|
|
| Re: 2 COPS SHOT (1249414) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: 2 COPS SHOT |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sun Dec 21 21:09:52 2014, in response to Re: 2 COPS SHOT, posted by The Silence on Sun Dec 21 13:09:18 2014. Communications are not always subject to warrants.All communications are monitored. The feds can legally open any email that is over 180 days old without a warrant. Under a law that predates the internet, which is blatantly unconstitutional. You need to learn the difference between a protest and a riot. If you think the police never crack down on peaceful protests, then you clearly need to learn the difference. they don't have nerve gas. tear gas is not nerve gas. Nerve gas is potentially lethal. Tear Gas isn't. (a) Whether it's technically nerve gas or not, tear gas is potentially lethal. (b) In any case, its use in war is banned because it's a chemical weapon. Are you saying that chemical weapons considered too egregious to use against enemy soldiers on a battlefield should be used against peaceful civilians? I posted a retarded picture because I don't know anything about police militarization. So you think that cops should have tanks and automatic weapons? Why not just use the military for law enforcement? By all accounts, the Ferguson police department is an occupying army and the United States would be well advised to liberate the town from the insurgents who have captured it. You can't send someone to prison without a conviction, let along charges. So you've completely forgotten that Guantanamo Bay still exists? I'd ask you to provide examples of torture and killing, but I know you would just swing back to Brown... Seriously? Since it's obvious you haven't so much glanced at a newspaper in the last 10 years or so, I'm not sure why you think you're qualified to spout off like this. |
|
|
|