|
|
| Re: Wrong (Re: Why the ''unintended conseqences'' of Sharia Law bans should be welcome) (942125) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Wrong (Re: Why the ''unintended conseqences'' of Sharia Law bans should be welcome) |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed May 16 14:11:33 2012, in response to Re: Wrong (Re: Why the ''unintended conseqences'' of Sharia Law bans should be welcome), posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 14:03:32 2012. I would think that would be an unconstitutional interference with private contracts. You think I should be allowed to cross the street while texting but you don't think I should be able to specify a rabbinical court as an arbitrator in a private contract? That's an odd notion of liberty.Where would you draw the line? If I can't specify a rabbinical court, presumably I can't specify a Roman Catholic tribunal either. How about an individual rabbi or priest? How about Mr. John Smith who lives down the street? How about arbitration rules as specified in your brokerage contract? ow about an individual selected on application to the American Arbitration Association? |
|
|
|