|
|
| Re: 2nd Amendment? Re: No Thugs at Scene of Biker Gang 'Rumble' (1290312) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: 2nd Amendment? Re: No Thugs at Scene of Biker Gang 'Rumble' |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sat May 23 13:55:24 2015, in response to Re: 2nd Amendment? Re: No Thugs at Scene of Biker Gang 'Rumble', posted by Dave on Sat May 23 07:24:11 2015. That's still Connecticut, the state where one of those weapons was legally purchased, legally owned, and used to commit a mass murder at a school. So what gives?In any case, you need a nationwide ban, so posting a Connecticut ban isn't much use— remember, even stolen guns count as "legal" guns when determining how criminals managed to gain access to them, and states aren't allowed to enforce border control with their neighbors. Or to reiterate my earlier point in more detail— you can't give me an example of a single gun crime that was not committed with a gun that was (a) purchased legally, (b) purchased by someone who was individually banned (eg, a felon) in a location where such purchases are legal by default, (c) stolen from a legal owner, or (d) originally introduced to the black market by means of any of the above. |
|
|
|