|
|
| Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! (29570) | |
 |
|
| Home > The Reef | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
| (29570) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Aug 8 18:09:40 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. Did Larry ban him? Is so, about time! |
|
| (29571) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by LA Blue Line on Wed Aug 8 18:17:42 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. Didn't you post something like this a year or two ago and it turned out that he wasn't banned? |
|
| (29572) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 18:23:43 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by LA Blue Line on Wed Aug 8 18:17:42 2007. May have but I never got an e-mail before this time. I'm not sorry, the mere presence of SUBWAYSURF, Train Dude or Mr.Mabstoa in a thread would send Salaam for the blowtorch.He's even flamed me. I just consider the source. |
|
| (29573) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 18:26:31 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Aug 8 18:09:40 2007. I don't know, haven't been on SubChat yet. I did check the past 3 days of OTChat for any of his posts, but nothing.To quote Rhett Butler, "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn!". |
|
| (29574) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by metropod on Wed Aug 8 18:39:36 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. Ding dong the witch is gone! Which old witch? Salaam the witch! ding dong the wicked witch is gone!PARTY PARTY PARTY!!! WWWOOOHHHOOO |
|
| (29575) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Aug 8 18:44:20 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by metropod on Wed Aug 8 18:39:36 2007. Party ova hea, whoo whoo!!! |
|
| (29576) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Aug 8 18:53:08 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. I'm sure someone else from LA with a camera can replace the pics. |
|
| (29577) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 8 19:19:26 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. Sorry to hear it, but it's not like there haven't been many, many warnings and bits of advice ... :( |
|
| (29578) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by 9 local on Wed Aug 8 19:27:02 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Wed Aug 8 18:53:08 2007. that won't be hard, since there are quite a few other people from LA who post here. at least you won't be seeing "(C) SALAAM ALLAH" in huge block letters in the MIDDLE OF THE PHOTO. |
|
| (29579) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:51:29 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. After this weekends massacre I guess someone had to pay.Best to leave dead bodies be and not have another war. |
|
| (29580) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Wed Aug 8 19:57:47 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by 9 local on Wed Aug 8 19:27:02 2007. at least you won't be seeing "(C) SALAAM ALLAH" in huge block letters in the MIDDLE OF THE PHOTO.Kinda made one sympathize with the morons who condemn photos for bad motive... |
|
| (29581) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 19:57:59 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Aug 8 19:19:26 2007. Which, of course, he paid ZERO attention to the warnings and bits of advice.What really got me was that the typing in the e-mail was exactly like his many, many many, posts. The e-mail text only appears here, I trashed the original as it was in the spam folder. Salaam's not getting anywhere near my inbox. |
|
| (29582) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Wed Aug 8 19:59:31 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 19:57:59 2007. Which, of course, he paid ZERO attention to the warnings and bits of advice.Except to get even more agitated. Like when I suggested that he have a beer and calm down... |
|
| (29583) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Wed Aug 8 20:01:00 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 18:26:31 2007. I don't know, haven't been on SubChat yet. I did check the past 3 days of OTChat for any of his posts, but nothing.Surely you know where to look. |
|
| (29584) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Scrabbleship on Wed Aug 8 20:23:23 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. I got two similar e-mails of him bemoaning SURF (of course, because SURF has a man crush on me and likes to see me squirm for no reason). |
|
| (29585) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 20:52:50 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. I got a similar e-mail. What went on over the weekend? |
|
| (29586) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 21:00:59 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Scrabbleship on Wed Aug 8 20:23:23 2007. Recently?The e-mail from him came in this (Wednesday) morning. Same time period? |
|
| (29587) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 21:06:24 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 20:52:50 2007. No idea.I'm not sorry he's gone. His "everybody's out to get me" and "i never did that (for the two times he got in hot water in NYC) are a sorry tale that goes all the way back to Subtalk days. No matter what ever happens to him, it's always somebody else picking on him. Some pick on him for fun, just to see his responses. |
