|
|
| Re: It's official: Global warming is dead and ''anthropogenic'' same never existed (509917) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: It's official: Global warming is dead and ''anthropogenic'' same never existed |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Oct 13 02:30:55 2009, in response to Re: It's official: Global warming is dead and ''anthropogenic'' same never existed, posted by WillD on Tue Oct 13 01:51:32 2009. I've attempted to educate you because you appear to be utterly scientifically illiterate and you've remained stubbornly ignorant. Physics aren't partisan, they're not political. You can't rewrite the laws of thermodynamics in a committee, and because of this your patently nonscientific objections are completely and utterly baselessproof? You're reacting in a very political manner. No scientist would talk like that. Politicians would, though. Unscientific by what standard? The (IPCC's?) results are based on theory tested through experimentation Did you read the BBC article? The IPCC doesn't produce "results". They publish propaganda. The greenhouse effect is very much real, it's why we exist in the first place . . . thanks to water vapor. (Two-thirds of the earth's surface, remember.) It's the global warming doubters who are always complaining about the short term of the 150 year instrument record. As such crowing over a trend based on less than 10 years of data is completely hypocritical Why so, if the data doesn't prove the "consensus" and violates the scientific method at the same time? The earth continues to cool . . . |
|
|
|