|
|
| Re: It's official: Global warming is dead and ''anthropogenic'' same never existed (509829) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: It's official: Global warming is dead and ''anthropogenic'' same never existed |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Oct 12 23:36:43 2009, in response to Re: It's official: Global warming is dead and ''anthropogenic'' same never existed, posted by WillD on Mon Oct 12 22:53:03 2009. You have demonstrated zero familiarity with what is and what is not a greenhouse gas or their effectsRather, you have. Furthermore, you have zero familiarity with the lack of scientific credibility of the IPCC. Venus, with less surface solar radiation than is found in Earth orbit, has a temperature far higher at the surface than Mercury experiences because of its carbon dioxide atmosphere We have indeed been over this. Venus is 0.815 times the mass of Earth whereas Mercury is 0.055 times the mass of Earth. Not only a lot more surface area, but a lot more mass too. Sweet F.A. to do with CO2 in the atmosphere. Now are you going to compare apples to oranges for your next trick . . . ? Methane, carbon dioxide, sulfur hexaflouride, and many other possible industrial emissions all emit infrared radiation when they absorb visible light, and all are produced on an annual basis in quantities far larger than natural emissions from intermittant cataclysmic events. That's an assumption, not a scientific fact. The only honest word there is "possible", which still allows for "impossible". The IPCC's BS "global warming potential" is thoroughly unscientific (based on CO2 when that gas' greenhouse effect isn't even established). Try studying science for once and you might get a sense of their dishonesty. Water vapor consists of over 95 percent of the so-called "greenhouse effect" that doesn't exist (using IPCC sophistry). (SF6?? Concentration in the atmosphere is so low, it's almost undetectable.) And the earth is still cooling . . . |
|
|
|