|
| (29588) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by E Line Fan on Wed Aug 8 21:22:27 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 21:06:24 2007. I believe this began with the Minnesota Bridge Collapse Thread, Mr. Lawrence. |
|
| (29589) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Scrabbleship on Wed Aug 8 21:25:36 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 21:00:59 2007. Afternoon actually, 12:30 EDT and 3:30 EDT. Both messages basically stated "I HATE SUBWAYSURF TOO" |
|
| (29590) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by South Brooklyn Railway on Wed Aug 8 21:29:59 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Scrabbleship on Wed Aug 8 20:23:23 2007. He likes you? Heh. |
|
| (29591) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 21:43:20 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 21:06:24 2007. I was never a fan of his as you well know but I'm against censorship on forums like this. But alas, I'm not the moderator. Still would like to know what the "masacre" was. |
|
| (29592) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by BMT Guy on Wed Aug 8 21:48:20 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 21:43:20 2007. The memories of the fights, arguments, misunderstandings and downright bashings between the two of you are starting to bring a tear to my eyes....sniff..sniff.Steve, you know you'll miss him.......give it time. ;-D |
|
| (29593) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 21:50:58 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by BMT Guy on Wed Aug 8 21:48:20 2007. I put an end to the feuding with him months ago. I'm actually sorry that anyone here had to bie the bullet. |
|
| (29594) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Aug 8 22:11:48 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 21:50:58 2007. I never could figure out what you got out of that feud....anyone here had to bie the bullet. Freudian slip or you try to tell us that you got an email from BIE too? |
|
| (29595) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Wed Aug 8 22:53:42 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Mr Mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:51:29 2007. massacre? Anyone else banned? |
|
| (29596) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Wed Aug 8 23:18:20 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Mr Mabstoa on Wed Aug 8 19:51:29 2007. But i still like "Mr. Madposta." |
|
| (29597) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Aug 8 23:32:56 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 21:50:58 2007. I agree with you. As far as I am concerned, a poster can be as obnoxious to me as he/she wants (if by my definition, or yours, or whoever's - it's relative) and I don't ask for his or her expulsion. It does not hurt me for such a person to be posting.I have never asked, nor will I ever ask, for someone to be banned except in the most egregious circumstances. If a poster were making a specific threat to physically harm someone then I would support expulsion from the board, and I would not hesitate to point NYPD or any other agency, as appropriate, to the board for intervention. It's Larry's board, though - he makes the final decision. |
|
| (29598) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Wed Aug 8 23:42:31 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by RonInBayside on Wed Aug 8 23:32:56 2007. Of course you feel that way. You're often obnoxious. So is Train Dude. Most of the rest of us act differently.That being said I have never asked nor wanted anyone here permanently banned. I would support a rule against personal attacks with a penalty of temporary to permanent banning. But like you say it's not my board either and I'm happy with what Larry provides. |
|
| (29599) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 23:44:38 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Easy on Wed Aug 8 22:11:48 2007. no! That was supposed to be "BITE" the bullet |
|
| (29600) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 23:46:20 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Easy on Wed Aug 8 23:42:31 2007. Don't sell yourself short. You are an obnoxious asshole at times, too. |
|
| (29601) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Wed Aug 8 23:48:41 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Easy on Wed Aug 8 22:11:48 2007. Nope. No email. |
|
| (29602) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 23:54:24 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by E Line Fan on Wed Aug 8 21:22:27 2007. It began long before the Minnesota Bridge Collapse Thread.He's the Reef leader, and the constant reefing is due to his almost paranoid attitude towards anyone who disagrees with him. This pattern began on Subtalk in the 90's and moved here when Dave closed the talks. During the SubTalk era, he used 3 or 4 different handles. Check the SubTalk archives for proff. |
|
| (29603) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by monorail on Wed Aug 8 23:57:30 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 18:26:31 2007. "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn!"do you give a F*CK? |
|
