|
|
| PATCO STORM POLICY (897058) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (897058) | |
PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by kp5308 on Tue Feb 9 11:06:09 2010 RUN....RUN....RUN....RUN....RUN
|
|
|
| (897059) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by NJCL2308 on Tue Feb 9 11:10:11 2010, in response to PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by kp5308 on Tue Feb 9 11:06:09 2010. LOL!Nice shot! |
|
|
| (897071) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Tue Feb 9 11:59:03 2010, in response to PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by kp5308 on Tue Feb 9 11:06:09 2010. Niiiiiiiiice!! :-) |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (897074) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Feb 9 12:03:43 2010, in response to PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by kp5308 on Tue Feb 9 11:06:09 2010. Awesome.I love those cars but I am curious are they gonna be replaced? |
|
|
| (897077) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Feb 9 12:16:06 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by arnine on Tue Feb 9 12:03:43 2010. Rebuilt only. The outer shell will stay, the interior and running components will change. So this is what I heard,anyway. |
|
|
| (897086) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Tue Feb 9 12:41:47 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by TransitChuckG on Tue Feb 9 12:16:06 2010. Cool, I like the looks of the cars but was just thinking they are getting up in age.Glad to see PATCO will just rebuild vs buying new cars :) |
|
|
| (897326) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by RiverLINE3501 on Tue Feb 9 21:31:40 2010, in response to PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by kp5308 on Tue Feb 9 11:06:09 2010. WMATA should learn from PATCO and GROW A FUCKING PAIR!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| (897381) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Feb 9 23:53:49 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by RiverLINE3501 on Tue Feb 9 21:31:40 2010. WMATA should have copied PATCO instead of BART. |
|
|
| (897408) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by The Flxible Neofan on Wed Feb 10 00:40:46 2010, in response to PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by kp5308 on Tue Feb 9 11:06:09 2010. YES! Now THAT'S transit at its best!Great shot - was that taken today? If so, I'm surprised to see so much snow fall over there before night fall! It didn't really start snowing around here in Montgomery County, PA, until around 7 or 8 PM. |
|
|
| (897548) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by kp5308 on Wed Feb 10 11:34:33 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by The Flxible Neofan on Wed Feb 10 00:40:46 2010. was that taken today?Nope....Saturday 2/6. As of now the snow has started falling again here in Marlton NJ, so I'll be going out for some more of this :o) |
|
|
| (897563) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by The Flxible Neofan on Wed Feb 10 11:56:37 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by kp5308 on Wed Feb 10 11:34:33 2010. Heh, that's cool. I wish I lived close enough to rail to do some photofanning. |
|
|
| (897572) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by kp5308 on Wed Feb 10 12:04:29 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by The Flxible Neofan on Wed Feb 10 11:56:37 2010. I wish I lived close enough to rail to do some photofanning.I lived in Reading PA up until 2005, & I actually miss WALKING to Reading Yard. Now I gotta drive about 8 miles. This was about a mile from where I lived: 
|
|
|
| (897634) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by Wado MP73 on Wed Feb 10 13:52:03 2010, in response to PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by kp5308 on Tue Feb 9 11:06:09 2010. Way to go! OTOH, LIRR.... |
|
|
| (897818) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by SchuminWeb on Wed Feb 10 18:40:46 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Feb 9 23:53:49 2010. Possibly, but it's kind of water under the bridge now. But yeah, WMATA gets snow and San Francisco doesn't, and when you copy a system not designed for snow... |
|
|
| (897843) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Wed Feb 10 19:35:52 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by arnine on Tue Feb 9 12:41:47 2010. I like the looks of the carsIn contrast, I think they're the ugliest rolling stock in the Northeast... |
|
|
| (897846) | |
Re: PATCO STORM POLICY |
|
|
Posted by arnine on Wed Feb 10 19:44:04 2010, in response to Re: PATCO STORM POLICY, posted by AEM-7AC #901 on Wed Feb 10 19:35:52 2010. Well we each have our tastes. I like them but hate the look of the M8's and R143/R160s. To each to his/her own I guess |
|
|
