Home · Maps · About

Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: What is wrong with Select Bus Service

Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Sat Jul 9 05:43:30 2011, in response to Re: What is wrong with Select Bus Service, posted by checkmatechamp13 on Sat Jul 9 00:20:30 2011.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
By comparison, the average local route had a weekday farebox recovery ratio of 79.2% for NYCT and 81.5% for MTA Bus.

The really shocking bit was that these routes were losing money:
B1
B3
B6
B8
B9
B11
B17
B25
B36
B41
B42
B44
B46
B49
B54
B64
B68
B70
B77
B82
B83
B103
Bx1/2
Bx5
Bx7
Bx11
Bx13
Bx15
Bx17
Bx21
Bx22
Bx27
Bx31
Bx36
Bx41
M15
M31
M42
M57
M60
M72
M100
M101
M102
M103
Q6
Q9
Q10

Q13
Q18
Q25/Q34
Q29
Q37
Q40
Q47
Q49

Q55
Q56
Q58
Q65
Q66
Q104
Q112

These routes — often high-ridership ones — should all have been making a small profit. If they had, the local buses system-wide would not have been losing money. They were the financial black hole, however fun it was to laugh at the S60 and the Q79.

The express beese and the railroads are a different problem. With the local buses, it was clearly a case for a fare hike (and generally not service cuts); this isn't true for systems with high fares and nowhere near 100% farebox recovery.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]