Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400365) | |||
Home > OTChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
Posted by Stephen Bauman on Tue Jan 6 13:59:11 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Charles G on Tue Jan 6 11:25:59 2009. I'd assume "damaged" is a euphemism for being misread by the mark sense equipment. That could mean anything from a coffee stain to the ballot being shredded by the mark sense reader. |
(There are no responses to this message.)