|
|
| Re: Why We Need a Moratorium on Future SBS Routes (303232) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Why We Need a Moratorium on Future SBS Routes |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Wed Mar 4 10:32:57 2015, in response to Re: Why We Need a Moratorium on Future SBS Routes, posted by Stephen Bauman on Wed Mar 4 10:22:50 2015. Doesn't through service eliminate layovers, thus lessening congestion?For your LIRR shuttle solution, it is a good one, but it would have to be free, wouldn't it? I wonder if simply having Flushing-bound buses end at different spots within a 1/4 to 1/2 mile radius of Main / Roosevelt and then having circulator buses connect the dots would be a little cheaper. I proposed something like that for Jamaica to connect 165th St terminal with Parsons / Archer with the LIRR at Sutphin, and having no other buses run through Jamaica (i.e. buses from the west would end at Sutphin, buses from the east would end at 165, and buses from the south would end at 168th / Archer, or something like that). |
|
|
|