|
|
| Re: MTA service cut proposals by borough---Brooklyn (183141) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: MTA service cut proposals by borough---Brooklyn |
|
|
Posted by B49 Limited on Sat Jan 23 03:28:45 2010, in response to Re: MTA service cut proposals by borough---Brooklyn, posted by GOLD_12th on Sat Jan 23 02:53:51 2010. I agree... MTA really need to think it out.I am just thinking out loud but here is my reaction to this crap. B 61/ 77 saw that coming when the B 61 was split. B 57 assuming the B 37 route to 9 Street, why the B 57? I don't see the logic in that one. B 67/ 69 proposal.. WTF! 1) B 69 making a left on 7 Av/ Flatbush good luck on that one. 2) Why do we need the B 69 to serve Navy Yard? 3) With this alternating of buses, would that mean more of cut service on the B 67 or more buses (waiting time for the B 67 now vs this new proposal)? There are better ideas for the B 69 (rush hour service to/from Myrtle Av/Vanderbilt) MTA in regards to B 71 listen to me combine B 14 or restructure the route... IT is still vital. Terminating the B 4 at CI Av and Av Z... Are you kidding me!! The bus is vital to Sheepshed Bay. Good luck B 36 riders... B1/64 - B 86 this is a proposal been around since the 90s cutbacks.. I am split about it B70 proposal/eliminate B 8 to Bay Ridge... Was the idea to send the B 8 to Bay ridge was to make easier connections with the SI buses? Also tell the B 70 customers that their ride will take longer and you will have to walk longer distance since it now serves 3 Av instead 7 Av B3 - Bergen Bch - Av X portion. Could have they at least proposed a rush hour segment only. That is what it really needs. B 12 - bad mistake. reduce hours of service to City line but don't cut it. And they proposed B 14 as alternative OMG. Could have use the Q 112 or the Q 7 as an alternative B 13- well not going into that one. B 48 - I saw that coming . The B 48 needs to studied it is still a vital route but when it reaches to Williamsburg the route becomes so outdated. You will see this route become a full 20 - 30 min bus very soon. Sorry to say this but I rather have the B 49 absorb this route north of Fulton. especially when the B 44 SBS comes in to play. B 64 - The restructured B 64 might as well combine the route with the B 3.. just a thought. Again bad move. Q 24 - understand B2 - Just combine with the B 100 already B 23 - either send the B 67 or the proposed B 69 to serve 16 Av. And also reorganized the B 103 bus stops on Cortelyou. CI AV (NB)/ Stratford Rd (SB), Marlborough and E 16 sts, and Ocean Av should be the stops on the B 103. They can also reroute the B 103 west of CI AV to stop at Ocean Pky/Cortelyou. then onto McDonald Av to stop at Church Av, eliminate the Albemarle Rd stop, and NB service continues on 11 Av onto the Prospect Expy. B 39 - mention here already send it to union sq. Someone please tell me how can I be in charge in operations planning. What b***$*** degree do I need to get to smack some idiots over there in the MTA LOL |
|
|
|