has been a movie theater, the Redskins Theatre (with the same logo as the football team), in Anadarko, Oklahoma, a city whose population is divided evenly between Indians and whites, and which calls itself the "Indian Capital of the Nation." Why, in 67 years, have the Indian populations of Anadarko and Oklahoma not changed this theater's name? Because the left hadn't made it an issue. It's not an Indian issue; it's a left-wing issue. And why is the left so preoccupied? It isn't because they are more morally sensitive to injustice. That is what the left believes about itself. But there are other reasons for the manufactured hysteria about the Redskins name. Here are some: First, there is a rule in life: Those who do not confront the greatest evils will confront much lesser evils or simply manufacture alleged evils that they then confront. This has been a dominant characteristic of the Left for at least half a century. The greatest evils since World War II have been Communism and, since the demise of Communism in the Soviet Union and most other Communist countries, violent Islam -- or, as it often called, Islamism. Islamism is the belief that Sharia (Islamic law) must be imposed wherever possible on a society, beginning, of course, with Muslim-majority countries. These Islamists are, as the British historian Andrew Roberts has noted, the fourth incarnation of fascism -- first there was fascism, then Nazism, then communism, and now Islamism. For many years, most of the Western left was supportive of communism, and after the 1960s, it was simply hostile to anti-communists. The left was far more concerned with attacking America than with attacking the Soviet Union. So, too, today, the left is far more concerned with attacking America -- its alleged racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia and economic inequality -- than with fighting Islamism. Second, the corollary to the above is that those who do not fight the greatest evils invariably loathe those who do. The left hated American anti-communists much more than it hated communists. The left today hates traditional America much more than it hates traditional Islamists. The Redskins name is a symbol of that hated America. Third, the left has huge nostalgia for the sixties. In the left's eyes, virtually every one of its causes is as morally urgent as the civil rights battles on behalf of blacks (for which it falsely claims exclusive credit). Therefore getting the Redskins to change their name is a contemporary expression of working to give blacks full voting rights. Fourth, aside from tearing down another American tradition, and showing how awful America was and remains, the motivating issue here is left-wing self-esteem. Remember it was the left that developed the self-esteem movement. And nobody feels as good about themselves as the left does when it finds another American moral flaw, especially when that flaw is another example of "intolerance," and racism. Fifth, and finally, the left is totalitarian at heart. Whenever possible, they seek control of others; and they love to throw their considerable weight around. The left-wing president does it so often that the Supreme Court has unanimously shot down his attempts on a dozen occasions. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, under huge pressure from leftists, just dropped conservative Pulitzer-Prize winning columnist George Will. Under pressure from left-wing professors and students, Brandeis and other universities dropped the few conservative speakers they had invited to this year's commencement exercises. Forcing the Redskins to do their will is just the left's latest attempt to force its views on the vast majority of its fellow citizens. That's why it's worth fighting for the Redskins. Today it's the Redskins,tomorrow it's you. |
|
|
| (1198831) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 1 21:42:14 2014, in response to Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by DANd124 on Tue Jul 1 21:06:44 2014. Let Preager waste his time on this. Beats paying attention. |
|
|
| (1198868) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 2 01:43:55 2014, in response to Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by DANd124 on Tue Jul 1 21:06:44 2014. You keep losing these posts. |
|
|
| (1198869) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 02:08:40 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 2 01:43:55 2014. I consider it a w1n myself ... saves me from giving him a page hit and still be able to chuckle at what people who obviously still smoke crack can conjure up in their twisted little minds. :)I mean ... I was alive for most of the period of time that he depends on to peddle his stuff and it just wasn't like that. But then Gen X and those who follow have no way of knowing that he's talking shit. |
|
|
| (1198872) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 2 03:36:51 2014, in response to Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by DANd124 on Tue Jul 1 21:06:44 2014. George Will got dumped because he said something really stupid about rape, like many other righties do. I think they watch too much porn and think rape is just another fetish.Anyway, Will didn't get dropped just because he's on the right. Your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1198875) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 04:09:43 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by Fred G on Wed Jul 2 03:36:51 2014. Maybe he should consult with Jimmy the Greek for some advice on that stuff. :) |
|
|
| (1198877) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 05:20:15 2014, in response to Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by DANd124 on Tue Jul 1 21:06:44 2014.  |
|
|
| (1198917) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jul 2 08:37:20 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 2 01:43:55 2014. FALSE! Without him, I never would have realized how much of a reäctionary Prager is. |
|
|
| (1198935) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 09:21:36 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 04:09:43 2014. 
