|
|
| Re: Violent (leftist) Arizona Protests (600313) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Violent (leftist) Arizona Protests |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Apr 27 19:19:39 2010, in response to Re: Rifles vs. Bows and Arrows, posted by streetcarman1 on Tue Apr 27 17:31:22 2010. after playing with your toys in the corner?Since you come up with stuff like that, I must presume that that's all you know in your life. Maybe someday you'll grow up. If you ever look at the history books...which I can only guess that maybe you do....a loaded rifle can do more damage than a lame ass bow and arrow You don't know history very well, do you? or the history of weapons for that matter, since rifles didn't become particularly deadly in military use until breech-loading, which didn't stow up until the 19th Century—before that, muzzle loading left you very vulnerable to hails of those "lame-ass bows and arrows". Shaka, the leader of the Zulu Empire, almost flattened the British military with "lame-ass bows and arrows" as well as other primitive weapons such as the short spear. And if you had bothered to read history books yourself, you would have been aware of Native Americans procuring modern weaponry via various sources, and still not being able to win. The settlers came here with LOADED rifles and not bows and arrows OK, you want to give us double proof of your utter ignorance. I already went over breech loading versus muzzle loading; don't make me go into the problems with black powder. Even worse, you didn't bother to look on the web for the answers . . . |
|
|
|