| (29604) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Wed Aug 8 23:59:15 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Wed Aug 8 23:54:24 2007. due to his almost paranoid attitude towards anyone who disagrees with him.Even if anyone simply posted a link that proved him wrong - he would instantly attack the person who posted it. |
|
| (29605) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by BMTLines on Thu Aug 9 00:00:34 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by monorail on Wed Aug 8 23:57:30 2007. do you give a F*CK?Depends on how pretty the intended recipient is.... |
|
| (29606) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 00:03:24 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by BMTLines on Wed Aug 8 23:59:15 2007. Including the claim that NYC Subway Resources and the SubTalk archives were a rogue mirror site.Dave does hangout here, he's probably laughing his butt off. |
|
| (29607) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Aug 9 00:03:44 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Train Dude on Wed Aug 8 23:46:20 2007. Maybe, but it's rare and mostly unintentional. |
|
| (29608) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Aug 9 00:09:58 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by BIE on Wed Aug 8 23:48:41 2007. That's good. |
|
| (29609) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Aug 9 00:09:59 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. Did he have mental problems? He once tried to told me he though I was trying to give his computer a worm. |
|
| (29610) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Aug 9 00:12:53 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Aug 9 00:09:59 2007. I think that he was telling you why he wasn't clicking on the link that was provided. The link was provided by someone else, not you. I didn't read it to mean that he thought that you were going to give him a worm although I saw that you took it that way. |
|
| (29611) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Aug 9 00:39:04 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Easy on Thu Aug 9 00:12:53 2007. I wish the thread wasn't deleted so I could see what you're talking about, I'm pretty sure you're right though. |
|
| (29612) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Easy on Thu Aug 9 00:43:46 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Aug 9 00:39:04 2007. Actually you were right. But I still don't think that he meant it like it sounds. I think that he meant the general "you" not you specifically.link |
|
| (29613) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by PATransit on Thu Aug 9 01:05:26 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. damn i guess nobody liked him i would complain but I didn't know him long enough I guess this is the unofficial Roast of Salaamallah, enjoy yourselves lol |
|
| (29614) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Thu Aug 9 01:05:55 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Aug 9 00:09:59 2007. As I look back, I think the poor fellow has some mental problems. Most recent was the picture he posted of him with his wife at the phone booth. That picture was on Dave's site for years, and now he tells us that he took it last week!As were the many other things we often told us here and then vehemently denied. Like taking a heavy equipment school course and then asking us in here how long would it take before the company would stop harrassing him for the money. Or his celebrating Ramadan when he wanted to because he took medication that required him to eat food, as well as a host of other things. Just last week he denied that he apologized to the T/O he got in trouble for videotaping on the 2/5(?) at 149 and the Concourse. He must have told us a least a dozen times that he called the T/O from California to apologize to him. The only thing I never really knew was the LIRR incident in which its rumored that he was thrown off a train for being insolent (shock!). |
|
| (29615) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Aug 9 01:27:55 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Scrabbleship on Wed Aug 8 20:23:23 2007. I like to see you squirm, too, but I have good reasons :Dyour pal, Fred |
|
| (29616) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Aug 9 01:30:13 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Easy on Thu Aug 9 00:43:46 2007. Yes I know, my apologies to salaamallah@hotmail.com. |
|
| (29617) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Mr Mabstoa on Thu Aug 9 01:41:00 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by BIE on Wed Aug 8 23:18:20 2007. He didn't Email me, wonder why? |
|
| (29618) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Aug 9 01:42:13 2007, in response to Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Mr Mabstoa on Thu Aug 9 01:05:55 2007. Yup, I agree that he sure had a good imagination, it's really too bad the poor guy got flamed outta here. |
|
| (29619) | |
Re: salaamallah's GONE!!!!! |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Thu Aug 9 02:08:49 2007, in response to salaamallah's GONE!!!!!, posted by Dan Lawrence on Thu Aug 9 05:50:29 2007. It's entertaining to see his tormentors, most of whom ignored the same warning sit here and wash their hands of their involvement. |
|
[1 2] |
||
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |
|