|
|
|
| (1198936) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 09:25:02 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 02:08:40 2014. WTF, are you talking about? |
|
|
| (1198937) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 09:27:25 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 05:20:15 2014. 8. People that hate the United States of America. |
|
|
| (1198938) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 09:34:06 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 09:27:25 2014. You mean the elephants in the cartoon. |
|
|
| (1198942) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Jul 2 09:38:52 2014, in response to Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by DANd124 on Tue Jul 1 21:06:44 2014. Yep, the left is so much in control of the nation's agenda that taxes are way higher than they were under President Bush. |
|
|
| (1198946) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 09:43:09 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 09:34:06 2014. No. Jackasses like you. |
|
|
| (1198952) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jul 2 10:16:54 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Jul 2 01:43:55 2014. heh. Every post he necromakes to this thread is a l0ss. Poor dand is just a bit too self-absorbed and self-righteous. |
|
|
| (1198960) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 10:40:23 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 09:43:09 2014. LOL! Hater. Can't handle being called on it, eh? |
|
|
| (1198966) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 10:54:04 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 10:40:23 2014. You will always be older than me. |
|
|
| (1198969) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 10:54:54 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 10:54:04 2014. I will always be wiser than you. |
|
|
| (1198980) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 11:00:09 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 10:54:54 2014. Again, that makes me wiser than the younger generation. |
|
|
| (1198988) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 11:30:21 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 11:00:09 2014. Despite our not being. |
|
|
| (1198997) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 12:17:15 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 11:30:21 2014. ? |
|
|
| (1199244) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 18:21:35 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 09:21:36 2014. 
|
|
|
| (1199265) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Jul 2 19:10:39 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 18:21:35 2014. "Sorry, you cannot link to an image on OpEdNews." Please try again so we all can see it!!! |
|
|
| (1199266) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 19:10:42 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 18:21:35 2014. It didn't open. But whatever it was, its as usual something I don't agree with. |
|
|
| (1199276) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 19:20:28 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 19:10:42 2014. Yep ...
|
|
|
| (1199282) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 19:38:06 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 19:20:28 2014. Now I know you hate this country. |
|
|
| (1199287) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 19:54:57 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 19:38:06 2014. Yeah, that's gotta be it. That I refuse to allow your type to trash this nation and restrict the rights of all Americans. Yep ... that's gotta be it. You're a divider. That's unAmerican. |
|
|
| (1199291) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 20:07:57 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 19:54:57 2014. Say it. I LOVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. |
|
|
| (1199292) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 20:10:56 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 20:07:57 2014. Loyalty oaths are an anathema to America.And if YOUR side actually gave a shit, then THIS wouldn't be happening. Read it. http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/140701/united-states-among-worsening-nations-why This is the America you guys have been making ever since Reagan and now it's showing. :( |
|
|
| (1199294) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Jul 2 20:16:10 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 20:10:56 2014. And you want to bring more foreigners here. |
|
|
| (1199296) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 20:18:58 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Jul 2 20:16:10 2014. Where did I ever say that? But what we ARE doing is reducing wages, cutting pensions, cutting off our noses to spite our faces to give tax cuts to people who take that money and offshore it.Sorry bro ... I want a BETTER America, not your fascist dystopia. |
|
|
| (1199297) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Jul 2 20:21:32 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 20:10:56 2014. And you want to bring more foreigners here. |
|
|
| (1199302) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 20:24:27 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Jul 2 20:07:57 2014. This is an internet forum. You can't hear what anyone is saying. |
|
|
| (1199310) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Jul 2 21:55:21 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by bingbong on Tue Jul 1 21:42:14 2014. Just as letting the left waste their time on it.... |
|
|
| (1199312) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 22:01:51 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Jul 2 21:55:21 2014. Protip: they're not. |
|
|
| (1199314) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Jul 2 22:02:54 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 22:01:51 2014. Well they sure are making a big deal out of it......even Nancy pelosi....seems to think this is a pressing issue for the country. |
|
|
| (1199315) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Jul 2 22:04:54 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 20:18:58 2014. iawtp ! |
|
|
| (1199328) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Wed Jul 2 22:30:33 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Jul 2 22:02:54 2014. You're watching old news. |
|
|
| (1199351) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by jimmymc25 on Wed Jul 2 22:46:07 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 20:18:58 2014. Makes me wonder if they even know what America is about anymore.Jimmymc25 |
|
|
| (1199358) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 23:05:42 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by jimmymc25 on Wed Jul 2 22:46:07 2014. It appears as though their model is a cross between the Taliban and Somalia. As though they watched WAY too much Star Trek and believe that the Ferenghi are the godhead. :(Sadder still is that even the EU is figuring out that this shit ain't working, but it's "ramming speed" still over here. |
|
|
| (1199405) | |
Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week |
|
|
Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Thu Jul 3 01:22:22 2014, in response to Re: Why the Left's Preoccupation with the Redskins?: Dennis Prager's ''important thinking'' of the week, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Jul 2 20:10:56 2014. Name me a better country. And are you going to wave the flag on the 4th? |
|
|
|
Page 9 of 11 |
||