|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400323) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by Charles G on Tue Jan 6 09:16:19 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Stephen Bauman on Tue Jan 6 00:30:06 2009. Apparently in Minnesota the issue is somewhat different in that they people operating the polls are supposed to make a copy of any ballot that is "damaged" and then mark it "DUPLICATE". The thinking is that many of the poll workers didn't stamp things as "DUPLICATE" so that when it came time to do the recount they couldn't tell which were the duplicates and which were the originals. So they counted both. |
|
|
|