|
|
| Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! (32971) | |
 |
|
| Home > The Reef | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 14 of 14 |
||
|
| (33621) | |
Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 24 03:22:21 2008, in response to Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 01:37:43 2008. Are we supposed to take his word for that - or yours? Post the proof here if you have any. Otherwise your empty statements are just more of your mastabatory fantasy. |
|
| (33622) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:23:56 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 01:46:55 2008. You shouldn't agree, because they are wrong. |
|
| (33623) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:25:09 2008, in response to Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 24 03:22:21 2008. Shouldn't you be asking Nilet to post PROFF since he's the one whose incidents you're questioning, Inspector Kreisler? |
|
| (33624) | |
Re: MTA Contradictory Communication! (PLEASE READ; NYCLU Needs Your Help!) |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:26:47 2008, in response to Re: MTA Contradictory Communication! (PLEASE READ; NYCLU Needs Your Help!), posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat Feb 23 22:01:58 2008. It's not that simple. You should still use common sense. And if the police want to take you down, they will take you down no matter what. So it is still all at your own risk. |
|
| (33625) | |
DID COP READ THE MEMO Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:27:46 2008, in response to ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Nilet on Wed Feb 20 20:45:31 2008. Before he got grabby-grabby with the camcorder, did the apprehending cop READ THE MNRR MEMO/LETTER (which I hope Nilet had)??? What did they say about the supposed "Memorandum" where it "supposedly" says Photography Permitted... |
|
| (33626) | |
Re: REEFED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:29:21 2008, in response to Re: REEFED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Feb 22 16:49:41 2008. so... let's strip down to a g-string and dance like its 1999. |
|
| (33627) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 24 03:38:21 2008, in response to Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:25:09 2008. Hey, dickface, it was terrorpin who claimed that there was a CCRB decision - and furthermore, if I ever want your opinion, I'll give it to you. |
|
| (33628) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:38:43 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 01:49:12 2008. What does this have to do with the NYPD, Grand Concourse??? |
|
| (33629) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:43:16 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Osmosis Jones on Sun Feb 24 01:36:57 2008. Dude, I didn't bring it up. Bee Flexible #823 did. He posted the incorrect info. He shouted. He preached. He was totally wrong. And he can end it. |
|
| (33630) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 24 03:50:43 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:43:16 2008. He did end it in your 9 pic thread, so you guys shake hands and quit fighting.your pal, Fred |
|
| (33631) | |
Re: NILET LIES TO US AND SCREWS UP? |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:51:45 2008, in response to Re: NILET LIES TO US AND SCREWS UP?, posted by RonInBayside on Thu Feb 21 16:32:17 2008. can u write a prescription??.. |
|
| (33632) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:53:35 2008, in response to Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 24 03:38:21 2008. you must have missed the post where Nilet said the CCRB had written a letter of resolution and he even summarized it here.... |
|
| (33633) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:58:19 2008, in response to Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:53:35 2008. Here's that link... provided by your friend, teh Google |
|
| (33634) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 04:01:30 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:38:43 2008. So the GCT-MTA police or whomever stopped him this time.... |
|
| (33635) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 04:02:21 2008, in response to Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:58:19 2008. you rule. you put Train Dick in his place. |
|
| (33636) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 04:05:35 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:13:23 2008. Because you are the one advocating your rights to take pics. I don't want to be bothered by such a confrontation as it would be a waste of time. |
|
| (33637) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 04:06:13 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 04:01:30 2008. Presumably the MTA Police. Which is a different police force than the one that stopped him last time. So your point is invalid. |
|
| (33638) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 04:06:34 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 04:05:35 2008. No, you are incorrect. |
|
| (33639) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 04:07:42 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 04:06:13 2008. Fine, so there's a difference.. they still would most likely share info b/w each other anyway. |
|
| (33640) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 04:09:27 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Grand concourse on Sun Feb 24 04:07:42 2008. do you realize how ridiculous what you are saying sounds? |
|
| (33641) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 04:14:53 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 04:09:27 2008. the only "info" the two PD groups likely share is which donut flavor is best for all-nighters... |
|
| (33642) | |
Re: REEFED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 04:20:49 2008, in response to Re: REEFED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri Feb 22 14:23:28 2008. maybe it's teh friggid temps?? |
|
| (33643) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 24 05:59:39 2008, in response to Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 04:02:21 2008. Is that an unprovoked attack, whinecunt? |
|
| (33644) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 24 06:00:34 2008, in response to Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by South Ferry on Sun Feb 24 03:58:19 2008. That's not proof - that's cah-cah. Let him post the letter. |
|
| (33645) | |
Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sun Feb 24 06:20:40 2008, in response to Re: Where's the proof? Re: NOT ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Train Dude on Sun Feb 24 06:00:34 2008. I would like to see the actual letter myself.your pal, Fred |
|
| (33646) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sun Feb 24 08:08:33 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:38:43 2008. Pendatic Pikcerings You know damn weel what he mens TROLL |
|
| (33647) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sun Feb 24 08:10:12 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:23:56 2008. "You shouldn't agree, because they are wrong. In yoOR OPION ONLY |
|
| (33648) | |
Re: REEFED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sun Feb 24 08:12:08 2008, in response to Re: REEFED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by BrooklynBus on Sat Feb 23 20:09:04 2008. The nerver ending story |
|
| (33649) | |
Re: Reefed BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Sun Feb 24 08:13:27 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Feb 24 03:19:25 2008. |
|
| (33650) | |
Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN! |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Feb 24 08:38:48 2008, in response to Re: ROBBED BY A COP— AGAIN!, posted by BMTLines on Fri Feb 22 18:12:01 2008. 1050.9 doesn't apply to Grand Central Terminal. There may be something else that does apply to GC, but 1050.9 is not one of them. |
|
|
Page 14 of 14 |
||